Re: Message Vs Batch mode processing ..
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 02:01:00PM -0400 or thereabouts, Theo Van Dinter wrote: On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 08:59:08PM +1300, Adam Bogacki wrote: Thanks for the advice Theo .. I've registered with razor and am now reporting spam regularly and saving to folder 'Spam'. :) However, I'm a bit frustrated having to do this 'message by message' with downloads averaging around 1-200. I am impressed that Sylpheed-Claws-GTK2 (with SA ClamAV plugins) munches away at the whole downloaded batch and delivers it spam-free. I'd prefer to understand what is happening under the hood - could you point me in the direction of how I can do this via CLI with Mutt ? I'm not really sure what you're asking here. Doing batch processing isn't hard with SpamAssassin, do something like: spamassassin --mbox messages.mbox messages-out.mbox If you want to use spamc/spamd, you have to go per message since spamc only understands single messages. Ala: formail -s spamc messages.mbox messages-out.mbox If you want SA to run over a message, and then have some filtering going on (ie: spams to one folder, etc,) you'd have to do some kind of formail/procmail thing to break a mailbox apart, process it through SA, then filter it. -- Randomly Selected Tagline: Al is a very busy person, as is most everyone else on helpdesk. They might even be more busy than Microsoft engineers who have much higher salaries, and have time for nerf gun battles and pillow fights in the halls. - Paul English Sorry Theo, I think I owe you an apology, Running 'sylpheed-claws-gtk2 --receive --debug' I realised it was processing by message, not 'by batch'. Nevertheless your suggestion is worth pursuing - as soon as I work out why my procmail logs are not working. Cheers, Adam. -- Adam Bogacki, - email: afb(at)paradise.net.nz VoIP: sip:agike(at)ekiga.net [Zfone] Key: 0x4E553910 - DABB 4963 8973 7CCD 33C0 DC27 D7C5 F516 4E55 3910 Key Servers: hkp://pgp.mit.edu:1137 ldap://keyserver.pgp.com - signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Message Vs Batch mode processing ..
Thanks for the advice Theo .. I've registered with razor and am now reporting spam regularly and saving to folder 'Spam'. However, I'm a bit frustrated having to do this 'message by message' with downloads averaging around 1-200. I am impressed that Sylpheed-Claws-GTK2 (with SA ClamAV plugins) munches away at the whole downloaded batch and delivers it spam-free. I'd prefer to understand what is happening under the hood - could you point me in the direction of how I can do this via CLI with Mutt ? Cheers, -- Adam Bogacki, - email: afb(at)paradise.net.nz VoIP: sip:agike(at)ekiga.net [Zfone] Key: 0x4E553910 - DABB 4963 8973 7CCD 33C0 DC27 D7C5 F516 4E55 3910 Key Servers: hkp://pgp.mit.edu:1137 ldap://keyserver.pgp.com - signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Message Vs Batch mode processing ..
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 08:59:08PM +1300, Adam Bogacki wrote: Thanks for the advice Theo .. I've registered with razor and am now reporting spam regularly and saving to folder 'Spam'. :) However, I'm a bit frustrated having to do this 'message by message' with downloads averaging around 1-200. I am impressed that Sylpheed-Claws-GTK2 (with SA ClamAV plugins) munches away at the whole downloaded batch and delivers it spam-free. I'd prefer to understand what is happening under the hood - could you point me in the direction of how I can do this via CLI with Mutt ? I'm not really sure what you're asking here. Doing batch processing isn't hard with SpamAssassin, do something like: spamassassin --mbox messages.mbox messages-out.mbox If you want to use spamc/spamd, you have to go per message since spamc only understands single messages. Ala: formail -s spamc messages.mbox messages-out.mbox If you want SA to run over a message, and then have some filtering going on (ie: spams to one folder, etc,) you'd have to do some kind of formail/procmail thing to break a mailbox apart, process it through SA, then filter it. -- Randomly Selected Tagline: Al is a very busy person, as is most everyone else on helpdesk. They might even be more busy than Microsoft engineers who have much higher salaries, and have time for nerf gun battles and pillow fights in the halls. - Paul English pgpRoQuFOVqup.pgp Description: PGP signature
