Re: RDJ 404's
RulesDuJour is obsolete, you should use sa-update instead. On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:59:12 +1000 Leigh Sharpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm downloading once a day from only one PC. Regards, Leigh Leigh Sharpe Network Systems Engineer Pacific Wireless Ph +61 3 9584 8966 Mob 0408 009 502 Helpdesk 1300 300 616 email [EMAIL PROTECTED] web www.pacificwireless.com.au -Original Message- From: Jan Doberstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 26 July 2007 4:09 PM To: Leigh Sharpe Cc: users Subject: Re: RDJ 404's hi Leigh, Leigh Sharpe schrieb: I'm getting 404 errors on my RulesDuJour, for whatever rule I have listed first in the config. If I remove the offending rule from the config, I get a 404 on whatever rule is next in the list. All other rules are OK. Can anybody offer any explanation of why? Just an Idea Download Policy: You can download each and every ruleset once per 24 hour period per IP address. If you try to download the rulesets too often, you will receive an error message. If you are downloading rulesets from many locations behind a proxy, please set up your own ruleset repository for your clients. Again: One single download of every file per 24 hours per IP address. \jd -- Adam Wilbraham - Assistant Systems Administrator TechnoPhobia Limited The Workstation 15 Paternoster Row SHEFFIELD England S1 2BX t: +44 (0)114 2212123 f: +44 (0)114 2212124 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] w: http://www.technophobia.com/ Registered in England and Wales Company No. 3063669 VAT registration No. 598 7858 42 ISO 9001:2000 Accredited Company No. 21227 ISO 14001:2004 Accredited Company No. E997 ISO 27001:2005 (BS7799) Accredited Company No. IS 508906 Investor in People Certified No. 101507 The contents of this email are confidential to the addressee and are intended solely for the recipients use. If you are not the addressee, you have received this email in error. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the author personally and not TechnoPhobia Limited who do not accept responsibility for the contents of the message. All email communications, in and out of TechnoPhobia, are recorded for monitoring purposes.
Re: RDJ 404's
Thats been the general jist of whats been said on here for a while now. We've switched all our servers to sa-update, I don't really see the need to use RDJ any more when theres a proper update tool included with SpamAssassin these days... On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:14:40 -0700 Kevin W. Gagel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Original Message - From: Adam Wilbraham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: RDJ 404's Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:02:21 +0100 RulesDuJour is obsolete, you should use sa-update instead. Really? Why doesn't it say that on the TWiki or the rulesemporium website or the SpamAssassin documentation? I am also having this same problem... = Kevin W. Gagel Network Administrator Information Technology Services (250) 562-2131 local 448 My Blog: http://mail.cnc.bc.ca/blogs/gagel --- The College of New Caledonia, Visit us at http://www.cnc.bc.ca Virus scanning is done on all incoming and outgoing email. Anti-spam information for CNC can be found at http://avas.cnc.bc.ca --- -- Adam Wilbraham - Assistant Systems Administrator TechnoPhobia Limited The Workstation 15 Paternoster Row SHEFFIELD England S1 2BX t: +44 (0)114 2212123 f: +44 (0)114 2212124 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] w: http://www.technophobia.com/ Registered in England and Wales Company No. 3063669 VAT registration No. 598 7858 42 ISO 9001:2000 Accredited Company No. 21227 ISO 14001:2004 Accredited Company No. E997 ISO 27001:2005 (BS7799) Accredited Company No. IS 508906 Investor in People Certified No. 101507 The contents of this email are confidential to the addressee and are intended solely for the recipients use. If you are not the addressee, you have received this email in error. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the author personally and not TechnoPhobia Limited who do not accept responsibility for the contents of the message. All email communications, in and out of TechnoPhobia, are recorded for monitoring purposes.
Re: RDJ 404's
The author of RDJ has indicated on lists that they are no longer maintain the script and recommend switching to sa-update. Martin.Hepworth wrote: Maybe obsolete for sare rules (due to ddos issues etc), but its very handy for other peoples rulesets you want to keep up-to date.. -- Martin Hepworth Snr Systems Administrator Solid State Logic Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 26 July 2007 16:15 To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: RDJ 404's - Original Message - From: Adam Wilbraham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: RDJ 404's Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:02:21 +0100 RulesDuJour is obsolete, you should use sa-update instead. Really? Why doesn't it say that on the TWiki or the rulesemporium website or the SpamAssassin documentation? I am also having this same problem...
RE: RDJ 404's
Ahhh. Is sa-update compatible with SpamAssassin 3.0.3? Some of us are still using that version for what we feel is a good reason (still using Debian Sarge on servers). I only recently moved to 3.1.9 so I could implement sa-update. I know I was on a version later than 3.0.3 and was unable to get sa-update to work. It didn't have the --import option for the gpgkey and also the channels were unavailable (I believe I was on 3.1.0).
Re: RDJ 404's
Raquel wrote: On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:02:21 +0100 Adam Wilbraham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: RulesDuJour is obsolete, you should use sa-update instead. Ahhh. Is sa-update compatible with SpamAssassin 3.0.3? Some of us are still using that version for what we feel is a good reason (still using Debian Sarge on servers). No, it requires 3.1.1 as a minimum, I think. Just remember that the effectiveness of a SA release drops over time.
