Re: preventing authenticated smtp users from triggering PBL

[Eddie Hallahan]

Hi Aaron,

I know in our setup we just give trusted_networks a score of -120, that
way it usually doesn't matter if they kick off any PBL's etc on their
initial hop.

Regards

Eddie Hallahan
Enterprise Management Consulting
www.emcuk.com

Enterprise Management Consulting is a company registered in England and Wales 
with company number 3134554. VAT registration number is 681038440.



Aaron Bennett wrote:
 Hi,

 I've got an issue where users off-campus who are doing authenticated SMTP/TLS 
 from home networks are having their mail hit by the PBL.  I have 
 trusted_networks set to include the incoming relay,  but still the PBL hits 
 it as follows:

 Received: from cmail.clarku.edu (muse.clarku.edu [140.232.1.151])
   by mothra.clarku.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4FC2684FEA
   for re...@clarku.edu; Tue,  7 Dec 2010 00:11:24 -0500 (EST)
 Received: from SENDERMACHINE (macaddress.hsd1.ma.comcast.net
 [98.216.185.77])
   by cmail.clarku.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F21901E48
   for re...@clarku.edu; Tue,  7 Dec 2010 00:11:24 -0500 (EST)
 From: USER NAME sen...@clarku.edu

 Despite that internal_networks and trusted_networks are set to 
 140.232.0.0/16, the message still triggers the PBL rule.  Given that I know 
 that (unless there's a trojaned machine or whatever) I must trust email that 
 comes in over authenticated SMTP/TLS through the 'cmail' host, how can I 
 prevent it from hitting the PBL?

 Thanks,

 Aaron  

 --- 
 Aaron Bennett
 Manager of Systems Administration
 Clark University ITS

   

Re: Subject Rewrite Based on Score

[Eddie Hallahan]

To be honest it sounds like you want MailScanner.

Eddie Hallahan
Enterprise Management Consulting
www.emcuk.com

Enterprise Management Consulting is a company registered in England and Wales 
with company number 3134544. VAT registration number is 681038440.



Shane Webster wrote:
 Spamassassin Version 3.2.5

 I am curious if it is possible to rewrite the subject based on the value
 of the score. A example of this would be if a score of 4.0 was given the
 subject would state [Potential Spam], but if it was 5.0-10.0 then it is
 [SPAM] if it was greater then 10.0 it would be [SUPER SPAM]. I
 understand this may seem odd but I am just trying to fill the request of
 the client and what they want.

 I would appreciate any incite, I am willing to do the scripting for this
 if needed, but I would appreciate a point in the right direction
 please. 

 Thank you, 

Shane M. Webster