Re: New dictionary spamming method -- SOLVED!

2005-05-31 Thread Kelson

Kevin Peuhkurinen wrote:
Looks like some particularly inept spammer is grabbing partial 
Message-IDs from the headers of messages on this list and trying to send 
email to them as though they were email addresses.   Sad, really.


We occasionally get mail sent to *full* message-IDs.  A nice 
demonstration of the fact that (at least some) spammers really don't pay 
any attention to what's on their lists.


--
Kelson Vibber
SpeedGate Communications 


Re: New dictionary spamming method -- SOLVED!

2005-05-30 Thread Kevin Peuhkurinen
Looks like some particularly inept spammer is grabbing partial 
Message-IDs from the headers of messages on this list and trying to send 
email to them as though they were email addresses.   Sad, really.



Kevin Peuhkurinen wrote:

I've noticed recently in my MTA logs a growing trend of attempts to 
send email to numbered email addresses, such as:


[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Anyone have any ideas why spammers would be trying this particular 
tactic?







Re: New dictionary spamming method?

2005-05-30 Thread Rick van Vliet

Steven Stern said the following on 5/30/2005 12:11 PM:

Kevin Peuhkurinen wrote:


Steven Stern wrote:


I got a similar bunch of messages (approx 250) between 6:05 and 6:15
CDT, from about 10 unique IP addresses, yesterday and today, but on only
one of my 3 MX servers.

Interesting.  For me, they started May 28th at almost exactly noon 
EDT.I'm almost tempted to let a couple through to verify if it is 
spam or a virus.




They get stopped on my system by milter-greylist.  I'm interested in 
your results if you let a few through.  Given the short duration bursts, 
it seems more like a probe than a flat out, widespread attack.  Maybe 
yet another followup from Sober.



Got a handful, too - definitely not an all-out attack, but the ones I 
salvaged do simply look like the ever-popular male-enhancement pills in 
multi-part. I use safecat to pop spam in the user's .Spam folder, but 
these were stopped due to no-valid-addressand then doubleBounced.

 SA 3.0.3 gave them a "-0.2" score. :\
Anyone want a copy?



Re: New dictionary spamming method?

2005-05-30 Thread Steven Stern

Kevin Peuhkurinen wrote:

Steven Stern wrote:


I got a similar bunch of messages (approx 250) between 6:05 and 6:15
CDT, from about 10 unique IP addresses, yesterday and today, but on only
one of my 3 MX servers.

Interesting.  For me, they started May 28th at almost exactly noon 
EDT.I'm almost tempted to let a couple through to verify if it is 
spam or a virus.




They get stopped on my system by milter-greylist.  I'm interested in 
your results if you let a few through.  Given the short duration bursts, 
it seems more like a probe than a flat out, widespread attack.  Maybe 
yet another followup from Sober.



--

   Steve


Re: New dictionary spamming method?

2005-05-30 Thread Kevin Peuhkurinen

Steven Stern wrote:


I got a similar bunch of messages (approx 250) between 6:05 and 6:15
CDT, from about 10 unique IP addresses, yesterday and today, but on only
one of my 3 MX servers.

Interesting.  For me, they started May 28th at almost exactly noon 
EDT.I'm almost tempted to let a couple through to verify if it is 
spam or a virus.




Re: New dictionary spamming method?

2005-05-30 Thread Steven Stern

Kevin Peuhkurinen wrote:
I've noticed recently in my MTA logs a growing trend of attempts to send 
email to numbered email addresses, such as:


[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Anyone have any ideas why spammers would be trying this particular tactic?



I got a similar bunch of messages (approx 250) between 6:05 and 6:15
CDT, from about 10 unique IP addresses, yesterday and today, but on only
one of my 3 MX servers.

--

   Steve