New image spams
Well I'm not sure about new but the image spam seems to be back on again after a long absence: http://pastebin.com/d6d840f09 Same issues/filtering techniques as before. These do seem to be doing a pretty good job of clobbering Bayes filtering though. Chris - Chris Owen - Garden City (620) 275-1900 - Lottery (noun): President - Wichita (316) 858-3000 -A stupidity tax Hubris Communications Inc www.hubris.net -
Re: New image spams
Hi, Well I'm not sure about new but the image spam seems to be back on again after a long absence: http://pastebin.com/d6d840f09 Yes, a few here too. Can you explain your rules? I haven't seen some of these before: X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.0 required=6.0 tests=BAYES_50, DYN_RDNS_AND_INLINE_IMAGE,HC_U7KFR6ZI4F_ZYNT_16Y,RCVD_IN_APEWS, RCVD_IN_PBL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_HTTP,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no Do you have enough to look for uniqueness in the headers? Why is your score 6.0? Thanks, Alex
Re: New image spams
On Dec 7, 2009, at 11:37 AM, Alex wrote: Yes, a few here too. Can you explain your rules? Nothing magical but I'll send you a response offlist. Why is your score 6.0? Not my score. It is a customer's score. They can set them at anything they want (well anything 3 and above). Chris - Chris Owen - Garden City (620) 275-1900 - Lottery (noun): President - Wichita (316) 858-3000 -A stupidity tax Hubris Communications Inc www.hubris.net -
New image spams
I'm sure I'm not the first to see them but I hadn't seen a post here. The pharma image spams are back after a long break: http://pastebin.com/mb1876f6 Like the others they are fairly easily blocked but just thought I'd pass on what I'd seen. Chris - Chris Owen - Garden City (620) 275-1900 - Lottery (noun): President - Wichita (316) 858-3000 -A stupidity tax Hubris Communications Inc www.hubris.net -
Re: New image spams
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 11:38:19 -0500 Chris Owen ow...@hubris.net wrote: I'm sure I'm not the first to see them but I hadn't seen a post here. The pharma image spams are back after a long break: http://pastebin.com/mb1876f6 Like the others they are fairly easily blocked but just thought I'd pass on what I'd seen. Unlike the last batch, this scored nothing on FuzzyOCR.
