Re: AW: X-Spam Tagging - Spam Status YESNO Flags - Sometimes not appended...
On 26.09.16 10:21, Maik Linnemann wrote: Additional: i have a limited number of Mails that are still not tagged. those mails doesnt regard to the mail size limit scenario as they are for example between 35kb ans 100kb or so and i have a limit of 2MB. anyone have a clue how to figure out whats happening? conspicuous most of those mails have X_ on their external routing way. X_ is not important. Received: headers are. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. The 3 biggets disasters: Hiroshima 45, Tschernobyl 86, Windows 95
AW: AW: X-Spam Tagging - Spam Status YESNO Flags - Sometimes not appended...
Additional: i have a limited number of Mails that are still not tagged. those
mails doesnt regard to the mail size limit scenario as they are for example
between 35kb ans 100kb or so and i have a limit of 2MB. anyone have a clue how
to figure out whats happening?
conspicuous most of those mails have X_ on their external routing way.
With kind of regards,
Maik Linnemann
Von: Maik Linnemann
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. September 2016 13:49
An: Matus UHLAR - fantomas; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Betreff: AW: AW: X-Spam Tagging - Spam Status YESNO Flags - Sometimes not
appended...
Thank you very much. That works.
Von: Matus UHLAR - fantomas [uh...@fantomas.sk]
Gesendet: Montag, 19. September 2016 12:26
An: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: X-Spam Tagging - Spam Status YESNO Flags - Sometimes not
appended...
>On Fri, 16 Sep 2016, Maik Linnemann wrote:
>> SA is integrated into postix via master.cf like:
>> spamassassin unix - n n - - pipe
>> user=nobody argv=/usr/bin/spamc -f -e /usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f
>> ${sender} ${recipient}
>Please note the 'max-size' parameter for spamc:
>
> -s max_size, --max-size=max_size
On 17.09.16 10:34, Maik Linnemann wrote:
>Thanks! I checked that and it gave me a direction. Log says that messages
> skipped because of size limit which i haven't set and is still default
> (512000 bytes). On the other site I checked the messages that are not
> tagged and not all of them are bigger than 512kb. Anyway most of them
> are!
>
>I tried to set the -s option in /etc/default/spamassassin on debian to 1024000
>for a test, with no effect.
>
>Log still says its skipping due to the limit of 512000.
>
>Does anyone have a clue what needs to be done in debian?!
/etc/default/spamassassin contains options for spamassassin DAEMON, not for its
clients.
you must set the option for spamc in master.cf if you want it to apply.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Saving Private Ryan...
Private Ryan exists. Overwrite? (Y/N)
AW: AW: X-Spam Tagging - Spam Status YESNO Flags - Sometimes not appended...
Thank you very much. That works.
Von: Matus UHLAR - fantomas [uh...@fantomas.sk]
Gesendet: Montag, 19. September 2016 12:26
An: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: X-Spam Tagging - Spam Status YESNO Flags - Sometimes not
appended...
>On Fri, 16 Sep 2016, Maik Linnemann wrote:
>> SA is integrated into postix via master.cf like:
>> spamassassin unix - n n - - pipe
>> user=nobody argv=/usr/bin/spamc -f -e /usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f
>> ${sender} ${recipient}
>Please note the 'max-size' parameter for spamc:
>
> -s max_size, --max-size=max_size
On 17.09.16 10:34, Maik Linnemann wrote:
>Thanks! I checked that and it gave me a direction. Log says that messages
> skipped because of size limit which i haven't set and is still default
> (512000 bytes). On the other site I checked the messages that are not
> tagged and not all of them are bigger than 512kb. Anyway most of them
> are!
>
>I tried to set the -s option in /etc/default/spamassassin on debian to 1024000
>for a test, with no effect.
>
>Log still says its skipping due to the limit of 512000.
>
>Does anyone have a clue what needs to be done in debian?!
/etc/default/spamassassin contains options for spamassassin DAEMON, not for its
clients.
you must set the option for spamc in master.cf if you want it to apply.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Saving Private Ryan...
Private Ryan exists. Overwrite? (Y/N)
Re: AW: X-Spam Tagging - Spam Status YESNO Flags - Sometimes not appended...
On Fri, 16 Sep 2016, Maik Linnemann wrote:
SA is integrated into postix via master.cf like:
spamassassin unix - n n - - pipe
user=nobody argv=/usr/bin/spamc -f -e /usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f
${sender} ${recipient}
Please note the 'max-size' parameter for spamc:
-s max_size, --max-size=max_size
On 17.09.16 10:34, Maik Linnemann wrote:
Thanks! I checked that and it gave me a direction. Log says that messages
skipped because of size limit which i haven't set and is still default
(512000 bytes). On the other site I checked the messages that are not
tagged and not all of them are bigger than 512kb. Anyway most of them
are!
I tried to set the -s option in /etc/default/spamassassin on debian to 1024000
for a test, with no effect.
Log still says its skipping due to the limit of 512000.
Does anyone have a clue what needs to be done in debian?!
/etc/default/spamassassin contains options for spamassassin DAEMON, not for its
clients.
you must set the option for spamc in master.cf if you want it to apply.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Saving Private Ryan...
Private Ryan exists. Overwrite? (Y/N)
AW: AW: X-Spam Tagging - Spam Status YESNO Flags - Sometimes not appended...
Thanks! I checked that and it gave me a direction. Log says that messages
skipped because of size limit which i haven't set and is still default (512000
bytes). On the other site I checked the messages that are not tagged and not
all of them are bigger than 512kb. Anyway most of them are!
I tried to set the -s option in /etc/default/spamassassin on debian to 1024000
for a test, with no effect.
