RE: Bypass URI check
> -Original Message- > From: Daryl C. W. O'Shea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 5:32 PM > To: Carnegie, Martin > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: Bypass URI check > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I have received a few messages like the following. This asks the > > receiver to copy and past the link into their web browser. > Since the > > href is missing, there is no URI check. That sucks, > because the URIBL > > is my best friend right now (love black). We are close to > marking it > > and URIBL would have definitely got it over. Any ideas on handling > > this? > > SpamAssassin 3.1.0 will catch these. Depending on your > environment you > could consider running 3.1.0-pre3. > > Daryl > > It is good to hear that 3.1.0 will catch these. I cannot go to the pre releases so I will have to was for GA. Thanks for the info.
Re: Bypass URI check
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, I have received a few messages like the following. This asks the receiver to copy and past the link into their web browser. Since the href is missing, there is no URI check. That sucks, because the URIBL is my best friend right now (love black). We are close to marking it and URIBL would have definitely got it over. Any ideas on handling this? SpamAssassin 3.1.0 will catch these. Depending on your environment you could consider running 3.1.0-pre3. Daryl
RE: Bypass URI check
Title: Bypass URI check I'm thinking it may be time for SARE to look at this phrase: "then copy // paste the below page into your window: " I'll see what I can do with it. --Chris (I also love the black ;) -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 10:42 AMTo: users@spamassassin.apache.orgSubject: Bypass URI check Hi All, I have received a few messages like the following. This asks the receiver to copy and past the link into their web browser. Since the href is missing, there is no URI check. That sucks, because the URIBL is my best friend right now (love black). We are close to marking it and URIBL would have definitely got it over. Any ideas on handling this? Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 Received: from .atco.ca ([xxx.xxx.10.122]) by .atco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Mon, 11 Jul 2005 08:01:29 -0600 Received: from .atco.ca ([xxx.xxx.10.122]) by .atco.ca (SMSSMTP 4.0.0.59) with SMTP id M2005071108012819018 ; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 08:01:28 -0600 Received: from [58.224.196.19] (helo=xxx.xxx.10.122) by .atco.ca with smtp (Exim ) id 1Dryqd-0001kd-Sa; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 08:01:28 -0600 X-Orcpt: rfc727;zmailer-log Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 10:58:46 -0400 From: "Joan Kerry " To: "Joan Kerry " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Appetie Suppresant Mon, 11 Jul 2005 07:04:46 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--4.AMLHjl9J5.pLVdgIYrJD9" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on .atco.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.3 required=5.0 tests=J_CHICKENPOX_55,MANGLED_STOP, RCVD_HELO_IP_MISMATCH,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jul 2005 14:01:29.0016 (UTC) FILETIME=[08D53380:01C58621] 4.AMLHjl9J5.pLVdgIYrJD9 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit 4.AMLHjl9J5.pLVdgIYrJD9 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit 4.AMLHjl9J5.pLVdgIYrJD9-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do you find it difficult to cut down on delicious foods filled with carbs? such as pasta,cakes,breads,potato chips and ice cream? if you are one of the people...then copy // paste the below page into your window: slimfat.info Kindly, Joan Kerry - 2refrain: s-t-o-p.info
Bypass URI check
Title: Bypass URI check Hi All, I have received a few messages like the following. This asks the receiver to copy and past the link into their web browser. Since the href is missing, there is no URI check. That sucks, because the URIBL is my best friend right now (love black). We are close to marking it and URIBL would have definitely got it over. Any ideas on handling this? Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 Received: from .atco.ca ([xxx.xxx.10.122]) by .atco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Mon, 11 Jul 2005 08:01:29 -0600 Received: from .atco.ca ([xxx.xxx.10.122]) by .atco.ca (SMSSMTP 4.0.0.59) with SMTP id M2005071108012819018 ; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 08:01:28 -0600 Received: from [58.224.196.19] (helo=xxx.xxx.10.122) by .atco.ca with smtp (Exim ) id 1Dryqd-0001kd-Sa; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 08:01:28 -0600 X-Orcpt: rfc727;zmailer-log Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 10:58:46 -0400 From: "Joan Kerry " To: "Joan Kerry " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Appetie Suppresant Mon, 11 Jul 2005 07:04:46 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--4.AMLHjl9J5.pLVdgIYrJD9" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on .atco.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.3 required=5.0 tests=J_CHICKENPOX_55,MANGLED_STOP, RCVD_HELO_IP_MISMATCH,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jul 2005 14:01:29.0016 (UTC) FILETIME=[08D53380:01C58621] 4.AMLHjl9J5.pLVdgIYrJD9 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit 4.AMLHjl9J5.pLVdgIYrJD9 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit 4.AMLHjl9J5.pLVdgIYrJD9-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do you find it difficult to cut down on delicious foods filled with carbs? such as pasta,cakes,breads,potato chips and ice cream? if you are one of the people...then copy // paste the below page into your window: slimfat.info Kindly, Joan Kerry - 2refrain: s-t-o-p.info
