Re: CALL FOR HELP: Rules UPDATE version 1732039 *may* be broken

2016-02-25 Thread John Hardin

On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Bill Cole wrote:

I haven't had much time for analysis of this yet and likely will not today , 
but last night's update is missing a number of 'describe' lines (e.g. 
TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY, TVD_FROM_1) previously in 72_active.cf.


Someone with more than 10 minutes to spare today and clues about the rules 
update process should look into this.


That may be due to an error in a rule change commit I made. If so, the 
next update (tonight) will fix it.


If that's indeed the cause, I'm surprised that masscheck proceeded in the 
face of a failed lint and that an error in one standalone rule affected a 
bunch of totally unrelated rules...


--
 John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
 jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
 key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
---
 66 days since the first successful real return to launch site (SpaceX)


CALL FOR HELP: Rules UPDATE version 1732039 *may* be broken

2016-02-25 Thread Bill Cole
I haven't had much time for analysis of this yet and likely will not 
today , but last night's update is missing a number of 'describe' lines 
(e.g. TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY, TVD_FROM_1) previously in 72_active.cf.


Someone with more than 10 minutes to spare today and clues about the 
rules update process should look into this.