Re: Re: Re: Re: Upgrade... + other (perl?) problems

2005-03-16 Thread sa-users
Am 16.03.2005 um 08:55 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben:
> Am 16.03.2005 um 00:31 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben:
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 12:27:28AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > Are there problems with mail header identification?
> > > Am I in the wrong list with this question?
> > > > Mar 13 01:16:18 ns spamd[28893]: processing message
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for web321p1:104.
> > > > Mar 13 01:16:20 ns spamd[28893]: Use of uninitialized value in
> > > > concatenation (.) or string at
> > > >
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/NoMailAudit.pm
> line
> > > > 184.
> >
> > I'm guessing you upgraded to 3.x but are using the 2.x
> spamassassin/spamd.
> > NoMailAudit doesn't exist in 3.x.
> >
>
> /var/log/mail tells me
> spamd[960]: server started on port 783/tcp (running version 3.0.2)
>
> :~# spamc  -V
> SpamAssassin Client version 3.0.2
>
> I did my upgrade via CPAN. What did go wrong?
>

Are old modules the reason my spam does not get marked as spam ?

Lars Dierich




Re: Re: Re: Upgrade... + other (perl?) problems

2005-03-16 Thread sa-users
Am 16.03.2005 um 00:31 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 12:27:28AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > Are there problems with mail header identification?
> > Am I in the wrong list with this question?
> > > Mar 13 01:16:18 ns spamd[28893]: processing message
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for web321p1:104.
> > > Mar 13 01:16:20 ns spamd[28893]: Use of uninitialized value in
> > > concatenation (.) or string at
> > > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/NoMailAudit.pm
line
> > > 184.
>
> I'm guessing you upgraded to 3.x but are using the 2.x
spamassassin/spamd.
> NoMailAudit doesn't exist in 3.x.
>

/var/log/mail tells me
spamd[960]: server started on port 783/tcp (running version 3.0.2)

:~# spamc  -V
SpamAssassin Client version 3.0.2

I did my upgrade via CPAN. What did go wrong?