Re: Individual SURBL lists to be shut down on public nameservers February 28, 2009. Use multi.

2009-03-01 Thread Jeff Chan
On 3/1/09, Jeff Chan je...@surbl.org wrote:
 For historical reasons, the SURBL public nameservers were serving
  individual lists ab, sc, ob and ws in addition to multi.  However
  these individual lists have all been deprecated in favor of multi for
  several years since multi contains all lists.  Traffic for the
  individual lists is relatively very low, and no one should be using
  them any more, so in order to reduce unnecessary and redundant network
  traffic we will be turning off public nameservice for the individual
  lists on February 28th, 2009.

  Everyone should be using multi.surbl.org instead, and this has been
  the case for many years now.  Therefore if anyone is using the
  individual lists, please stop doing so and use multi instead.  A
  single query to multi will check all SURBL lists.

   http://www.surbl.org/lists.html

Per the earlier announcement, the individual list zones have been
undelegated.  Please use multi.surbl.org, which is now the only
production list.

SpamAssassin versions 3 and later correctly use multi by default.
Earlier versions of SpamAssassin should probably be upgraded to
version 3.

Cheers,

Jeff C.


Re: Individual SURBL lists to be shut down on public nameservers February 28, 2009. Use multi.

2009-02-08 Thread Gregory P. Ennis
 

On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 11:43 -0800, Jeff Chan wrote:
 On Wednesday, February 4, 2009, 9:14:58 AM, Andre Andre wrote:
 
  Does that require changes to spamassassin or is it using multi already
  (3.2.5 used here)?
 
  My stats report those:
  URIBL_JP_SURBL
  URIBL_AB_SURBL
  URIBL_SC_SURBL
  URIBL_OB_SURBL
  URIBL_WS_SURBL
 
  No report of multi in there but lots of individuals...
 
 No changes are needed.  Any versions of SpamAssassin within the
 past 3 years use multi by default.  Any SpamAssassin version 3 or
 later should be ok.
 
 There are a very few queries to the individual lists.  I suppose
 it could be some very old installations of version 2.6.  They
 should almost certainly upgrade to something more recent.

 Jeff C.


Jeff,

Sorry to ask a basic question but is this feature activated with:

# URIDNSBL - look up URLs found in the message against several DNS
# blocklists.
#
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL

Greg


Re: Individual SURBL lists to be shut down on public nameservers February 28, 2009. Use multi.

2009-02-08 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  On Wednesday, February 4, 2009, 9:14:58 AM, Andre Andre wrote:
  
   Does that require changes to spamassassin or is it using multi already
   (3.2.5 used here)?
  
   My stats report those:
   URIBL_JP_SURBL
   URIBL_AB_SURBL
   URIBL_SC_SURBL
   URIBL_OB_SURBL
   URIBL_WS_SURBL
  
   No report of multi in there but lots of individuals...

 On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 11:43 -0800, Jeff Chan wrote:
  No changes are needed.  Any versions of SpamAssassin within the
  past 3 years use multi by default.  Any SpamAssassin version 3 or
  later should be ok.
  
  There are a very few queries to the individual lists.  I suppose
  it could be some very old installations of version 2.6.  They
  should almost certainly upgrade to something more recent.

On 08.02.09 11:23, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
 Sorry to ask a basic question but is this feature activated with:
 
 # URIDNSBL - look up URLs found in the message against several DNS
 # blocklists.
 #
 loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL

this urns on the whole functionality of using URI blacklists.
The original problem is only about SURBL.
-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
The box said 'Requires Windows 95 or better', so I bought a Macintosh.


Re: Individual SURBL lists to be shut down on public nameservers February 28, 2009. Use multi.

2009-02-08 Thread Gregory P. Ennis
 

On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 18:38 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
   On Wednesday, February 4, 2009, 9:14:58 AM, Andre Andre wrote:
   
Does that require changes to spamassassin or is it using multi already
(3.2.5 used here)?
   
My stats report those:
URIBL_JP_SURBL
URIBL_AB_SURBL
URIBL_SC_SURBL
URIBL_OB_SURBL
URIBL_WS_SURBL
   
No report of multi in there but lots of individuals...
 
