p5-Mail-SpamAssassin 3.0.0 (fwd)
Hi, One FreeBSD user is experiencing these problems, does anyone have any clue about it ? +- Forwarded Message | Date: lundi 18 octobre 2004 10:05 -0400 | From: Lukas Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Subject: p5-Mail-SpamAssassin 3.0.0 | | | I'm having hella problems with the SpamAssassin 3.0.0 port every since I | upgraded. The main problem is that spamd appears to be hanging. It | works for a few hours, and then it stops being able to spawn children or | accept connections. So all the spamc connections time out after 3 | retries and fail. procmail has been boucning mail back to senders | because of the fact that it's hitting the timeout for how long it can | run. I'm not sure what to do. There is no previous version in the ports | tree for me to fall back on. | | Is anyone else having these problems? I'm currently running | 4.9-RELEASE-p10. +-- End Forwarded Message -- -- Mathieu Arnold
Re: SA-3.0.0 for FBSD Ports
+-Le 25/09/2004 18:16 -0500, Jack L. Stone a dit : | At 07:32 PM 9.25.2004 +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote: | It's scheduled to be updated as soon as the port tree is unfrozen, if you | want to test the patch, it's available there : | http://people.freebsd.org/~mat/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.0.diff | | Mat: Thanks, the patch worked smoothly as silk. Had to do some tweaking | here 'n there, but you covered the big job very well -- dependencies, etc. | Found I needed NET::LDAP according to debug. Well, Net::LDAP is a specificity of your local configuration (like it could have been for instance DBD::mysql or DBD::whatever), and as I don't want to add them all or to add a long long list of possible dependencies to keep it simple, I'll leave that kind of thing to the upgrade procedure everyone's going to have to follow :-) | SA-3.0 is up and running on my test box and looks good. Nice to hear positive feedback :-) -- Mathieu Arnold pgpILJZSDgXC9.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: FreeBSD port of SpamAssassin 3.0.0 (continued)
+-le 25/09/2004 02:20 -0700, Pat Lashley écrivait : | --On Saturday, September 25, 2004 08:59:03 +0200 Mathieu Arnold | [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | | +-Le 24/09/2004 18:20 -0700, Pat Lashley a dit : || SA 3.0 should probably be a separate port rather than an update || to the existing SA port; due to the lack of backwards compatability || in the API. For example, it would break the Exim port which by || default includes the ExiScan patches. (The Exim port would still || build; but the SpamAssassin support would fail at run time.) | | I don't think we will keep the old spamassassin. The 2.64 version will be | the only one working with 5.005_03, but well... It's not possible to have | SA3 work with 5.005_03 (believe me, I tried). | So, a few days before committing the SA3 update, I'll send a mail with the | patch I plan to commit to maintainers of ports depending on SA264 for them | to update/patch/whatever. | | That seems like an awfully short transition period. Why not | a separate 3.0 port for a while; with the old one being deprecated? | Then remove the 2.64 port once the dependant ports have been updated | and in the field long enough for some serious testing? I don't want to have a SA3 port, I'm more in favor of a SA264 port designed for perl 5.005_03 as the databases/p5-DBI-137 port. This is still under discussion. -- Mathieu Arnold
Re: FreeBSD port of SpamAssassin 3.0.0 (continued)
+-le 25/09/2004 13:21 -0400, Dan Mahoney, System Admin écrivait : | On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, Mathieu Arnold wrote: | | Does this mean we're going to get/need a port in for the IP::Country::Fast | module? I can create it if you like. | | (I haven't been able to find a useful documentation on creating a port 00 | is there one?) I can add it, not a problem, I'll have a look at this on Monday. | A menu-based config (like the one for the mod_php) port would probably be | useful as well, to enable things like SSL, and database support. SSL is the only thing you need to have to get compiled in, so I'll had some kind of WITH_SSL thing. Database support is enabled if you enable it in the config, and if you want to enable it, you're surely already have DBI and the appropriate DBD modules, and I'm not going to add cases for all DBD:: Modules we have in the tree. | -Dan | | +-le 25/09/2004 02:20 -0700, Pat Lashley écrivait : | | --On Saturday, September 25, 2004 08:59:03 +0200 Mathieu Arnold | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | | | | +-Le 24/09/2004 18:20 -0700, Pat Lashley a dit : | || SA 3.0 should probably be a separate port rather than an update | || to the existing SA port; due to the lack of backwards compatability | || in the API. For example, it would break the Exim port which by | || default includes the ExiScan patches. (The Exim port would still | || build; but the SpamAssassin support would fail at run time.) | | | | I don't think we will keep the old spamassassin. The 2.64 version will | | be the only one working with 5.005_03, but well... It's not possible to | | have SA3 work with 5.005_03 (believe me, I tried). | | So, a few days before committing the SA3 update, I'll send a mail with | | the patch I plan to commit to maintainers of ports depending on SA264 | | for them to update/patch/whatever. | | | | That seems like an awfully short transition period. Why not | | a separate 3.0 port for a while; with the old one being deprecated? | | Then remove the 2.64 port once the dependant ports have been updated | | and in the field long enough for some serious testing? | | I don't want to have a SA3 port, I'm more in favor of a SA264 port designed | for perl 5.005_03 as the databases/p5-DBI-137 port. This is still under | discussion. | | -- | Mathieu Arnold | | | -- | | We need another cat. This one's retarded. | | -Cali, March 8, 2003 (3:43 AM) | | Dan Mahoney | Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek | Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC | ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM | Site: http://www.gushi.org | --- -- Mathieu Arnold
Re: SA-3.0.0 for FBSD Ports
+-le 25/09/2004 11:38 -0600, Sherwood Botsford écrivait : | On Thursday 23 September 2004 19:33, Jack L. Stone wrote: | Does anyone know who is handling the update of the FBSD | ports for the new SA-3 release? Or better yet, when it is | scheduled? | | Thanks! | | Since it's in limbo right now, install using CPAN. Quite | painless really. (Assuming that you have a version 5.6 of | perl installed.) (just subscribed, don't have the original mail) It's scheduled to be updated as soon as the port tree is unfrozen, if you want to test the patch, it's available there : http://people.freebsd.org/~mat/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.0.diff -- Mathieu Arnold
