On 10/6/04 5:56 AM, "Darren Coleman" wrote: > I'm sorry to say but you must have some sort of configuration issue with > your install, and I'd suggest to RTFM. I upgraded from 2.64 to 3.00 and > have recently less untagged spam (as expected) as a result. > > - Are you using any additional rulesets from www.rulesemporium.com ? If > not why not? :) > - Have you verified that your configuration is correct and working? > (spamassassin --lint)
We too are seeing a small percentage (I mean small) of spam or what I would call spam getting past, seems the scores are lower, we are set at 5 and most of the questionable stuff is like 4.3 and such, also we seem to be getting time-outs which would account for the spam (Working on that issue), and are not running any additional rules at the moment as we wanted to see just how effective the new SA 3.0 is (Which I am impressed with). I would like to add more rules, but not sure what to add that isn't already being handled by SA? The www.rulesemporium.com does mention what SA has added though is still a little vague on what all has been integrated into SA and with the timeouts not really wanting to place more on SA until resolved. Have some of the rules been set with lower values with the new SA? I remember reading on the list that this may be the case to balance out all the other rules in place. Still very impressed with this latest release! Thanks! -- David Thurman The Web Presence Group http://www.the-presence.com Web Development/E-Commerce/CMS/Hosting/Dedicated Servers 800-399-6441/309-679-0774
