Re: R: Custom rule based on AWL score

2016-10-21 Thread Karol Augustin 

On 20/10/16 17:44, Nicola Piazzi wrote:

Why not try my powerful plugin to reduce score of known users ?
Is based on people that answer to us and in my case, after 3 week of learning, 
it HIT 70% of incoming messages that are absolutely ham

Looks really interesting. How it behaves in ipv6 environment? Given that 
it tries to extract C class from IP address. Will it just silently skip 
the check or crash miserably?



k.

Re: R: Custom rule based on AWL score

2016-10-20 Thread Axb 

On 10/20/2016 06:44 PM, Nicola Piazzi wrote:

Why not try my powerful plugin to reduce score of known users ? Is
based on people that answer to us and in my case, after 3 week of
learning, it HIT 70% of incoming messages that are absolutely ham


http://saplugin.16mb.com/


If you mean your OW plugin

The fact that "It can be used ONLY when the spamassassin installation is 
in the same smarthost that deliver both incoming and outgoing emails."


rules out its usage in many larger setups.

Pity...

Axv

R: Custom rule based on AWL score

2016-10-20 Thread Nicola Piazzi 
Why not try my powerful plugin to reduce score of known users ?
Is based on people that answer to us and in my case, after 3 week of learning, 
it HIT 70% of incoming messages that are absolutely ham


http://saplugin.16mb.com/


Nicola Piazzi
CED - Sistemi
COMET s.p.a.
Via Michelino, 105 - 40127 Bologna - Italia
Tel.  +39 051.6079.293
Cell. +39 328.21.73.470
Web: www.gruppocomet.it


-Messaggio originale-
Da: John Hardin [mailto:jhar...@impsec.org] 
Inviato: giovedì 20 ottobre 2016 18:36
A: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Oggetto: Re: Custom rule based on AWL score

On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Ian Zimmerman wrote:

> On 2016-10-20 08:34, simplerezo wrote:
>
>> My understanding is that AWL is helping frequent senders who are 
>> known to not send spam to "reduce" their spam score, preventing false 
>> positive. That's exactly what I want to rely on for my rules: adding 
>> score for mail with "invoice" pretention and an attachment but only 
>> for very unknown users (or spammers).
>
> Just add your custom rules globally, with reasonable scores.
>
> Whitelisted senders get a _huge_ bonus (I think it's 100 points by 
> default, maybe customizable), so they won't be affected if you do it 
> right.

ITYM  -100 points. :)

Small but important detail... :)

-- 
  John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
  jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
  key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
---
   No representation without taxation!
---
  303 days since the first successful real return to launch site (SpaceX)