I rely on Fuzzy OCR for some messages. I get some with Viagra/Cialis images, and just garbage text in the message. Other than FuzzyOCR, nothing usually scores.
Thomas E. Casartello, Jr. Staff Assistant - Wireless Technician/Linux Administrator Information Technology Wilson 105A Westfield State College Red Hat Certified Technician (RHCT) -----Original Message----- From: Jo Rhett [mailto:jrh...@netconsonance.com] Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 6:07 PM To: Dan Mahoney, System Admin Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: [sa-list] Re: A rant about FUZZY_OCR On Apr 27, 2009, at 1:16 PM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: > The problem exists now, there is PNG spam, and there will continue > to be, because it gets through. Right now the only way I find this > blocked is if spamcop blocks it. Just as a point of reference, I'd like to note that we haven't bothered with FuzzyOCR here and absolute none of the spam which reaches my inbox is a PNG or JPG or GIF spam. SA does block it, and it does so without FuzzyOCR. That said, we have jacked the scores for e-mail with images and no text and that might be why. We never, ever receive valid e-mail with no text in it. -- Jo Rhett Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source and other randomness
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
