A lot of spams go through, see example

2008-12-26 Thread Igor Chudov
http://igor.chudov.com/tmp/spam005.txt

I get a lot of these, all seemingly sent by the same software and the
same person, any way of filtering them out?

i


Re: A lot of spams go through, see example

2008-12-26 Thread Benny Pedersen

On Fri, December 26, 2008 20:06, Igor Chudov wrote:
 http://igor.chudov.com/tmp/spam005.txt

 I get a lot of these, all seemingly sent by the same software and
 the same person, any way of filtering them out?

add the domain to http://uribl.com/ (you need a login there)

currently http://newyearonline.info/ is not uribl listed

please do if this is spam for you and you are sure you did not
signup on that site

your spamassassin learn it as ham :(

can you make a

spamassassin 21 -D -t msg  spamtest.log

and paste spamtest.log to http://igor.chudov.com/tmp/ ?

-- 
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098



Re: A lot of spams go through, see example

2008-12-26 Thread Rob McEwen
Igor Chudov wrote:
 http://igor.chudov.com/tmp/spam005.txt

 I get a lot of these, all seemingly sent by the same software and the
 same person, any way of filtering them out?
   

The sending IP is currently blacklisted on FiveTenSig and ivmSIP/24.
Both of these are best used as scoring lists and not for outright
blocking. (though ivmSIP/24 could generally be scored rather high...
probably just below threshold.). Even when not used for outright
blocking, using either or both of these might have put the spam over
the top in combination with other things.

(Note that some consider FiveTenSig too risky to even score on. I
personally find FiveTenSig effective when adding about a point to the
spam score. But it may be that I'm somewhat insolated from FiveTenSig
FPs due to my vast IP whitelist?)

The domain name used by the spammer (newyearonline DOT info) is NOT
listed on either surbl or uribl (at the time that I type this), but was
blacklisted on ivmURI almost exactly two minutes *before* the spam
sample you provided reached your server. However, propagations issues
would have probably made this a just-barely-missed spam in terms of
ivmURI's ability to block this. Still, that ivmURI caught it so early is
noteworthy. It may me that ivmURI might be helpful for others of this
series of spams.

One thing is for sure, you are getting the tip edge of some
hard-to-catch snowshoe spam. You probably have some addresses at the
very beginning of some snowshoe spammer's distribution list.

-- 
Rob McEwen
http://dnsbl.invaluement.com/
r...@invaluement.com
+1 (478) 475-9032




Re: A lot of spams go through, see example

2008-12-26 Thread SM

At 11:06 26-12-2008, Igor Chudov wrote:

http://igor.chudov.com/tmp/spam005.txt

I get a lot of these, all seemingly sent by the same software and the
same person, any way of filtering them out?


Autolearning is categorizing that email as ham because of the zero 
score.  Turn off autolearning or reduce the score for autolearning 
ham until you fix this problem.


As a quick fix, add a header rule to catch the 
FreeCreditReports360.com in the From header.


Regards,
-sm 



Re: A lot of spams go through, see example

2008-12-26 Thread sebastian

Igor Chudov schrieb:

http://igor.chudov.com/tmp/spam005.txt

I get a lot of these, all seemingly sent by the same software and the
same person, any way of filtering them out?

i



perhaps you can check it whith http://www.openrbl.org and then you can 
modificate your config on your mail server


Re: A lot of spams go through, see example

2008-12-26 Thread Ned Slider

SM wrote:

At 11:06 26-12-2008, Igor Chudov wrote:

http://igor.chudov.com/tmp/spam005.txt

I get a lot of these, all seemingly sent by the same software and the
same person, any way of filtering them out?


Autolearning is categorizing that email as ham because of the zero 
score.  Turn off autolearning or reduce the score for autolearning ham 
until you fix this problem.




Yes, and manually train Bayes with them so that Bayes will catch them in 
future. I manually train Bayes on ALL spam passing through the system 
(as well as any misclassified ham) as autolearning misses many of the 
more difficult to catch spam examples.


On my system this example fails SPF and I see URIBL_BLACK is now 
catching it too.