RE: SURBL Rules Not Being Used
Found it. I hade two versions of Perl installed, spamassassin was picking up the test install I did of version 6. Which had no Net::DNS installed. Tim -Original Message- From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 9:25 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: SURBL Rules Not Being Used On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 09:08:28PM -0400, Timothy Spear wrote: > Any other ideas? The first thing for any issue is: run with -D and see what's happening. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "Q. Why is this so clumsy? A. The trick is to use Perl's strengths rather than its weaknesses." - Larry Wall
RE: SURBL Rules Not Being Used
I am running 0.53; straight from CPAN. Any other ideas? Tim -Original Message- From: Rick Macdougall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 8:13 PM To: Timothy Spear Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: SURBL Rules Not Being Used Timothy Spear wrote: >Hello, > The SURBL Rules do not appear to be working for me. I think I am >missing something basic. > > The test: > First Test: Telnet into my MTA and manually enter the SMTP >Commands to send an email from a bogus address, email content is the same as >the other tests. > Second Test: Using a local .eml file I have a hyper link to >http://test.surbl.org I then pass with file to either spamassassin or spamc > Third Test: Send an email from a yahoo account with the same >content. > > The "spamc -R" report from the first and second tests: > >pts rule name description > -- >-- >0.2 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name >-2.8 ALL_TRUSTEDDid not pass through any untrusted hosts >0.1 DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBLRBL: From: sender listed in dnsbl.ahbl.org > > > My Configuration: > Debian 3.1 > SpamAssassin 3.0.3-2 (From Debian) > Bind9 (from Debian) > Spamd started with " --max-children 5 --helper-home-dir" > > What I have tested: > Net::DNS is installed. Use a simple Perl Script to Test > DNS Resolving via the Bind9 works. > SpamAssassin is resolving the DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL rule. > No entry in local.cf for skip_rbl_checks, rbl_timeout > No changes to any scores. > >TIA > >Tim > > > Hi, Although it appears Net::DNS is working, what version is it ? I've never gotten 0.49 - 0.52 to work correctly. 0.48 and 0.53+ all work fine. HTH, Rick !DSPAM:42e82313202012322511209!
SURBL Rules Not Being Used
Hello, The SURBL Rules do not appear to be working for me. I think I am missing something basic. The test: First Test: Telnet into my MTA and manually enter the SMTP Commands to send an email from a bogus address, email content is the same as the other tests. Second Test: Using a local .eml file I have a hyper link to http://test.surbl.org I then pass with file to either spamassassin or spamc Third Test: Send an email from a yahoo account with the same content. The "spamc -R" report from the first and second tests: pts rule name description -- -- 0.2 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name -2.8 ALL_TRUSTEDDid not pass through any untrusted hosts 0.1 DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBLRBL: From: sender listed in dnsbl.ahbl.org My Configuration: Debian 3.1 SpamAssassin 3.0.3-2 (From Debian) Bind9 (from Debian) Spamd started with " --max-children 5 --helper-home-dir" What I have tested: Net::DNS is installed. Use a simple Perl Script to Test DNS Resolving via the Bind9 works. SpamAssassin is resolving the DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL rule. No entry in local.cf for skip_rbl_checks, rbl_timeout No changes to any scores. TIA Tim
