RE: SPAMD dies
>Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: > > >Thomas Kinghorn [MTNNS -Rosebank] wrote: >> Good morning list. >> >> I am having issues with SPAMD just dying and no info being shown in >> the logs to help troubleshoot. >> >> The system is running Redhat 9, Latest versions of Exim & spamassassin. >> Spamassassin uses pyzor, razor & dcc. >What "latest version" of SpamAssassin are you using? Have you (or a distribution maintainer) applied any patches to it? >Daryl Apologies. I am running Spamassassin 3.0.4 (latest stable release) and The only patch I have used is the sa-exim patch. Regards Tom
SPAMD dies
Title: SPAMD dies Good morning list. I am having issues with SPAMD just dying and no info being shown in the logs to help troubleshoot. This is what I have: Jul 15 01:01:04 jp-mx-1 spamd[16441]: identified spam (8.8/4.4) for xadmin:501 in 4.5 seconds, 5865 bytes.Jul 15 01:01:04 jp-mx-1 spamd[16441]: result: Y 8 - AWL,BAYES_99,J_CHICKENPOX_31,J_CHICKENPOX_41,J_CHICKENPOX_47,NO_REAL_NAME,PYZOR_CHECK scantime=4.5,size=5865,mid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,bayes=1,autolearn=no Jul 15 01:03:11 jp-mx-1 spamc[17673]: connect(AF_INET) to spamd at 127.0.0.1 failed, retrying (#1 of 3): Connection refused Jul 15 01:03:12 jp-mx-1 spamc[17673]: connect(AF_INET) to spamd at 127.0.0.1 failed, retrying (#2 of 3): Connection refusedJul 15 01:03:13 jp-mx-1 spamc[17673]: connect(AF_INET) to spamd at 127.0.0.1 failed, retrying (#3 of 3): Connection refused Jul 15 01:03:14 jp-mx-1 spamc[17673]: connection attempt to spamd aborted after 3 retries The system is running Redhat 9, Latest versions of Exim & spamassassin. Spamassassin uses pyzor, razor & dcc. Many thanks Tom
Upgrade woes
Title: Upgrade woes Hi List. Since upgrading, more spam gets through. See X-Spam-Status: From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_Part_8034_7061452.1120558151018" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 64.97.136.230 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FROM DAVID X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on jp-mx-1.mtnns.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=4.4 tests=BAYES_50,DCC_CHECK, HTML_00_10,HTML_MESSAGE,J_CHICKENPOX_33,J_CHICKENPOX_41,MILLION_USD, MISSING_HEADERS,NIGERIAN_BODY1,RISK_FREE,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS, autolearn=no version=3.0.4 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Fri, 03 Jun 2005 08:49:53 +0200) Bcc: Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Jul 2005 11:03:24.0484 (UTC) FILETIME=[29E08040:01C58151] --=_Part_8034_7061452.1120558151018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable --=_Part_8034_7061452.1120558151018 Content-Type: text/html;charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable --=_Part_8034_7061452.1120558151018-- Regards, Tom Kinghorn
More spam since upgrading
Title: More spam since upgrading Morning list. I have recently upgraded to SpamAssassin 3.0.4 from 3.0.1 and have noticed Quite a large increase of the number of SPAM slipping through. Have all the standard ruleset scores been lowered? I am using the rulesets from sare aswell. Does anyone else see the same trend? Many thanks Regards, Tom Kinghorn
RE: [OT] Spam Quarantine
Hi All. Thanks for the responses. Maia seems extremely cool, just wish there were some screenshots to look at. Definetely seems like a good way to go considering the platforms I am currently running on. Thanks again Tom -Original Message- From: Robert LeBlanc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 February 2005 11:45 AM To: Thomas Kinghorn [MTNNS -Rosebank] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OT] Spam Quarantine -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thomas Kinghorn [MTNNS -Rosebank] wrote: | Hi List. | | Sorry to post this here but I am stumped as where to look. | | I am looking for webmail software which can be a frontend to A | catchall for spam. | | Basically I would like to login via the web and release messages. | Also, a once-a-day digest would be great. Take a look at Maia Mailguard <http://www.maiamailguard.com/>, which is based on amavisd-new and SpamAssassin, and uses PHP and Perl scripts. - -- Robert LeBlanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Renaissoft, Inc. Maia Mailguard <http://www.maiamailguard.com/> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCEcSFGmqOER2NHewRAlJfAJ916eQF7MVkiYkAPSSOTytlyHZVPgCdHtQK 3qzppncuFf0CigcF0fhAot0= =UYMr -END PGP SIGNATURE-
