Re: A Central 'Rules' site?

[tbb]

 Original Message 
From: Evan Platt
To: spamassassin-users@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: A Central 'Rules' site?
Date: 20:19

Do you or anyone else have a more *doze friendly script? I have wget, 
cron and perl, so a lot of the other stuff in the rdj isn't needed - 
chmod, etc. Maybe a simple batch file that wget's the files?


Yes, in case you are using Win2k(3) or XP. Create a .bat, name it as you 
like and put the following in (watch line breaks):


::--batch start--

@echo off
for /F eol=; %%i in (saupdate.lst) do wget.exe -N --tries=2 %%i -P 
your rules dir


::--batch end--

Then create a file in the same dir as the .bat with all url's of files 
you like to update like:


http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/70_sare_header0.cf
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/70_sare_header1.cf
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/70_sare_header2.cf


and name it saupdate.lst or change the name in the example line as well. 
That's it.


Regards, Nico

--
+---+
- Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- No HTML mails please
+---+

Re: Webbi`s kleiner Datentoaster?

[tBB]

On 07.11.2004 at 07:00 Bernd Schmelter is rumoured to have written:

It seems so. The meaning of Webbi`s kleiner Datentoaster
is like Webmasters little datadestroyer

Actually some fantasy is needed to see a relation between either 'Webbi' and 
Webmaster or 'Datentoaster' and Data destroyer. His (ugly) page which can be 
obviously found at

http://webbi67.de.vu/

has hardly anything to do with destruction of data or cracking. The few cracks 
he offers are horribly outdated and surely not written by him. Instead  it 
seems that his nick is Webster therefore probably 'Webbi'. Besides, 
'Datentoaster' is a common generic abbreviation for computers in Germany.

Nico

+---+
- Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- No HTML mails please
+---+

Re: dnsbl lookups slow due to sleep 1 in code, plus patch

[tBB]

(FreeBSD 4.10 and Debian linux unstable), but this might have issues
on inferior OSes from the Evil Empire. I haven't checked this. If it
does, however, I suggest adding a test for $Config{'osname'} eq 'MSWin32',
and just calling sleep in that case.

The changes work equally well on the superior OS from the Evil Empire, Win2k ;) 
Can't speak for XP as I don't use such...err...thing.

Well done!


+---+
- Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- No HTML mails please
+---+

Re: AWL DoS?

[tBB]

On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 20:05:29 -0500
Jason J. Ellingson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I'm sure someone thought of this, but I don't see it asked before... so...
 =
 1) Person X regularly gets emails from Person Y (good friends)
 
 2) Person Z is a bad guy... so he sends Person X a GTUBE email with a faked
 FROM: address of Person Y.
 
 3) Now, GTUBE scores a 1000 points, and gets set to the AWL database.
 
 4) Future emails from Person Y to Person X now get tagged as spam since AWL
 keeps bumping up the score because of the GTUBE that was sent earlier.
 =
 I hope that makes sense...

I would suggest to simply set GTUBE to a very low score unless you
really want to test something.

+---+
- Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- No HTML mails please
+---+