RE: SUBJ_ALL_CAPS
Quite clearly they're capitol spaces! ;-) ...Kevin -- Kevin Miller Network/email Administrator, CBJ MIS Dept. 155 South Seward Street Juneau, Alaska 99801 Phone: (907) 586-0242, Fax: (907) 586-4500 Registered Linux User No: 307357 -Original Message- From: Niamh Holding [mailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 12:15 AM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Hello Adam, Wednesday, April 22, 2015, 8:47:48 AM, you wrote: AM Prefix: Re:, Fwd: etc. are striped before test. Quite right too, mind the next complain will be that it isn't all caps because of the spaces... -- Best regards, Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
RE: SUBJ_ALL_CAPS
That sounds like a capital idea!
But, but, but, when did those spaces become a building?
(runs for cover... ;)
On Wed, 22 Apr 2015, Kevin Miller wrote:
Quite clearly they're capitol spaces! ;-)
...Kevin
--
Kevin Miller
Network/email Administrator, CBJ MIS Dept.
155 South Seward Street
Juneau, Alaska 99801
Phone: (907) 586-0242, Fax: (907) 586-4500
Registered Linux User No: 307357
-Original Message-
From: Niamh Holding [mailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 12:15 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: SUBJ_ALL_CAPS
Hello Adam,
Wednesday, April 22, 2015, 8:47:48 AM, you wrote:
AM Prefix: Re:, Fwd: etc. are striped before test.
Quite right too, mind the next complain will be that it isn't all caps
because of the spaces...
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
--
Dave Funk University of Iowa
dbfunk (at) engineering.uiowa.eduCollege of Engineering
319/335-5751 FAX: 319/384-0549 1256 Seamans Center
Sys_admin/Postmaster/cell_adminIowa City, IA 52242-1527
#include std_disclaimer.h
Better is not better, 'standard' is better. B{
Re: SUBJ_ALL_CAPS
Hello uhm why - there is at least one lowercase char Subject: Re: HOTEL RESERVATION. * 1.5 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/Rules/SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Prefix: Re:, Fwd: etc. are striped before test. Look in /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/HeaderEval.pm Best Regards
Re: SUBJ_ALL_CAPS
Hello Adam, Wednesday, April 22, 2015, 8:47:48 AM, you wrote: AM Prefix: Re:, Fwd: etc. are striped before test. Quite right too, mind the next complain will be that it isn't all caps because of the spaces... -- Best regards, Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk pgp_3L5zupRaj.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: SUBJ_ALL_CAPS
Am 22.04.2015 um 10:14 schrieb Niamh Holding: Hello Adam, Wednesday, April 22, 2015, 8:47:48 AM, you wrote: AM Prefix: Re:, Fwd: etc. are striped before test. Quite right too, mind the next complain will be that it isn't all caps because of the spaces... don't confuse questions with complaints the only real complain for that rule is that numbers are ignored in case of the subject is a serial number of a device or something similar signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: SUBJ_ALL_CAPS
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:37:08 -0400 Joe Sniderman wrote: On 08/20/2013 12:35 PM, Andrew Talbot wrote: Hey all - Does anybody know how long the string needs to be to trigger SUBJ_ALL_CAPS? I know it has to be multi-word and over a certain length. Was wondering the specific length. Thanks in advance J IDK, but on an interesting side note, it appears your message did not trigger the rule... maybe a string of multiple words separated by underscores is not considered multiword... An underscore is considered to be a word character so that's not surprising. But the test is actually for a whitespace character in the subject, a trailing space would do.
Re: SUBJ_ALL_CAPS
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 12:35:27 -0400 Andrew Talbot wrote: Hey all - Does anybody know how long the string needs to be to trigger SUBJ_ALL_CAPS? I know it has to be multi-word and over a certain length. Was wondering the specific length. 10
Re: SUBJ_ALL_CAPS
On 08/20/2013 12:35 PM, Andrew Talbot wrote: Hey all - Does anybody know how long the string needs to be to trigger SUBJ_ALL_CAPS? I know it has to be multi-word and over a certain length. Was wondering the specific length. Thanks in advance J IDK, but on an interesting side note, it appears your message did not trigger the rule... Subject: SUBJ_ALL_CAPS X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS Maybe a string of multiple words separated by underscores is not considered multiword... -- Joe Sniderman joseph.snider...@thoroquel.org
Re: SUBJ_ALL_CAPS vs. RE:
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 09:25 +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
SUBJ_ALL_CAPS to you, but not to me:
Subject: RE: 柯小柯
Can't you give the RE: etc. a break?
And also why is the Chinese considered CAPS?
Err, dude. Just venting here, I guess, because you got bit by this?
Bug 5859 [1]. In particular, have a close look at your own me too
comment 1.
What is the point of this post? You do know it's a bug, you do know it
is on record. That's where this issue should be handled. Constructive
comments and patches welcome. Venting and whining on the users list will
not get you anywhere.
guenther
[1] https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5859
--
char *t=\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4;
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;il;i++){ i%8? c=1:
(c=*++x); c128 (s+=h); if (!(h=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
Re: SUBJ_ALL_CAPS anti-Asian (KS - SWC Ê)
On lördagen den 18 april 2009, Benny Pedersen wrote: On Sat, April 18, 2009 11:58, mouss wrote: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5859 please attach full headers to this ticket (feel free to obfuscate private infos). subject seems imho bad in the way that it must be utf-8 encoded in the whole subject not just partly, i might of course be wroung changed subject here to see if squirrelmail make bugs :) I'm not sure what you mean, but there can be any number of encoded-words in a field, using different encodings and character sets, and mixed with ordinary 7-bit text. See RFC 2047. -- Magnus Holmgrenholmg...@lysator.liu.se (No Cc of list mail needed, thanks) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: SUBJ_ALL_CAPS anti-Asian
jida...@jidanni.org a écrit : How unfair: this triggered SUBJ_ALL_CAPS: Subject: RE: 請教無線電掃瞄 A little capital E and it gets slammed with SUBJ_ALL_CAPS, no matter how much Chinese follows. (source: Subject: =?utf-8?B?UkU6IOiri+aVmeeEoee3mumbu+aOg+eehA==?=) https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5859 please attach full headers to this ticket (feel free to obfuscate private infos).
Re: SUBJ_ALL_CAPS anti-Asian (KS - SWC Ê)
On Sat, April 18, 2009 11:58, mouss wrote: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5859 please attach full headers to this ticket (feel free to obfuscate private infos). subject seems imho bad in the way that it must be utf-8 encoded in the whole subject not just partly, i might of course be wroung changed subject here to see if squirrelmail make bugs :) -- http://localhost/ 100% uptime and 100% mirrored :)