[OT] Spam Quarantine
Title: [OT] Spam Quarantine Hi List. Sorry to post this here but I am stumped as where to look. I am looking for webmail software which can be a frontend to A catchall for spam. Basically I would like to login via the web and release messages. Also, a once-a-day digest would be great. Thanks Regards, Tom
RE: Help...dcc
Hi Laurent Here is the dcc stats output: [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# cdcc stats dcc2.dcc-servers.net 212.95.66.24,6277 server-ID 1179 /var/dcc/map 09:45:36 version 1.2.50 tracing ANON CLNT 13860861 hash entries 7654642 used 418517136 DB bytes 51 ms delay 219262 NOPs 175 ADMN 68336 query >10026 clients since 00:01:07 2826276 reports 13285>102899>1002898>10002898 many answers 1419813>10 1193713>100 926641>1000 802886 many 0 bad IDs0 passwds 16 error responses 26466 retransmitted 0 answers rate-limited 0 anonymous 0 rejected reports flood on 4 streams 3 out active 3 in 1816047 total flooded in 703255 accepted 566555 stale 545789 dup 0 white0 delete 3523570 reports added between Feb 04 00:01:07.994515 CET and Feb 04 08:45:36 But debug: DCCifd is not available: no r/w dccifd socket found. debug: executable for dccproc was found at /usr/local/bin/dccproc debug: DCC is available: /usr/local/bin/dccproc debug: entering helper-app run mode debug: setuid: helper proc 1010: ruid=0 euid=0 debug: DCC: got response: missing message body; fatal error debug: leaving helper-app run mode debug: DCC -> check failed: no X-DCC returned (did you create a map file?): missing message body; fatal error debug: Running tests for priority: 500 debug: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL=HASH(0x8c989f4) implements 'check_post_dnsbl' Any advice? Thanks Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# -Original Message- From: Laurent Luyckx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 February 2005 12:12 PM To: Gray, Richard Cc: Thomas Kinghorn [MTNNS -Rosebank]; users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: RE: Help...dcc On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 10:01 +, Gray, Richard wrote: > > > > debug: DCC -> check failed: no X-DCC returned (did you create a > map file?): no valid DCC server hostnames > > Did you? > > The errors certainly suggest that everything is working, but that dcc > can't find any servers. The map file is either not there or not complete. Try by using the map.txt shipped with your version and do: $ cd you_dcc_dir $ rm map $ cdcc "new map; load map.txt" Type cdcc stats to check if you've any answer from the public servers. Hope it helps. > > R -- Laurent Luyckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Help...dcc
Title: Help...dcc Hi List. Does anyone have a howto for building Spamassin with dcc? MTA is exim using exiscan I have razor and oyzor running fine, but cant get dcc to work. debug: DCCifd is not available: no r/w dccifd socket found. debug: executable for dccproc was found at /usr/local/bin/dccproc debug: DCC is available: /usr/local/bin/dccproc debug: entering helper-app run mode debug: setuid: helper proc 706: ruid=0 euid=0 debug: DCC: got response: no valid DCC server hostnames debug: leaving helper-app run mode debug: DCC -> check failed: no X-DCC returned (did you create a map file?): no valid DCC server hostnames Please help Thanks Tom
[OT] Dcc help
Title: [OT] Dcc help Hi List I am running SA-3.0.2 with Exim. I have installed Razor and I am "trying" to install dcc as per the instructions in the SpamAssassin :INSTALL file. However, I cannot seem to get dcc to read. I have done: $ cd $DCC_HOME $ cdcc info > map.txt $ cdcc "new map; load map" open(/var/dcc/map): File exists ? $ Here are the logs. debug: DCCifd is not available: no r/w dccifd socket found. debug: Current PATH is: /usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin debug: executable for dccproc was found at /bin/dccproc debug: DCC is available: /bin/dccproc debug: entering helper-app run mode debug: setuid: helper proc 14861: ruid=501 euid=501 debug: DCC: got response: missing SMTP header lines; fatal error debug: leaving helper-app run mode debug: DCC -> check failed: no X-DCC returned (did you create a map file?): missing SMTP header lines; fatal error Does anyone have a howto for SpamAssassin? Thanks Tom
