AW: Network tests slowing down spamassassin
Ramprasad wrote: > Hi, > SA works fine , for the quiet large setup that we have. ( we get upto > 200k mails an hour at peak times ) > But I notice it is too network dependent. A little problem with the > network and all hell breaks loose. Mailq shoots up and SA starts timing > out. > Probably because I have enabled all kinds of BL tests and uri checks. > But these checks are indispensable without these SA would have no teeth > at all. > > So what is the best way to reduce network traffic. We are already > getting the sbl-xbl lists from spamhaus so as to serve those lists > locally , can I get any other lists locally ? Commercial agreements > also are ok. > Hi, i think the best way to reduce the network traffic regarding to the network test is to do all network test locally. we are serving many list locally. For example spamhaus (commercial agreement),spamcop (one time fee), njabl, sorbs , cbl.abuseat, dsbl (all free). We are using a rbldnsd to serve all local lists. You have to create your own DNS zone and adapt your SA config. You will get faster response and the processing time decrease of each message, which is processed by the SA. Sorry for my bad english. Stefan
Re: AW: Network tests slowing down spamassassin
> Hi, > i think the best way to reduce the network traffic regarding to the network > test is to do all network test locally. > we are serving many list locally. For example spamhaus (commercial > agreement),spamcop (one time fee), njabl, sorbs , cbl.abuseat, dsbl (all > free). We are using a rbldnsd to serve all local lists. Thanks for the info We are already using local lists from spamhaus. spamcop $1000 / year is unreasonable I will try njabl cdbl and DSBL. Can you tell me where do I get lists from SORBS couldnt get anything on their site Thanks Ram
AW: AW: Network tests slowing down spamassassin
Hi, first you have to create an account on the sorbs site, after that you are able to open a ticket regarding to rsync subscription. A short summary why you want to use the rsync feed from sorbs (millione mails per day --> performance etc.) Ip addresses, which initiate the rsync and the sorbs admins are going to allow you the rsync. I hope i can help you ?? Stefan -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Ramprasad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Juli 2006 11:31 An: Stefan Klewer Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: Network tests slowing down spamassassin > Hi, > i think the best way to reduce the network traffic regarding to the network > test is to do all network test locally. > we are serving many list locally. For example spamhaus (commercial > agreement),spamcop (one time fee), njabl, sorbs , cbl.abuseat, dsbl (all > free). We are using a rbldnsd to serve all local lists. Thanks for the info We are already using local lists from spamhaus. spamcop $1000 / year is unreasonable I will try njabl cdbl and DSBL. Can you tell me where do I get lists from SORBS couldnt get anything on their site Thanks Ram
Re: AW: AW: Network tests slowing down spamassassin
Speaking of network tests... Other than "traditional" IP-address-based RBL lookups, SURBL/URIBL lookups, and network traffic for Razor, DCC, etc... is there anything ELSE for which a test requires network traffic which depends on a someone else's remote server that still runs even if/when SURBL/URIBL, Razor/DCC, and RBL lookups are ALL turned off? (for example, suppose that if ALL of these I mentioned above turned off, "No rDNS" is still tested for. If so, then "No rDNS" would be an example of what should be on the list that answers my question.) Thanks! Rob McEwen PowerView Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED]
