RE: Testing Spamassassin with the mail command

[Vincent Fleming]

OK Everyone - Send him your SPAM!!!

;-)

Just kidding...

I'm not sure what you're looking for from us.  Please be more specific.

By the way, I use Sendmail as well, and find the spamass-milter to be a
great way to link in spamassassin.  Also, the blacklists are very
effective.  If you need any assistance with the sendmail.mc entries
required, email me back.

Regards,

Vince

-Original Message-
From: StarkRavingCalm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 11:23 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Testing Spamassassin with the mail command


Hello. 
I am new to SpamAssasin. I have configured my new Sendmail server to use
Spamassassin and have tested with the usual commands: spamassassin -D <
/usr/share/doc/spamassassin-3.1.8/sample-spam.txt 

I want to test how the messages will look when delivered, so I can tweak
that. 

Thanks in advance!


-- 
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Testing-Spamassassin-with-the-mail-command-tf36393
90.html#a10163382
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

RE: Question on use of SpamCop plugin

[Vincent Fleming]

Regarding using this feature...

I currently have SA reformatting the spam as an attachment (default
behavior) - do I need to stop the attachment thing for spamcop or can I
just forward the messages as-is?


-Original Message-
From: Michael Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 3:06 PM
To: Steven W. Orr
Cc: Graham Murray; spamassassin-users
Subject: Re: Question on use of SpamCop plugin

Steven W. Orr wrote:
> What I've currently been using is this script:
> 
> #! /bin/bash
> exec tee >(mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]) | sa-learn --spam
> 
> Is there an advantage to using -r over what I have? (something like)
> exec tee >(spamassassin -r) | sa-learn 
> 

-r will also perform the sa-learn portion for you so no need to call it
separately.

Michael