  On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 11:43 -0800, Jeff Chan wrote:
   No changes are needed.  Any versions of SpamAssassin within the
   past 3 years use multi by default.  Any SpamAssassin version 3 or
   later should be ok.
   
   There are a very few queries to the individual lists.  I suppose
   it could be some very old installations of version 2.6.  They
   should almost certainly upgrade to something more recent.
 
 On 08.02.09 11:23, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
  Sorry to ask a basic question but is this feature activated with:
  
  # URIDNSBL - look up URLs found in the message against several DNS
  # blocklists.
  #
  loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL
 
 this urns on the whole functionality of using URI blacklists.
 The original problem is only about SURBL.

Thanks for the response.  How can I determine if SURBL is turned on?



Re: Individual SURBL lists to be shut down on public nameservers February 28, 2009. Use multi.

2009-02-08 Thread mouss
Gregory P. Ennis a écrit :
  [snip]
 
 Thanks for the response.  How can I determine if SURBL is turned on?
 

SURBL is probably turned on.

you can run spamassassin with the -D flag.

you can also look in SA files to see if it using multi.surbl.org. if
using sa-update, look in
/var/(db|lib)/spamassassin/${version}/updates_spamassassin_org/*.cf


to disable surbl (all or a few), use

meta URIBL_AB_SURBL (0)
meta URIBL_JP_SURBL (0)
meta URIBL_OB_SURBL (0)
meta URIBL_PH_SURBL (0)
meta URIBL_SC_SURBL (0)
meta URIBL_WS_SURBL (0)
meta URIBL_XS_SURBL (0)

(the last one has been removed from SA).






Re: Individual SURBL lists to be shut down on public nameservers February 28, 2009. Use multi.

2009-02-08 Thread Jeff Chan
On Sunday, February 8, 2009, 2:25:15 PM, mouss mouss wrote:
 Gregory P. Ennis a écrit :
  [snip]
 
 Thanks for the response.  How can I determine if SURBL is turned on?
 

 SURBL is probably turned on.

 you can run spamassassin with the -D flag.

 you can also look in SA files to see if it using multi.surbl.org. if
 using sa-update, look in
 /var/(db|lib)/spamassassin/${version}/updates_spamassassin_org/*.cf


 to disable surbl (all or a few), use

 meta URIBL_AB_SURBL (0)
 meta URIBL_JP_SURBL (0)
 meta URIBL_OB_SURBL (0)
 meta URIBL_PH_SURBL (0)
 meta URIBL_SC_SURBL (0)
 meta URIBL_WS_SURBL (0)
 meta URIBL_XS_SURBL (0)

 (the last one has been removed from SA).

Which is true, but not really the appropriate answer for the
original issue.

Only people who are running SpamAssassin 2.6 would need to make
changes to use multi.surbl.org, namedly to upgrade to
SpamAssassin 3

Jeff C.
-- 
Jeff Chan
mailto:je...@surbl.org
http://www.surbl.org/



Individual SURBL lists to be shut down on public nameservers February 28, 2009. Use multi.

2009-02-04 Thread Jeff Chan
For historical reasons, the SURBL public nameservers were serving
individual lists ab, sc, ob and ws in addition to multi.  However
these individual lists have all been deprecated in favor of multi for
several years since multi contains all lists.  Traffic for the
individual lists is relatively very low, and no one should be using
them any more, so in order to reduce unnecessary and redundant network
traffic we will be turning off public nameservice for the individual
lists on February 28th, 2009.

Everyone should be using multi.surbl.org instead, and this has been
the case for many years now.  Therefore if anyone is using the
individual lists, please stop doing so and use multi instead.  A
single query to multi will check all SURBL lists.

  http://www.surbl.org/lists.html

Cheers,

Jeff C.


Re: Individual SURBL lists to be shut down on public nameservers February 28, 2009. Use multi.

