AM:BOOST
I am seeing a test/rule that comes back as AM:BOOST. I cannot find this rule in the spamassassin rules. Does anybody know where this might be coming from? I am also running SaneSecurity rules in ClamAV, maybe it is in there? I am running SpamAssassin and ClamAV thru Amavis. Thanks, Jeff
Re: AM:BOOST
Jeff Grossman j...@stikman.com wrote: I am seeing a test/rule that comes back as AM:BOOST. I cannot find this rule in the spamassassin rules. Does anybody know where this might be coming from? I am also running SaneSecurity rules in ClamAV, maybe it is in there? I am running SpamAssassin and ClamAV thru Amavis. After I posted this message I figured out this was a score from Amavis. Sorry to waste anybody's time. Jeff
Re: feed MimeDefanged mail to sa-learn?
Loren Wilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When my MimeDefang/Spamassassin system tags a message as spam, it adds the Spamassassin report as an attachment to the original message. Can somebody confirm for me that it would be a BAD idea to feed these MD modified messages to sa-learn? No, it wouldn't be a bad idea. SA knows how to remove its own markup. Where you get into trouble is when you forward a spam to a mailbox to feed to SA. SA won't know to remove the last forwarding step in the spam. How about redirecting an e-mail to a mailbox to feed into SA. Would that work, or is it the same as being forwarded? Jeff
Site-Wide Bayes Question
I have just set up a Sendmail server with MIMEDefang and SpamAssassin 3.0.1. This machine is a front-end box to my IMAP server. I am using a site wide bayes database. I am curious how other people are handling spam and ham with the bayes database. I have set up two accounts on the front-end server for a spam mailbox and a ham mailbox for sa-learn. If my users just forward the message to either one of those mailboxes, will sa-learn be able to properly register that e-mail? Or should the user be using redirect? Or since it has already been sent on to another mail server, is it worthless without the raw message? Thanks for any help you can offer me. Jeff
Re: Site-Wide Bayes Question
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jeff Grossman wrote: I have just set up a Sendmail server with MIMEDefang and SpamAssassin 3.0.1. This machine is a front-end box to my IMAP server. I have a similar setup but with Exchange 2000 as the IMAP server. I've created two public folders: FN: spam but not tagged FP: tagged but not spam Users drag and drop errors to the appropriate folder, preserving the headers If your IMAP server supports public folders, this may be the best way to go Otherwise you might consider having a pair of error folders inside each mailbox - then have a script with universal access to all mailboxes walk through each mailbox, pulling from the error folders only Thank you for the suggestions. Jeff