Log still says its skipping due to the limit of 512000.
Does anyone have a clue what needs to be done in debian?!
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: David B Funk [mailto:dbf...@engineering.uiowa.edu]
Gesendet: Freitag, 16. September 2016 18:18
An: Maik Linnemann <maik.linnem...@provit.info>
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: X-Spam Tagging - Spam Status YESNO Flags - Sometimes not
appended...
What do you see in your syslog reports from spamc?
Is it reporting any errors?
Please note the 'max-size' parameter for spamc:
-s max_size, --max-size=max_size
Set the maximum message size which will be sent to spamd -- any bigger
than
this threshold and the message will be returned unprocessed (default:
500 KB).
If spamc gets handed a message bigger than this, it won't be passed to
spamd.
The maximum message size is 256 MB.
So any message larger than that parameter (default 500KB) will be silently
bypassed as far as spamd processing is concerned.
Note, do not make that a large number in an attempt to process -everything-
unless you have a beefy (lots of RAM & CPU) machine for your spamd processing.
On Fri, 16 Sep 2016, Maik Linnemann wrote:
> SA is integrated into postix via master.cf like:
>
> ==
> # service type private unpriv chroot wakeup maxproc command + args
> # (yes) (yes) (yes) (never) (100)
> # ==
> smtp inet n - - - - smtpd
> -o content_filter=spamassassin
>
> spamassassin unix - n n - - pipe
> user=nobody argv=/usr/bin/spamc -f -e /usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f
> ${sender} ${recipient}
>
> i dont have milter or amavis in place. av scanning is done in the backend,
> where i would say the tagging should already be done (and mostly its the
> case!)
>
>
> Von: li...@rhsoft.net [li...@rhsoft.net]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 16. September 2016 15:52
> An: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: X-Spam Tagging - Spam Status YESNO Flags - Sometimes not
> appended...
>
> Am 16.09.2016 um 14:49 schrieb Maik Linnemann:
>> So far so good. The concept works like it should with only one
>> exception: Some mails are not tagged by spamassassin and i dont have a
>> clue why. Viscerally i would say its about 20% of all mails that arent
>> tagged by spamassassin
--
Dave Funk University of Iowa
College of Engineering
319/335-5751 FAX: 319/384-0549 1256 Seamans Center
Sys_admin/Postmaster/cell_adminIowa City, IA 52242-1527
#include
Better is not better, 'standard' is better. B{
Re: AW: X-Spam Tagging - Spam Status YESNO Flags - Sometimes not appended...
What do you see in your syslog reports from spamc?
Is it reporting any errors?
Please note the 'max-size' parameter for spamc:
-s max_size, --max-size=max_size
Set the maximum message size which will be sent to spamd -- any bigger
than
this threshold and the message will be returned unprocessed (default: 500
KB).
If spamc gets handed a message bigger than this, it won't be passed to
spamd.
The maximum message size is 256 MB.
So any message larger than that parameter (default 500KB) will be silently
bypassed as far as spamd processing is concerned.
Note, do not make that a large number in an attempt to process -everything-
unless you have a beefy (lots of RAM & CPU) machine for your spamd processing.
On Fri, 16 Sep 2016, Maik Linnemann wrote:
SA is integrated into postix via master.cf like:
==
# service type private unpriv chroot wakeup maxproc command + args
# (yes) (yes) (yes) (never) (100)
# ==
smtp inet n - - - - smtpd
-o content_filter=spamassassin
spamassassin unix - n n - - pipe
user=nobody argv=/usr/bin/spamc -f -e /usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f
${sender} ${recipient}
i dont have milter or amavis in place. av scanning is done in the backend,
where i would say the tagging should already be done (and mostly its the
case!)
Von: li...@rhsoft.net [li...@rhsoft.net]
Gesendet: Freitag, 16. September 2016 15:52
An: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Betreff: Re: X-Spam Tagging - Spam Status YESNO Flags - Sometimes not
appended...
Am 16.09.2016 um 14:49 schrieb Maik Linnemann:
So far so good. The concept works like it should with only one
exception: Some mails are not tagged by spamassassin and i dont have a
clue why. Viscerally i would say its about 20% of all mails that arent
tagged by spamassassin
--
Dave Funk University of Iowa
College of Engineering
319/335-5751 FAX: 319/384-0549 1256 Seamans Center
Sys_admin/Postmaster/cell_adminIowa City, IA 52242-1527
#include
Better is not better, 'standard' is better. B{
AW: X-Spam Tagging - Spam Status YESNO Flags - Sometimes not appended...
SA is integrated into postix via master.cf like:
==
# service type private unpriv chroot wakeup maxproc command + args
# (yes) (yes) (yes) (never) (100)
# ==
smtp inet n - - - - smtpd
-o content_filter=spamassassin
spamassassin unix - n n - - pipe
user=nobody argv=/usr/bin/spamc -f -e /usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f
${sender} ${recipient}
i dont have milter or amavis in place. av scanning is done in the backend,
where i would say the tagging should already be done (and mostly its the
case!)
Von: li...@rhsoft.net [li...@rhsoft.net]
Gesendet: Freitag, 16. September 2016 15:52
An: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Betreff: Re: X-Spam Tagging - Spam Status YESNO Flags - Sometimes not
appended...
Am 16.09.2016 um 14:49 schrieb Maik Linnemann:
> So far so good. The concept works like it should with only one
> exception: Some mails are not tagged by spamassassin and i dont have a
> clue why. Viscerally i would say its about 20% of all mails that arent
> tagged by spamassassin
how is SA integrated in your mailsystem?
that a very important question because the glue like as example
spamass-milter or amavis can skip SA completly depending on it's
configuration
