Re: New distribution rule not working ?

[Matthias Leisi]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1



Luis Hernán Otegui schrieb:

 In a spammail I found this rule :
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4
 [..]
 good reputation (or a medium one, lithe the header says). IMHO, you
 should report this message to the admin of that server, to alert him
 about the event.

Or just forward the message (headers intact) to admins -at- dnswl.org,
with a subject like false positive or similar. Not a lot of additional
comment is needed.

Thanks,
- -- Matthias
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFG9LlnxbHw2nyi/okRAnOOAJsHy0oWADxx+GDDBy0XB9arKz2bSgCgjPdM
5RXisXB09cs7oTMgz8FoVz0=
=5tq6
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

New distribution rule not working ?

[Richard Smits]

Hi,

In a spammail I found this rule :
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4

But it is a spammail. I have never seen this rule before. Looks like a
DNS Whitelist ?

Greetings... Richard Smits

Re: New distribution rule not working ?

[Luis Hernán Otegui]

2007/9/21, Richard Smits [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 Hi,

 In a spammail I found this rule :
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4
The DNSWL check went stock over sa-update some time ago. However, it
might happen that some spam could get passed through a server with a
good reputation (or a medium one, lithe the header says). IMHO, you
should report this message to the admin of that server, to alert him
about the event.
More info on this subject:

http://www.dnswl.org

Regards,

Luis

 But it is a spammail. I have never seen this rule before. Looks like a
 DNS Whitelist ?

 Greetings... Richard Smits



-- 
-
GNU-GPL: May The Source Be With You...
Linux Registered User #448382.
When I grow up, I wanna be like Theo...
-