Domain Keys

2006-04-26 Thread Jeferson Pessoa Santana

Hello List,

It's me again with another doubt =P I'm stuck in this Domain Keys thing 
because I don't know how to create a public and a private key for my 
server. I already read the http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys to 
understand how Domain Keys work but I can't go on with only this argument.


Thanks again,,

Jeff


SPF Problems

2006-04-24 Thread Jeferson Pessoa Santana

Hello list,

I'm using SPF and if the sender domain have a SPF record, then the 
header of the message show the SPF_PASS but if doesn't, the header don't 
show the SPF_FAIL or SOFTFAIL. This thing already happened with someone 
on the list?


Thanks,

Jeff


Re: SPF Problems

2006-04-24 Thread Jeferson Pessoa Santana




I'm a little confuse now. When I Get SPF_FAIL? I think that when the
domain don't have a SPF record, spamassassin scores the message with
FAIL. 



Theo Van Dinter wrote:

  On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 11:58:00AM -0300, Jeferson Pessoa Santana wrote:
  
  
I'm using SPF and if the sender domain have a SPF record, then the 
header of the message show the SPF_PASS but if doesn't, the header don't 
show the SPF_FAIL or SOFTFAIL. This thing already happened with someone 
on the list?

  
  
If the sending domain doesn't have a SPF record, the message can't fail
an SPF check.  There has to be a record for a check to occur.

  






Re: SPF and Domain Keys

2006-03-23 Thread Jeferson Pessoa Santana




Jeferson Pessoa Santana wrote:

  
  
  
  
  
  
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
  
Jeferson Pessoa Santana wrote:
  

  I'm back with new doubts hehehe. I've been reading a lot of articles
and e-mails from the list about SPF and Domain Keys but I don't know
how to use they in SpamAssassin. I'm using SpamAssassin 3.1.0 and I
already installed the Perl Module Mail::SPF::QUERY. There's a new
config lost on my server or I need to put things on the local.cf?



SPF: make sure there's a line like
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF
in your init.pre or v310.pre

DomainKeys: make sure there's a line like
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DomainKeys
in your init.pre or v310.pre
Also make sure you have Mail::DomainKeys installed
There is also a patch you need to make it work with 3.1.0

  
  
Thanks Matthew I read documents about this loadplugin feature but I
was lost about where to put it. 
  
Tks


Does anyone have the link of this Domain Keys patch for the version
3.1.0? Doing a Google Search I found some information about this patch
but any file or text to create the file.







SPF and Domain Keys

2006-03-22 Thread Jeferson Pessoa Santana

Hello Spamassassin,

I'm back with new doubts hehehe. I've been reading a lot of articles and 
e-mails from the list about SPF and Domain Keys but I don't know how to 
use they in SpamAssassin. I'm using SpamAssassin 3.1.0 and I already 
installed the Perl Module Mail::SPF::QUERY. There's a new config lost on 
my server or I need to put things on the local.cf?


Thanks for the attention

Jeff


Re: SPF and Domain Keys

2006-03-22 Thread Jeferson Pessoa Santana








[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Jeferson Pessoa Santana wrote:
  
  
I'm back with new doubts hehehe. I've been reading a lot of articles
and e-mails from the list about SPF and Domain Keys but I don't know
how to use they in SpamAssassin. I'm using SpamAssassin 3.1.0 and I
already installed the Perl Module Mail::SPF::QUERY. There's a new
config lost on my server or I need to put things on the local.cf?

  
  
SPF: make sure there's a line like
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF
in your init.pre or v310.pre

DomainKeys: make sure there's a line like
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DomainKeys
in your init.pre or v310.pre
Also make sure you have Mail::DomainKeys installed
There is also a patch you need to make it work with 3.1.0

  

Thanks Matthew I read documents about this loadplugin feature but I
was lost about where to put it. 

Tks




Sender base

2006-03-16 Thread Jeferson Pessoa Santana

Hi guys,

Does anyone know how to use Sender Base to check e-mails with SpamAssassin?

For those who doesn't know Sender Base : www.senderbase.org.

Thanks,

Jeff


Re: Sender base

2006-03-16 Thread Jeferson Pessoa Santana




Bret Miller wrote:

  

  Not SenderBase specifically, but MXRate is a similar service. See
www.mxrate.com for information.
  

Ah, Alligate, the server that "test incoming mail for RFC compliance",
but lacks a proper behaviour on RSET.

I hope this service is more sane. Anybody with experience 
with MX? Might be worth a try.

  
  
I use it or I wouldn't have known how to use it. ;)

Like most other DNS blacklists, I wouldn't trust it completely. Whether
something is "spam" depends largely on the perception of the person
reviewing it. I don't know how you get in one list or another for
mxrate, but I do know that a number of messages get flagged somewhat
incorrectly at least in my perception of it. So, if you use it, score it
where it helps you increase or decrease the score, but realize it will
likely flag some real e-mail as "recommend block". It did here. So I
treat it as "more likely to be spam" rather than "block this e-mail".

Bret

  

Thanks guys. I'm reading the documentation of this MXRATE and it seems
to me that this service is better than SenderBase. =D




Re: Problems with the Spamd Daemon

2005-12-06 Thread Jeferson Pessoa Santana

Hy Matthew,

I tried to start the daemon in the way that you said in your e-mail but 
the result are the same. For some reason, the daemon goes back to the 
command line /usr/bin/spamd -d -u nobody.