Fwd: ***SPAM 15.7*** NDN: Re: RDJ 404's
Here is that silly auto-reply again. I'll paste the headers for the list moderator to view and perhaps ban the address from the list. ---Paste--- Received: from avas.cnc.bc.ca (avas.cnc.bc.ca [142.27.70.214]) by mail.cnc.bc.ca (CNC's internal mail server) with ESMTP id 94847-1875351 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:27:54 -0700 Return-Path: Received: by avas.cnc.bc.ca (Postfix, from userid 501) id 157E8145E0D0; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:31:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Tests: _TESTSCORES(,)_ X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1 (2007-05-02) on avas.cnc.bc.ca X-Spam-See: http://avas.cnc.bc.ca for information about anti-spam scanning. X-Spam-Scored: 15.7 out of a required 5.0 X-Spam-Summary: 2.7 FH_FROMEML_NOTLD E-mail address doesn't have TLD (.com, etc.) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 4.0 BAYES_95 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 95 to 99% [score: 0.9712] 5.0 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/) 5.0 DCC_CHECK Listed in DCC (http://rhyolite.com/anti-spam/dcc/) -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [193.235.87.101 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 DIGEST_MULTIPLE Message hits more than one network digest check X-Spam-Autolearn: Autolearned as no X-Spam-Scan-Date: Scanned on Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:31:45 -0700 X-Spam-DCCD-Results: CollegeOfNewCaledonia, avas.cnc.bc.ca 1189; Body=1 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=many X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-RBL-Results: dns:101.87.235.193.list.dnswl.org [127.0.8.1] Received: from smtpguard.norrkoping.se (smtpguard.norrkoping.se [193.235.87.101]) by avas.cnc.bc.ca (Postfix) with SMTP id CB920145DFE2 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:31:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: From http://www.fc.norrkoping.se ([194.68.142.18]) by smtpguard.norrkoping.se (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR2WSP0806WSP0806); id 1177608588581; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:29:48 +0200 Message-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 19:29:00 +0200 Subject: ***SPAM 15.7*** NDN: Re: RDJ 404's X-Mailer: FirstClass 8.3 (build 8.283) X-FC-Icon-ID: 2031 X-FC-SERVER-TZ: 181272840 X-FC-MachineGenerated: true To: Kevin W. Gagel [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=--=_--03bec287.03bec286.c2ce8a5c X-Spam-Prev-Subject: NDN: Re: RDJ 404's X-Rcpt-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-NotAscii: charset=iso X-IP-stats: Catcher Isspam Notspam Incoming Outgoing Last 0, First 342, in=921240, out=308160, spam=386 Known=true ip=142.27.70.214 X-Originating-IP: 142.27.70.214 Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to: Fredrik Andersson (Mailbox or Conference is full.) = Kevin W. Gagel Network Administrator Information Technology Services (250) 562-2131 local 448 My Blog: http://mail.cnc.bc.ca/blogs/gagel --- The College of New Caledonia, Visit us at http://www.cnc.bc.ca Virus scanning is done on all incoming and outgoing email. Anti-spam information for CNC can be found at http://avas.cnc.bc.ca ---
Re: RDJ 404's
Sorry yes thats true, although I think in this instance its the SARE rules they're having problems getting. On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:20:30 +0100 Martin.Hepworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe obsolete for sare rules (due to ddos issues etc), but its very handy for other peoples rulesets you want to keep up-to date.. -- Martin Hepworth Snr Systems Administrator Solid State Logic Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 26 July 2007 16:15 To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: RDJ 404's - Original Message - From: Adam Wilbraham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: RDJ 404's Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:02:21 +0100 RulesDuJour is obsolete, you should use sa-update instead. Really? Why doesn't it say that on the TWiki or the rulesemporium website or the SpamAssassin documentation? I am also having this same problem... = Kevin W. Gagel Network Administrator Information Technology Services (250) 562-2131 local 448 My Blog: http://mail.cnc.bc.ca/blogs/gagel --- The College of New Caledonia, Visit us at http://www.cnc.bc.ca Virus scanning is done on all incoming and outgoing email. Anti-spam information for CNC can be found at http://avas.cnc.bc.ca --- ** Confidentiality : This e-mail and any attachments are intended for the addressee only and may be confidential. If they come to you in error you must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone. Please advise the sender by replying to this e-mail immediately and then delete the original from your computer. Opinion : Any opinions expressed in this e-mail are entirely those of the author and unless specifically stated to the contrary, are not necessarily those of the author's employer. Security Warning : Internet e-mail is not necessarily a secure communications medium and can be subject to data corruption. We advise that you consider this fact when e-mailing us. Viruses : We have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and any attachments are free from known viruses but in keeping with good computing practice, you should ensure that they are virus free. Red Lion 49 Ltd T/A Solid State Logic Registered as a limited company in England and Wales (Company No:5362730) Registered Office: 25 Spring Hill Road, Begbroke, Oxford OX5 1RU, United Kingdom ** -- Adam Wilbraham - Assistant Systems Administrator TechnoPhobia Limited The Workstation 15 Paternoster Row SHEFFIELD England S1 2BX t: +44 (0)114 2212123 f: +44 (0)114 2212124 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] w: http://www.technophobia.com/ Registered in England and Wales Company No. 3063669 VAT registration No. 598 7858 42 ISO 9001:2000 Accredited Company No. 21227 ISO 14001:2004 Accredited Company No. E997 ISO 27001:2005 (BS7799) Accredited Company No. IS 508906 Investor in People Certified No. 101507 The contents of this email are confidential to the addressee and are intended solely for the recipients use. If you are not the addressee, you have received this email in error. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the author personally and not TechnoPhobia Limited who do not accept responsibility for the contents of the message. All email communications, in and out of TechnoPhobia, are recorded for monitoring purposes.