RE: SA 3.0.2 with Razor & DCC
Hi Laurent. Did what you said. Got the following: [EMAIL PROTECTED] spamassassin]$ cd $DCC_HOME [EMAIL PROTECTED] xadmin]$ cdcc info > map.txt [EMAIL PROTECTED] xadmin]$ cdcc "new map; load map.txt" open(/var/lib/dcc/map): File exists ? [EMAIL PROTECTED] xadmin]$ Tom -Original Message- From: Laurent Luyckx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 January 2005 10:28 AM To: Thomas Kinghorn [MTNNS -Rosebank] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SA 3.0.2 with Razor & DCC On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 08:34 +0200, Thomas Kinghorn [MTNNS -Rosebank] wrote: > debug: DCC -> check failed: no X-DCC returned (did you create a map > file?): missing SMTP header lines; fatal error > "(did you create a map file?)" DCC seems not be configured yet. If you plan to use the public servers, do this: cd $DCC_HOME (where dcc resides) cdcc info > map.txt cdcc "new map; load map.txt" > Any advise on how to rectify this would be appreciated. > Laurent. -- Laurent Luyckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
SA 3.0.2 with Razor & DCC
Title: SA 3.0.2 with Razor & DCC Hi List. I have recently installed razor & dcc and found that Razor is working great but DCC gives errors. Here is a snippet from a debug: debug: DCCifd is not available: no r/w dccifd socket found. debug: Current PATH is: /usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin debug: executable for dccproc was found at /bin/dccproc debug: DCC is available: /bin/dccproc debug: entering helper-app run mode debug: setuid: helper proc 14861: ruid=501 euid=501 debug: DCC: got response: missing SMTP header lines; fatal error debug: leaving helper-app run mode debug: DCC -> check failed: no X-DCC returned (did you create a map file?): missing SMTP header lines; fatal error Any advise on how to rectify this would be appreciated. Platform: Exim-4.44, Spamassassin 3.0.2, latest sa-exim patch, latest exiscan patch, ClamAv. OS: Redhat 8 Thanks Tom
Spamassassin 3.0.2 child processes
Title: Spamassassin 3.0.2 child processes Hi List. Is there a way to limit spamd child processes? # ps -ef | grep spam root 602 1 0 13:28 ? 00:00:12 /usr/bin/spamd -d -c -m5 -H xadmin 649 602 0 13:29 ? 00:00:09 spamd child xadmin 650 602 0 13:29 ? 00:00:07 spamd child xadmin 651 602 0 13:29 ? 00:00:13 spamd child root 652 602 0 13:29 ? 00:00:10 spamd child root 653 602 0 13:29 ? 00:00:08 spamd child xadmin 797 792 0 13:52 ? 00:00:00 spamc -s 57344 -d 127.0.0.1 -p 7 xadmin 798 796 0 13:53 ? 00:00:00 spamc -s 57344 -d 127.0.0.1 -p 7 xadmin 808 801 0 13:54 ? 00:00:00 spamc -s 57344 -d 127.0.0.1 -p 7 Regards, Tom Kinghorn
OT: razor...compilation problems
Title: OT: razor...compilation problems Hi List. I have decided to give Razor a go. However, I am getting an error during "make test" t/rsync..ok Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed --- t/heuristic.t 15 1 6.67% 7 Failed 1/20 test scripts, 95.00% okay. 1/349 subtests failed, 99.71% okay. make[1]: *** [test_dynamic] Error 29 make[1]: Leaving directory `/downloads/razor-agents-sdk-2.03/URI-1.19' make: *** [test] Error 2 What could this be caused by? Cant seem to find anything on it. Thanks Tom email and the documents transmitted with it are confidential and are intended for the addressee only, and must be treated as such. The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of MTN Network Solutions (MTN NS). MTN NS accepts no liability in respect of any illegal content. No employee or agent of MTN NS is authorised to conclude a binding agreement on behalf of MTN NS by email (or otherwise) unless specifically stating otherwise in such correspondence. Binding agreements with MTN NS may only be concluded if printed in hard copy and signed by an authorised representative of MTN NS.
