Re: mail with faked hyperlink

2010-06-15 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello Daniel Lemke,

Am 2010-06-15 09:08:41, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
 The following mail passed SA this morning:
 
 http://pastebin.com/AgzqppqA
 
 It contains several links that do not match their real target url so
 it's apparently trying to fool its reader.
 Are there any rules or plugins that are able to catch mails like these?

On my standard Debian installation I get 6.8 Points...

Note:   I do not use hostkarma because it has never worked for me.

Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack

-- 
# Debian GNU/Linux Consultant ##
   Development of Intranet and Embedded Systems with Debian GNU/Linux

itsyst...@tdnet France EURL   itsyst...@tdnet UG (limited liability)
Owner Michelle KonzackOwner Michelle Konzack

Apt. 917 (homeoffice)
50, rue de Soultz Kinzigstraße 17
67100 Strasbourg/France   77694 Kehl/Germany
Tel: +33-6-61925193 mobil Tel: +49-177-9351947 mobil
Tel: +33-9-52705884 fix

http://www.itsystems.tamay-dogan.net/  http://www.flexray4linux.org/
http://www.debian.tamay-dogan.net/ http://www.can4linux.org/

Jabber linux4miche...@jabber.ccc.de
ICQ#328449886

Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/


signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature


Re: mail with faked hyperlink

2010-06-15 Thread Daniel Lemke


Michelle Konzack-2 wrote:
 
 On my standard Debian installation I get 6.8 Points...
 
Hm got 1.8 from URIBL_BLACK and 1.8 from MISSING_MIMEOLE.
But as stated, there should be a rule identifying the mismatch between shown
url and real url target.




 Note:   I do not use hostkarma because it has never worked for me.
 

I did some rescoring, having a close look on it for the next couple of days.

Daniel
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/mail-with-faked-hyperlink-tp2901p28889905.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



Re: mail with faked hyperlink

2010-06-15 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello Daniel Lemke,

Am 2010-06-15 04:02:11, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
 Hm got 1.8 from URIBL_BLACK and 1.8 from MISSING_MIMEOLE.
 But as stated, there should be a rule identifying the mismatch between shown
 url and real url target.

This would even hit legal newsletter from e.g. Analog Devices or such.

The problem is, that there are many enterprises  which  use  Third-Party
Bulk-Mailer for there newsletters and in the same time the  do  analysis
useing the faked links.

If I would uses such rule, I would not more get messages from more  then
20 enterprises...

I offer such Bulk-Mailservice, but I use a VHost of the customers domain
to avoid problmes with spamfilters...

Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack

-- 
# Debian GNU/Linux Consultant ##
   Development of Intranet and Embedded Systems with Debian GNU/Linux

itsyst...@tdnet France EURL   itsyst...@tdnet UG (limited liability)
Owner Michelle KonzackOwner Michelle Konzack

Apt. 917 (homeoffice)
50, rue de Soultz Kinzigstraße 17
67100 Strasbourg/France   77694 Kehl/Germany
Tel: +33-6-61925193 mobil Tel: +49-177-9351947 mobil
Tel: +33-9-52705884 fix

http://www.itsystems.tamay-dogan.net/  http://www.flexray4linux.org/
http://www.debian.tamay-dogan.net/ http://www.can4linux.org/

Jabber linux4miche...@jabber.ccc.de
ICQ#328449886

Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/


signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature


Re: mail with faked hyperlink

2010-06-15 Thread Ned Slider

On 15/06/10 12:02, Daniel Lemke wrote:



Michelle Konzack-2 wrote:


On my standard Debian installation I get 6.8 Points...


Hm got 1.8 from URIBL_BLACK and 1.8 from MISSING_MIMEOLE.
But as stated, there should be a rule identifying the mismatch between shown
url and real url target.



...which would probably hit just as much ham as spam - it's not uncommon 
for urls not to match the displayed test.