2009-02-04 Thread Andre


On Wed, 4 Feb 2009, Jeff Chan wrote:

 For historical reasons, the SURBL public nameservers were serving
 individual lists ab, sc, ob and ws in addition to multi.  However
 these individual lists have all been deprecated in favor of multi for
 several years since multi contains all lists.  Traffic for the
 individual lists is relatively very low, and no one should be using
 them any more, so in order to reduce unnecessary and redundant network
 traffic we will be turning off public nameservice for the individual
 lists on February 28th, 2009.

 Everyone should be using multi.surbl.org instead, and this has been
 the case for many years now.  Therefore if anyone is using the
 individual lists, please stop doing so and use multi instead.  A
 single query to multi will check all SURBL lists.

   http://www.surbl.org/lists.html

Does that require changes to spamassassin or is it using multi already
(3.2.5 used here)?

My stats report those:
URIBL_JP_SURBL
URIBL_AB_SURBL
URIBL_SC_SURBL
URIBL_OB_SURBL
URIBL_WS_SURBL

No report of multi in there but lots of individuals...

Thanks,
-andre


 Cheers,

 Jeff C.




RE: Individual SURBL lists to be shut down on public nameservers February 28, 2009. Use multi.

2009-02-04 Thread Randal, Phil
A grep -r -i of your rules directories is the way to go.

SA 3.2.5 uses multi.

Unless you've put in your own custom rules you should be OK.

Cheers,

Phil

--
Phil Randal | Networks Engineer
Herefordshire Council | Deputy Chief Executive's Office | I.C.T.
Services Division
Thorn Office Centre, Rotherwas, Hereford, HR2 6JT
Tel: 01432 260160
email: pran...@herefordshire.gov.uk

Any opinion expressed in this e-mail or any attached files are those of
the individual and not necessarily those of Herefordshire Council.

This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and intended solely
for the use of the addressee. This communication may contain material
protected by law from being passed on. If you are not the intended
recipient and have received this e-mail in error, you are advised that
any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please
contact the sender immediately and destroy all copies of it.

-Original Message-
From: Andre [mailto:an...@rvm.hostnix.com] 
Sent: 04 February 2009 17:15
To: Jeff Chan
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Individual SURBL lists to be shut down on public
nameservers February 28, 2009. Use multi.



On Wed, 4 Feb 2009, Jeff Chan wrote:

 For historical reasons, the SURBL public nameservers were serving 
 individual lists ab, sc, ob and ws in addition to multi.  However 
 these individual lists have all been deprecated in favor of multi for 
 several years since multi contains all lists.  Traffic for the 
 individual lists is relatively very low, and no one should be using 
 them any more, so in order to reduce unnecessary and redundant network

 traffic we will be turning off public nameservice for the individual 
 lists on February 28th, 2009.

 Everyone should be using multi.surbl.org instead, and this has been 
 the case for many years now.  Therefore if anyone is using the 
 individual lists, please stop doing so and use multi instead.  A 
 single query to multi will check all SURBL lists.

   http://www.surbl.org/lists.html

Does that require changes to spamassassin or is it using multi already
(3.2.5 used here)?

My stats report those:
URIBL_JP_SURBL
URIBL_AB_SURBL
URIBL_SC_SURBL
URIBL_OB_SURBL
URIBL_WS_SURBL

No report of multi in there but lots of individuals...

Thanks,
-andre


 Cheers,

 Jeff C.




Re: Individual SURBL lists to be shut down on public nameservers February 28, 2009. Use multi.

2009-02-04 Thread Jeff Chan
On Wednesday, February 4, 2009, 9:14:58 AM, Andre Andre wrote:

 Does that require changes to spamassassin or is it using multi already
 (3.2.5 used here)?

 My stats report those:
 URIBL_JP_SURBL
 URIBL_AB_SURBL
 URIBL_SC_SURBL
 URIBL_OB_SURBL
 URIBL_WS_SURBL

 No report of multi in there but lots of individuals...

No changes are needed.  Any versions of SpamAssassin within the
past 3 years use multi by default.  Any SpamAssassin version 3 or
later should be ok.

There are a very few queries to the individual lists.  I suppose
it could be some very old installations of version 2.6.  They
should almost certainly upgrade to something more recent.

Jeff C.
-- 
Jeff Chan
mailto:je...@surbl.org
http://www.surbl.org/