Why the difference?
Title: Why the difference? Morning list. I have been having a few "funnies" with the latest SA. Below is a header from a mail that slipped through. Below that is the same mail when fed into SA using the -t switch. The scores differ greatly. Any ideas? Thanks Tom Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 Received: from rb-mx-1.mtnns.net ([209.212.96.2]) by bonsai.mtnns.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Sat, 4 Dec 2004 20:04:05 +0200 Received: from [61.186.110.78] (helo=surferboard.com) by rb-mx-1.mtnns.net with smtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CaeGI-00021Y-PU; Sat, 04 Dec 2004 20:04:09 +0200 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "brendon sousa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "elmer sadbury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2004 15:39:11 + MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 61.186.110.78 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: way to great savvings online Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on rb-mx-1.mtnns.net X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.0 required=4.4 tests=BAYES_99,RCVD_IN_SBL, URIBL_SBL autolearn=no version=3.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.1 (built Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:50:16 +0200) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on rb-mx-1.mtnns.net) Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Dec 2004 18:04:05.0921 (UTC) FILETIME=[A4F56110:01C4DA2B] $ spamassassin -t SpamAssassin results -- This mail is probably spam. The original message has been altered so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. Content analysis details: (7.0 hits, 4.4 required) 2.5 HEAD_LONG Message headers are very long -3.3 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts 2.1 HEAD_ILLEGAL_CHARS Header contains too many raw illegal characters 0.1 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header 1.9 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100% [score: 1.] 1.0 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL listed in the SBL blocklist [URIs: profitsappear.com] 1.5 URIBL_WS_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the WS SURBL blocklist [URIs: profitsappear.com] 1.2 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.0 UPPERCASE_25_50 message body is 25-50% uppercase End of SpamAssassin results -
Strange differences
Title: Strange differences Hi List. I have a number of spams that slip through lately. However, running spamassassin -t < message shows a much Higher score than the header when the mail was delivered to my inbox. I have attached the message that was delivered. Below is the output of spamassassin -t --- Start SpamAssassin results -- This mail is probably spam. The original message has been altered so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. Content analysis details: (7.6 hits, 4.4 required) 2.5 HEAD_LONG Message headers are very long -3.3 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts 2.1 HEAD_ILLEGAL_CHARS Header contains too many raw illegal characters 0.1 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header 0.8 MANGLED_FROM BODY: mangled from 0.8 MANGLED_SPAM BODY: mangled spam 0.8 MANGLED_TIME BODY: mangled time 0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5013] 1.0 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL listed in the SBL blocklist [URIs: savealongwith.com] 1.5 URIBL_WS_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the WS SURBL blocklist [URIs: savealongwith.com] 1.2 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.0 UPPERCASE_25_50 message body is 25-50% uppercase End of SpamAssassin results - Any ideas on why this gets delivered? Thanks Tom <> --- Begin Message --- meds: most acceptable prices meds online for pain relief, seizure, heart disease, allergy, high blood pressure, men's health and sexual health. at $0 cost for consultation Press Here To Enter Spending time trying to get my prescriptions filled used to give me a headache. What a relief is was when I found your site. No more headaches! Keep up the good work, William B. SD Jason for being absent yesterday. He had a cold and could not breed well..absent yesterday. She was in bed with gramps.Gloria was absent yesterday as she was having a gangover. excuse Burma, she has been sick and under the doctor.Maryann was absent December 1116, because shespirochaete6dougal2materializes philanthropist lumpur --- End Message ---
RE: need testers for a new memory patch
Thanks Theo -Original Message- From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 November 2004 07:35 AM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: need testers for a new memory patch On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 07:24:37AM +0200, Thomas Kinghorn [MTNNS -Rosebank] wrote: > What is the correct syntax for patching? > It keeps asking which file to patch. When you're in the main directory of the unpacked tarball, run: patch -p0 < patchfile Then install and enjoy. :) -- Randomly Generated Tagline: Apu:You look familiar, sir. Are you on the television or something? Homer: Sorry, buddy. You got me confused with Fred Flintstone. Homer's Night Out
RE: need testers for a new memory patch
