Foreign Languages

2007-03-27 Thread Nathan Brink
Does SPAM Assassin score what we boarheaded Americans consider to be
foreign language email messages the same as it would English?
 
Pardon my ignorance on the matter!
 
Thanks!!
Nate


RE: Spamassassin munging headers

2006-08-28 Thread Nathan Brink
Title: Scalix message content




Hello SA Users,

Our software uses 
SpamAssassin to scorevarious content, but the score below doesn't make 
much sense:
"2.6 
ALL_NATURAL BODY: Spam is 100% natural?!"

Anyone familiar with this or have insight? Also, if there is any documentation on 
scoring, please send that alongtoo.

Thanks!
Nate



From: Hardy, Anthony 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 9:21 
AMTo: usersSubject: Spamassassin munging 
headers

A few 
particular email servers have been complaining about munged email headers and it 
seems that SpamAssassin is the culprit. I saw something about this somewhere on 
another list, but couldnt find a fix. It seems as if the problem still exists 
in the latest version. 

The 
workaround was to remove status headers:

remove_header all 
Status

I believe 
the problem was in a lack of a proper return at the end of the spamassassin 
version line? Only a /n or a /r and not both. Is anyone else aware of this 
problem?

Anthony HardyDirector of 
Technology/ISJefferson Davis Community 
College[EMAIL PROTECTED]251.809.1531



What does ALL_NATURAL BODY mean?

2006-08-28 Thread Nathan Brink
Title: Scalix message content



Hey Bill,

Sorry about that- first timer in this group... anyone know 
why a message is scored with the following?:
"2.6 ALL_NATURAL BODY: Spam is 100% 
natural?!"

Thanks 
again,
Nate



From: Bill Landry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 9:37 AMTo: Nathan Brink; 
usersSubject: Re: Spamassassin munging headers

Why would you hijack someone else's thread? 
If you are not going to at least response to the original question, then at 
least have the courtesy to start your own new message thread.

Bill

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Nathan 
  Brink 
  To: users 
  Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 9:27 
  AM
  Subject: RE: Spamassassin munging 
  headers
  
  
  Hello SA Users,
  
  Our software 
  uses SpamAssassin to scorevarious content, but the score below doesn't 
  make much sense:
  "2.6 
  ALL_NATURAL BODY: Spam is 100% natural?!"
  
  Anyone familiar with this or have insight? Also, if there is any documentation on 
  scoring, please send that alongtoo.
  
  Thanks!
  Nate
  
  
  
  From: Hardy, Anthony 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 9:21 
  AMTo: usersSubject: Spamassassin munging 
  headers
  
  A few 
  particular email servers have been complaining about munged email headers and 
  it seems that SpamAssassin is the culprit. I saw something about this 
  somewhere on another list, but couldnt find a fix. It seems as if the problem 
  still exists in the latest version. 
  
  The 
  workaround was to remove status headers:
  
  remove_header all 
  Status
  
  I believe 
  the problem was in a lack of a proper return at the end of the spamassassin 
  version line? Only a /n or a /r and not both. Is anyone else aware of this 
  problem?
  
  Anthony HardyDirector of 
  Technology/ISJefferson Davis Community 
  College[EMAIL PROTECTED]251.809.1531