Re: [sa-list] DSPAM-plugin for SpamAssassin 3.* ?
Kai Schaetzl wrote: Snowjack wrote on Sat, 25 Sep 2004 16:01:01 -0700: Actually, those numbers were from SA 2.64 with the URIDNSBL patch and most of the more conservative SARE rulesets. Didn't include BigEvil, of course, or any of the SARE rules that said they occasionally hit ham. When I just reduce to the rules coming with SA I still have more than 17 or 18 MB as you have, maybe 20. Adding a few SARE and some own rules and I'm at 40 - 50, bigevil adds another 40 or so to that. What Perl are you running? perl 5.6.1 ls /etc/spamassassin 70_sare_adult.cf 70_sare_bayes_poison_nxm.cf 70_sare_genlsubj0.cf 70_sare_genlsubj_x30.cf 70_sare_header0.cf 70_sare_html0.cf 70_sare_random.cf 70_sare_ratware.cf 70_sare_specific.cf 70_sare_spoof.cf 70_sare_unsub.cf 71_sare_redirect_pre3.0.0.cf 72_sare_bml_post25x.cf 99_sare_fraud_post25x.cf local.cf surbl.cf
Re: [sa-list] DSPAM-plugin for SpamAssassin 3.* ?
Snowjack wrote on Sat, 25 Sep 2004 16:01:01 -0700: > Actually, those numbers were from SA 2.64 with the URIDNSBL patch and > most of the more conservative SARE rulesets. Didn't include BigEvil, of > course, or any of the SARE rules that said they occasionally hit ham. > When I just reduce to the rules coming with SA I still have more than 17 or 18 MB as you have, maybe 20. Adding a few SARE and some own rules and I'm at 40 - 50, bigevil adds another 40 or so to that. What Perl are you running? Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org
Re: [sa-list] DSPAM-plugin for SpamAssassin 3.* ?
Kai Schaetzl wrote: Snowjack wrote on Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:08:38 -0700: Am I missing something? Yes, all the SARE and other custom rulesets ;-) (Just as a FYI, not as a critique). Actually, those numbers were from SA 2.64 with the URIDNSBL patch and most of the more conservative SARE rulesets. Didn't include BigEvil, of course, or any of the SARE rules that said they occasionally hit ham.
Re: [sa-list] DSPAM-plugin for SpamAssassin 3.* ?
Snowjack wrote on Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:08:38 -0700: > Am I missing something? > Yes, all the SARE and other custom rulesets ;-) (Just as a FYI, not as a critique). Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org
Re: [sa-list] DSPAM-plugin for SpamAssassin 3.* ?
Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote on Thu, 23 Sep 2004 00:41:42 +0300: > I just want to > know, how much faster SpamAssassin will be, if its Bayesian engine is > replaced with something else, > Not much. You are completely missing the point. If you want to have something faster and less ressource hungry (that's much more of an issue with SA than the "slowness") you have to code it COMPLETELY in C. I suggest you start tomorrow. > And I can hear it myself, when > hard disks make awful noise of swapping. Amen. Sorry, but I find your attitude quite unpleasant. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org
