A lot of these going around
May 18 11:50:22 d_baron spamc[5797]: connect(AF_INET) to spamd at 127.0.0.1 failed, retrying (#1 of 3): Connection refused Seems harmless though annoying. Fix?
Re: A lot of these going around
David Baron wrote: > May 18 11:50:22 d_baron spamc[5797]: connect(AF_INET) to spamd at 127.0.0.1 > failed, retrying (#1 of 3): Connection refused > > Seems harmless though annoying. > Fix? Is spamd running?
Re: A lot of these going around
On Thursday 18 May 2006 20:40, Matt Kettler wrote: > David Baron wrote: > > May 18 11:50:22 d_baron spamc[5797]: connect(AF_INET) to spamd at > > 127.0.0.1 failed, retrying (#1 of 3): Connection refused > > > > Seems harmless though annoying. > > Fix? > > Is spamd running? Of course.
Re: A lot of these going around
David Baron wrote: > On Thursday 18 May 2006 20:40, Matt Kettler wrote: >> David Baron wrote: >>> May 18 11:50:22 d_baron spamc[5797]: connect(AF_INET) to spamd at >>> 127.0.0.1 failed, retrying (#1 of 3): Connection refused >>> >>> Seems harmless though annoying. >>> Fix? >> Is spamd running? > > Of course. > Is spamd configured to allow connections from 127.0.0.1? (ie: what are you passing after the -A parameter to spamd?)
RE: A lot of these going around
Or maybe some "rejecting connection due to high load" messages in je system logs? From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 18-May-06 21:50 To: David Baron Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: A lot of these going around David Baron wrote: > On Thursday 18 May 2006 20:40, Matt Kettler wrote: >> David Baron wrote: >>> May 18 11:50:22 d_baron spamc[5797]: connect(AF_INET) to spamd at >>> 127.0.0.1 failed, retrying (#1 of 3): Connection refused >>> >>> Seems harmless though annoying. >>> Fix? >> Is spamd running? > > Of course. > Is spamd configured to allow connections from 127.0.0.1? (ie: what are you passing after the -A parameter to spamd?)
Re: A lot of these going around
On Thursday 18 May 2006 22:50, Matt Kettler wrote: > David Baron wrote: > > On Thursday 18 May 2006 20:40, Matt Kettler wrote: > >> David Baron wrote: > >>> May 18 11:50:22 d_baron spamc[5797]: connect(AF_INET) to spamd at > >>> 127.0.0.1 failed, retrying (#1 of 3): Connection refused > >>> > >>> Seems harmless though annoying. > >>> Fix? > >> > >> Is spamd running? > > > > Of course. > > Is spamd configured to allow connections from 127.0.0.1? > > (ie: what are you passing after the -A parameter to spamd?) There is no -A parameter used. 127.0.0.1 is "loopback". Do I need it (and why was it not placed on installation)?
Re: A lot of these going around
check the retry time and what os are u running pliz and the version you are using for spamassasin?On 5/18/06, David Baron < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:May 18 11:50:22 d_baron spamc[5797]: connect(AF_INET) to spamd at 127.0.0.1failed, retrying (#1 of 3): Connection refusedSeems harmless though annoying.Fix?-- Ronald NsubugaNetwork Engineer One2net Ltd-A Network of People & Technology-& Ronald says,Everything can be achieved as long you can do what it takes to achieve it!" The More Things Change The More Things Stay The Same " --
Re: A lot of these going around
On Thursday 18 May 2006 16:36, Ronald Nsubuga wrote: > check the retry time and what os are u running pliz and the version you are > using for spamassasin? > retries less than 1 minute. Debian Sid, SA 3.1.1
Re: A lot of these going around
>On Thursday 18 May 2006 16:36, Ronald Nsubuga wrote: >> check the retry time and what os are u running pliz and the version you are >> using for spamassasin? >> >retries less than 1 minute. Debian Sid, SA 3.1.1 Bunch of these error messages seem to happening every few (five?) hours.