Thanks anyway for all the help provided by you and the entire list

Jeff =)

Obs: I'm still looking for the answer hehehe


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Jeferson Pessoa Santana wrote:
 


/usr/bin/spamd -i -d -u nobody --allowed-ips=200.X.X.X,127.0.0.1
 


Guys,

I think that mey e-mail wasn't clearly, sorry. The IP 200.x.x.x means
that I'm using 200.189.68.194 for example.  And I put the 127.0.0.1
because  I  have a exim daemon started to relay the incoming e-mails.
   



That was perfectly clear, and I understood that was what you meant.
But spamd didn't.

Let's assume the IP address you give above is correct... so this is you...
http://lacnic.net/cgi-bin/lacnic/whois?query=200.189.68.194

You almost certainly don't want to open your spamd server to the entire LACNIC 
world:
200.x.x.x
AKA 200.0.0.0 - 200.255.255.255
AKA 200.0.0.0/8
AKA 200.

You probably meant to open your spamd server only to
Digital Express Ltda
200.189.68.192 - 200.189.68.255
AKA 200.189.68.192/26

So you would call spamd as
/usr/bin/spamd -d -u nobody --allowed-ips=200.189.68.192/26,127.0.0.1

 





Re: Problems with the Spamd Daemon

2005-12-06 Thread Jeferson Pessoa Santana
What I'm triyng to do is to monitor the Spamd port with telnet 
(Ipmonitor is the software that we are using and it's ip is 
200.189.68.194. I didn't read the entire spamd man page =-P


Thanks

Jeff


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Jeferson Pessoa Santana wrote:
 


Hy Matthew,

I tried to start the daemon in the way that you said in your e-mail
but the result are the same. For some reason, the daemon goes back to
the command line /usr/bin/spamd -d -u nobody.

Thanks anyway for all the help provided by you and the entire list
   



One last try... you said the command line is
/usr/bin/spamd -i -d -u nobody --allowed-ips=200.X.X.X,127.0.0.1

Is it, in fact:
/usr/bin/spamd -i -d -u nobody --allowed-ips=200.189.68.248,127.0.0.1

And furthermore, is the IP of the machine 200.189.68.248?

If so, then
/usr/bin/spamd -d -u nobody
makes sense.

Why?

Because -i is ignored, as it has no interface IP...
And --allowed-ips specifies the default IPs anyway.


From the man spamd page:

By default, connections are only accepted from localĀ­ host [127.0.0.1].

And of course, the interface IP addresses are all on the local host.

So that --allowed-ips, though it is parsed, is just a fancy way of specifying 
the default anyway.

 





Re: Problems with the Spamd Daemon

2005-12-05 Thread Jeferson Pessoa Santana

Guys,
   

I think that mey e-mail wasn't clearly, sorry. The IP 200.x.x.x means 
that I'm using 200.189.68.194 for example.  And I put the 127.0.0.1 
because  I  have a exim daemon started to relay the incoming e-mails.   





[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Jeferson Pessoa Santana wrote:
 


Hi guys,

A few hours ago I started my spamassassin with this command line:

/usr/bin/spamd -i -d -u nobody --allowed-ips=200.X.X.X,127.0.0.1

And then, for some reason that I don't know yet, wi th the ps ax
command, I received this 


/usr/bin/spamd -d -u nobody
   



Well...
-i requires an argument, which you don't supply.  So -i is ignored.

--allowed-ips takes IP addresses, but not in the format you specify.  spamd 
doesn't understand 200.X.X.X, so --allowed-ips is ignored.

Try

/usr/bin/spamd -d -u nobody --allowed-ips=200.0.0.0/8,127.0.0.1
or
/usr/bin/spamd -i -d -u nobody --allowed-ips=200.,127.0.0.1

 





Problems with the Spamd Daemon

2005-12-02 Thread Jeferson Pessoa Santana




Hi guys,

A few hours ago I started my spamassassin with this command line:

/usr/bin/spamd -i -d -u nobody --allowed-ips=200.X.X.X,127.0.0.1

And then, for some reason that I don't know yet, wi th the "ps ax"
command, I received this

/usr/bin/spamd -d -u nobody

I was using this second command line all the time, but when I
changed to first, SpamAssassin simply don't accept and back to the
"original command line" after some minutes. My logs don't say anything
about this.

Does anyone knows what's happening?

Thanks 

Jeff

"Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year" =P







SpamAssassin: how to generate stats

2005-11-21 Thread Jeferson Pessoa Santana

Hi guys,

I'm using SpamAssassin 3.1.0 and I don't know how to generate stats 
about the number of Spam, Non-Spam received, and Top Rules used. Can you 
guys know how to do this?


Thanks

Jeff


Creating Rules for specific domains

2005-10-18 Thread Jeferson Pessoa Santana

Hi People,

I'm having some problems with the SpamAssassin Rules. I have to e-mails 
server (Enchange and Exim) and another server with SpamAssassin and Exim 
to delivery the messages. In my DNS server, I'd put the mx(10) poiting 
to the  SPamAssassin server and it's delivery the messages to the users 
mailbox.  My problem is, I don't know how to  create  specific rules for 
each domain that pass through the SpamAssassin server or maybe set 
different scores in the existent rules for each domain.


Does anyone know how to do this?

Thanks

Jeff