Hi List. This is a really dumb question and I appologise for it but I cannot seem to get the patch to work. What is the correct syntax for patching? It keeps asking which file to patch. Thanks Tom -Original Message- From: Dawn Keenan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 24 November 2004 04:45 PM To: Justin Mason Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: need testers for a new memory patch > So, I have a new patch that should greatly improve memory usage if you > have a low memory situation (where "low" == "< 100MB of free RAM", > typically ;) > > It should apply cleanly to 3.0.0. I'd be very interested in > feedback from people trying it... here it is: > > http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3983 > > It adds a couple of spamd command-line switches, but should do sane > things if you use your existing switches as-is. We're using this patch on two Linux servers of a four machine cluster running 3.0.1. We don't have memory or swap problems, but the patch appears to have eliminated a problem we'd been encountering since upgrading to 3.0.0: a few times a day each machine would have all its children die around the same time and become unresponsive for long enough that some messages (enough to generate complaints, I don't have numbers) would pass through unscanned. Each machine in our cluster currently handles on average 20 messages per minute with peaks around 60. With 1 GB of memory in each server, we aren't touching swap even though we're using the same machines to do ClamAV and j-chkmail miltering for most of the campus. -- Dawn Keenan Information Systems and Technology University of Waterloo, Waterloo ON
FW: Help....SA seems.......: SOLVED
Title: FW: HelpSA seems...: SOLVED Hi List. Please ignore my previous posting. Finger trouble cause the issue. Typo in my exim configuration file. Thanks Tom
Help....SA seems to have stopped working on most mail.
Title: HelpSA seems to have stopped working on most mail. Hi List. Don’t know if its only me but SA seems to have just stopped running. Could it be the Internet Headers Version 2.0 ? All was fine then nothing. I have insrtalled the latest version of SA but still nothing. Below are some headers. Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks Tom Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 Received: from jp-mx-1.mtnns.net ([209.212.97.2]) by bonsai.mtnns.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 23 Nov 2004 04:58:41 +0200 Received: from [67.138.22.182] (helo=67-138-22-182.dsl1.thw.in.frontiernet.net) by jp-mx-1.mtnns.net with smtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CWQtI-0001Aq-CY for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 04:58:53 +0200 Received: from 72.176.148.133 (HELO lists.warnerreprise.com) (193.128.80.228) by avas-mx91.yahoo.com with ESMTP id S131155AbUJINgX; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 10:36:23 -0700 Received: by yahoo.com with SMTP id 63so1911wri Received: by 248.112.88.252 with SMTP id 35mr2178aTvTvT; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 06:36:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 209.40.158.136 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 06:36:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 06:36:10 -0700 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "Duncan Koenig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: V'icod'in cheapp ! Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.138.22.182 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Nov 2004 02:58:41.0703 (UTC) FILETIME=[56A84B70:01C4D108] Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 Received: from jp-mx-1.mtnns.net ([209.212.97.2]) by bonsai.mtnns.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 23 Nov 2004 05:43:18 +0200 Received: from [24.160.72.96] (helo=cs2416072-96.houston.rr.com) by jp-mx-1.mtnns.net with smtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CWRaT-0001Fp-Ms; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 05:43:30 +0200 Received: from denunciate.iqiq.net ([128.68.136.132]) by candelabra.eazier.com (InterMail vK.4.04.00.00 489-363-177 license 2rt727vv9040v8ei8k2xan4842z3fiq4) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 08:43:12 +0500 Received: from diva ([225.151.15.89]) by denunciate.iqiq.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.14 (built Mar 13 2009)) with ESMTPA id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:34:12 +0600 (IDT) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "Leroy Randle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Dns-admin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: help your father with his pain - drink V+I-C+O:D+I;N Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 04:40:12 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_NextPart_968_3464_89C0QEBB.B07D7520" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.503 (Entity 5.501) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 24.160.72.96 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Nov 2004 03:43:18.0328 (UTC) FILETIME=[920CDB80:01C4D10E] --=_NextPart_968_3464_89C0QEBB.B07D7520 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --=_NextPart_968_3464_89C0QEBB.B07D7520 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable --=_NextPart_968_3464_89C0QEBB.B07D7520--
