Re: Trying to understand scoring discrepancy

2009-03-24 Thread mkellogg



That was indeed the case. Thank you.

Matt


Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> 
> 
> you apparently have a "score" line in user_prefs, or in system-wide
> directory, which prevails over those in SA rules dirs.
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Trying-to-understand-scoring-discrepancy-tp22663873p22682989.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



Trying to understand scoring discrepancy

2009-03-23 Thread mkellogg

Running spamc from the command line and generating the full report.

The full report reports the following:

Content analysis details:   (7.2 points, 6.3 required)

 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP4   TVD_RCVD_IP4
 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IPTVD_RCVD_IP
 2.6 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO  Received: contains an IP address used for HELO
 1.9 DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 Date: is 6 to 12 hours before Received: date
 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE   BODY: HTML included in message
 0.0 RDNS_NONE  Delivered to trusted network by a host with no
rDNS
 2.8 DOS_OE_TO_MX   Delivered direct to MX with OE headers

However, my score file has the following lines:
score TVD_RCVD_IP4 4.099 3.344 2.901 3.183 # n=2
score TVD_RCVD_IP 0.502 1.617 2.270 1.931 # n=2

This is SA 3.2.5 with rules I retreived from sa-update on 3/12/2009. I have
Bayes and RBLs disabled, so I would expect the first score to be used, but
clearly none of the scores are being used.

What does the n=2 at the end mean? Is it more than a comment?

Thanks,
Matt
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Trying-to-understand-scoring-discrepancy-tp22663873p22663873.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.