whitelisting "from" and not "return path" addresses
HI, After whitelisting my own email address, it seems that spammers will frequently put my own email address in the "return path" but not in the "from". Is it possible for Spam Assassin to make a distinction between the two so that it will block such messages? Below is an example of such headers. -- Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on mail.prospeed.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-75.6 required=4.7 tests=BAYES_80,EXTRA_MPART_TYPE, FORGED_RCVD_HELO,FUZZY_OCR,HTML_90_100,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_08, HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_MOSTLY,RCVD_HELO_IP_MISMATCH,RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB, RCVD_IN_XBL,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no version=3.1.7 Received: from 82.79.197.4 (86-122-136-2.rdsnet.ro [86.122.136.2] (may be forged)) by mail.prospeed.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBSKH6sn023009 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:17:07 -0500 Received: from fm-bank.com.s8b2.psmtp.com (port=6583 helo=upmydjbtqx) by 82.79.197.4 with smtp id 8fRjB-boT0U-56 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 28 Dec 2006 22:17:10 +0200 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "Leonard West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: wicked shall not; that he his wages be in sending a Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 22:17:10 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; type="multipart/alternative"; boundary="=_NextPart_000_000C_01C72ACD.E74AF4E0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2871 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2871 Thanks, Paul
unsubscribe
Re: whitelisting "from" and not "return path" addresses
HI, After whitelisting my own email address, it seems that spammers will frequently put my own email address in the "return path" but not in the "from". Is it possible for Spam Assassin to make a distinction between the two so that it will not match the "return address" to the whitelisted address? Below is an example of such headers: -- Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <- My address which is white listed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on mail.prospeed.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-75.6 required=4.7 tests=BAYES_80,EXTRA_MPART_TYPE, FORGED_RCVD_HELO,FUZZY_OCR,HTML_90_100,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_08, HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_MOSTLY,RCVD_HELO_IP_MISMATCH,RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB, RCVD_IN_XBL,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no version=3.1.7 Received: from 82.79.197.4 (86-122-136-2.rdsnet.ro [86.122.136.2] (may be forged)) by mail.prospeed.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBSKH6sn023009 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:17:07 -0500 Received: from fm-bank.com.s8b2.psmtp.com (port=6583 helo=upmydjbtqx) by 82.79.197.4 with smtp id 8fRjB-boT0U-56 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 28 Dec 2006 22:17:10 +0200 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "Leonard West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <-- not my address, not in whitelist To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: wicked shall not; that he his wages be in sending a Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 22:17:10 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; type="multipart/alternative"; boundary="=_NextPart_000_000C_01C72ACD.E74AF4E0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2871 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2871 Thanks, Paul
