Re: R/O: tie failed: Permission denied

2008-08-12 Thread Hungry Snail



Michael Scheidell wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> From: Hungry Snail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 07:21:01 -0700 (PDT)
>> To: 
>> Subject: R/O: tie failed: Permission denied
>> 
>> 
>> hi Guys,
>> 
>> I have recently moved out mail server to new hardware.
>> 
>> It is setup exactly the same way (an identical mirror), yet I am getting
>> the
>> following warnings in my spamd.log.
>> 
>> Tue Aug 12 15:13:36 2008 [6247] warn: bayes: cannot open bayes databases
>> /etc/mail/spamassassin/spamdb/bayes_* R/O: tie failed: Permission denied
>> Tue Aug 12 15:13:36 2008 [6247] warn: bayes: cannot open bayes databases
>> /etc/mail/spamassassin/spamdb/bayes_* R/O: tie failed: Permission denied
> 
> Probably a permission problem :-)
> 
> 'move to new hardware'. Took disk out, put in in new hardware? Or
> tarball/extrct? Scp? Rsync? Dump / reload?
> Check to make sure the userid's, password file, groups, group permissions
> are still the same.
> 
> -- 
> Michael Scheidell, CTO
>>|SECNAP Network Security
> Winner 2008 Network Products Guide Hot Companies
> FreeBSD SpamAssassin Ports maintainer
> 
> _
> This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r). 
> For Information please see http://www.spammertrap.com
> _
> 
> 
Thanks for the reply,

Well I installed everything on the new server and then just copied across
the mail folders, configuration files and of course the spamdb.

The permissions of the files are identical on both servers, and they are
both set to run as root (probally something to be frowned upon, but it
worked ok on the old server).

even the passwd file looks identical.


-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/R-O%3A-tie-failed%3A-Permission-denied-tp18945254p18946110.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



R/O: tie failed: Permission denied

2008-08-12 Thread Hungry Snail

hi Guys,

I have recently moved out mail server to new hardware.

It is setup exactly the same way (an identical mirror), yet I am getting the
following warnings in my spamd.log.

Tue Aug 12 15:13:36 2008 [6247] warn: bayes: cannot open bayes databases
/etc/mail/spamassassin/spamdb/bayes_* R/O: tie failed: Permission denied
Tue Aug 12 15:13:36 2008 [6247] warn: bayes: cannot open bayes databases
/etc/mail/spamassassin/spamdb/bayes_* R/O: tie failed: Permission denied


The strange thing is, it is marking emails as spam like it should be, and if
I sa-learn a message as spam it correctly shows as having worked when i run
sa-learn --dump magic the 'nspam' number shows as having inreased.

Any ideas :)

Cheers
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/R-O%3A-tie-failed%3A-Permission-denied-tp18945254p18945254.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



dump magic not updating

2008-08-02 Thread Hungry Snail

Hi Guys,

I just ran 

sa-learn --spam --configpath=/etc/mail/spamassassin/ --showdots
/var/vmail/mydomain/myaccount/.NOT-HAM/cur/

and it reported the following.

Learned tokens from 290 message(s) (305 message(s) examined)

however, when I run 'sa-learn --dump magic' it reports exactly the same
numbers as before I ran the sa-learn.

0.000  0  3  0  non-token data: bayes db version
0.000  0 181508  0  non-token data: nspam
0.000  0  30468  0  non-token data: nham
0.000  0 160708  0  non-token data: ntokens
0.000  0 1208248441  0  non-token data: oldest atime
0.000  0 1217700458  0  non-token data: newest atime
0.000  0 1210512752  0  non-token data: last journal sync
atime
0.000  0 1217698387  0  non-token data: last expiry atime
0.000  01382400  0  non-token data: last expire atime
delta
0.000  0  58981  0  non-token data: last expire
reduction count


Any ideas why?

Cheers
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/dump-magic-not-updating-tp18791685p18791685.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



Re: sa-learn question

2008-03-13 Thread Hungry Snail



Matt Kettler-3 wrote:
> 
> previously it had several bits of bad advice:
> Don't /etc/mail/spamassassin to store your bayes DB
> Don't specify -C on  the sa-learn command-line. You REALLY don't want to 
> use that option on any SA tool unless you know exactly what you're 
> doing. (This option is really mostly for testers and developers.)
> Use init scripts to restart spamd
> 

Thanks for all your advice Matt, much appreciated.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/sa-learn-question-tp16019261p16025291.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



Re: sa-learn question

2008-03-12 Thread Hungry Snail

Site-wide is what i'm trying to setup, I guess i need to do some more
googling :)
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/sa-learn-question-tp16019261p16020836.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



Re: sa-learn question

2008-03-12 Thread Hungry Snail



Matt Kettler-3 wrote:
> 
> Did you run it as the same user as the sa-learn?  
> You might want to try the sa-learn again with -D to see what the 
> debugging has to say.
> 

Bah, it works fine if I issue the command via the ssh.

sa-learn --spam --configpath=/etc/mail/spamassassin --showdots
http://www.nabble.com/sa-learn-question-tp16019261p16020246.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



Re: sa-learn question

2008-03-12 Thread Hungry Snail



Hungry Snail wrote:
> 
> Hi Guys,
> 
> I am using spam/notspam via Squirrelmail
> 
> If I mark an email as spam squirrelmail send this command.
> COMMAND USED TO REPORT: /usr/bin/sa-learn --spam
> --configpath=/etc/mail/spamassassin --showdots <
> /var/spool/squirrelmail/attach//sb_tmp_174_1205370641
> 
> The result I get is..
> [0] => Learned tokens from 0 message(s) (1 message(s) examined)
> 
> Does the result look correct? I was just wondering why is has 0 learned
> tokens from 0 messages.
> 
> Regards
> 

Thats what I thought, but I forwarded the message to myself and it didnt get
flagged as spam, it was also a message that was received before spamassassin
was setup.

I did sa-learn --dump magic and this is what I got back.

0.000  0  3  0  non-token data: bayes db version
0.000  0  0  0  non-token data: nspam
0.000  0  0  0  non-token data: nham
0.000  0  0  0  non-token data: ntokens
0.000  0  0  0  non-token data: oldest atime
0.000  0  0  0  non-token data: newest atime
0.000  0  0  0  non-token data: last journal sync
atime
0.000  0  0  0  non-token data: last expiry atime
0.000  0  0  0  non-token data: last expire atime
delta
0.000  0  0  0  non-token data: last expire
reduction count

is the command im using correct? I want the spam/hame rules to apply to
everyone and not have it on a per user basis.

Regards
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/sa-learn-question-tp16019261p16019763.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



sa-learn question

2008-03-12 Thread Hungry Snail

Hi Guys,

I am using spam/notspam via Squirrelmail

If I mark an email as spam squirrelmail send this command.
COMMAND USED TO REPORT: /usr/bin/sa-learn --spam
--configpath=/etc/mail/spamassassin --showdots <
/var/spool/squirrelmail/attach//sb_tmp_174_1205370641

The result I get is..
[0] => Learned tokens from 0 message(s) (1 message(s) examined)

Does the result look correct? I was just wondering why is has 0 learned
tokens from 0 messages.

Regards
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/sa-learn-question-tp16019261p16019261.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.