Re: The rules has more weigh than bayesian-learn ?
Your question doesn't really make sense. The results of the Bayes examination are rules based on the 0-100 spam probability. If I understand what you're asking though, the Bayes system results in 1 rule hit, whereas there are hundreds of other rules that can all hit, so generally rules would outweigh Bayes, unless you change the weighting (score) of the Bayes rule in relation to the other rules. Thanks for helping. I didn´t understand until now. All make sense. I'm trying to use SpamAssassin in a structure as such: Postfix + Amavis + Clamav + SpamAssassin. Will I lose much considerably in the quality of my anti-spam if I not use the bayesian rule? Best Regards, -- []'s Thiago Henrique Network Administration Digirati Networks K8 Networks Hostnet Hosting
RE: The rules has more weigh than bayesian-learn ?
-Original Message- From: Thiago Henrique Rodrigues [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 11:11 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: The rules has more weigh than bayesian-learn ? Your question doesn't really make sense. The results of the Bayes examination are rules based on the 0-100 spam probability. If I understand what you're asking though, the Bayes system results in 1 rule hit, whereas there are hundreds of other rules that can all hit, so generally rules would outweigh Bayes, unless you change the weighting (score) of the Bayes rule in relation to the other rules. Thanks for helping. I didn´t understand until now. All make sense. I'm trying to use SpamAssassin in a structure as such: Postfix + Amavis + Clamav + SpamAssassin. Will I lose much considerably in the quality of my anti-spam if I not use the bayesian rule? Bayes is a good piece of code, which fits fine in SA. Thereby I would suggest not to avoid using it. Nevertheless, if you still prefer not to rely on it, you may lower a bit the spam tag and kill levels in Amavis such that pattern rules and network tests may suffice. I find bayes quite useful also in avoiding FPs, not only in detecting spam... Giampaolo Best Regards, -- []'s Thiago Henrique Network Administration Digirati Networks K8 Networks Hostnet Hosting
Re: The rules has more weigh than bayesian-learn ?
Thiago Henrique Rodrigues wrote: Dear, I am a novice in the use of SpamAssassin and I need your help. Who has more weigh in the classification of a message, the rules or the bayesian-learn ? Best Regards, -- []'s Thiago Henrique Network Administration Digirati Networks K8 Networks Hostnet Hosting It depends on the scores you give each thing. I.E bayesian confidence 90-100% you might give 6 points to and a single rule onlly 1 point. But if the bayesian confidence was only 5% you may give it 0 points. Kate
Re: The rules has more weigh than bayesian-learn ?
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 04:32:00PM -0300, Thiago Henrique Rodrigues wrote: I am a novice in the use of SpamAssassin and I need your help. Who has more weigh in the classification of a message, the rules or the bayesian-learn ? Your question doesn't really make sense. The results of the Bayes examination are rules based on the 0-100 spam probability. If I understand what you're asking though, the Bayes system results in 1 rule hit, whereas there are hundreds of other rules that can all hit, so generally rules would outweigh Bayes, unless you change the weighting (score) of the Bayes rule in relation to the other rules. -- Randomly Selected Tagline: I am NOT a computer geek! ... I just spend too much time in front of the computer. - Theo pgpBerDu77NYx.pgp Description: PGP signature