Re: RDJ 404's
- Original Message - From: Adam Wilbraham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: RDJ 404's Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:02:21 +0100 RulesDuJour is obsolete, you should use sa-update instead. Really? Why doesn't it say that on the TWiki or the rulesemporium website or the SpamAssassin documentation? I am also having this same problem... = Kevin W. Gagel Network Administrator Information Technology Services (250) 562-2131 local 448 My Blog: http://mail.cnc.bc.ca/blogs/gagel --- The College of New Caledonia, Visit us at http://www.cnc.bc.ca Virus scanning is done on all incoming and outgoing email. Anti-spam information for CNC can be found at http://avas.cnc.bc.ca ---
Re: RDJ 404's
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:02:21 +0100 Adam Wilbraham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: RulesDuJour is obsolete, you should use sa-update instead. Ahhh. Is sa-update compatible with SpamAssassin 3.0.3? Some of us are still using that version for what we feel is a good reason (still using Debian Sarge on servers). -- Raquel Censorship, like charity, should begin at home; but, unlike charity, it should end there. --Clare Booth Luce
Re: RDJ 404's
- Original Message - From: Richard Frovarp [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: RDJ 404's Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:25:46 -0500 The author of RDJ has indicated on lists that they are no longer maintain the script and recommend switching to sa-update. Your assuming that everyone has time to read every message that comes through ever list they have to monitor. None the less... I seem to have been suffering from a bit of hoof'n mouth disease today... The Wiki does in-fact mention that users should be switching over to sa-update. I didn't see that till today... The rules_du_jour site should also be updated to reflect that. I didn't see anything there about except that you could use sa-update and a how to. = Kevin W. Gagel Network Administrator Information Technology Services (250) 562-2131 local 448 My Blog: http://mail.cnc.bc.ca/blogs/gagel --- The College of New Caledonia, Visit us at http://www.cnc.bc.ca Virus scanning is done on all incoming and outgoing email. Anti-spam information for CNC can be found at http://avas.cnc.bc.ca ---
Re: RDJ 404's
hi Leigh, Leigh Sharpe schrieb: I'm getting 404 errors on my RulesDuJour, for whatever rule I have listed first in the config. If I remove the offending rule from the config, I get a 404 on whatever rule is next in the list. All other rules are OK. Can anybody offer any explanation of why? Just an Idea Download Policy: You can download each and every ruleset once per 24 hour period per IP address. If you try to download the rulesets too often, you will receive an error message. If you are downloading rulesets from many locations behind a proxy, please set up your own ruleset repository for your clients. Again: One single download of every file per 24 hours per IP address. \jd
RE: RDJ 404's
I'm downloading once a day from only one PC. Regards, Leigh Leigh Sharpe Network Systems Engineer Pacific Wireless Ph +61 3 9584 8966 Mob 0408 009 502 Helpdesk 1300 300 616 email [EMAIL PROTECTED] web www.pacificwireless.com.au -Original Message- From: Jan Doberstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 26 July 2007 4:09 PM To: Leigh Sharpe Cc: users Subject: Re: RDJ 404's hi Leigh, Leigh Sharpe schrieb: I'm getting 404 errors on my RulesDuJour, for whatever rule I have listed first in the config. If I remove the offending rule from the config, I get a 404 on whatever rule is next in the list. All other rules are OK. Can anybody offer any explanation of why? Just an Idea Download Policy: You can download each and every ruleset once per 24 hour period per IP address. If you try to download the rulesets too often, you will receive an error message. If you are downloading rulesets from many locations behind a proxy, please set up your own ruleset repository for your clients. Again: One single download of every file per 24 hours per IP address. \jd
RDJ 404's
Hi all, I'm getting 404 errors on my RulesDuJour, for whatever rule I have listed first in the config. If I remove the offending rule from the config, I get a 404 on whatever rule is next in the list. All other rules are OK. Can anybody offer any explanation of why? Regards, Leigh Leigh Sharpe Network Systems Engineer Pacific Wireless Ph +61 3 9584 8966 Mob 0408 009 502 Helpdesk 1300 300 616 email [EMAIL PROTECTED] web www.pacificwireless.com.au
