Re: SA 3.0 - USER_IN_BLACKLIST false positive?

2004-10-11 Thread jdow
From: Kai Schaetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Mike Zanker wrote on Sun, 10 Oct 2004 17:52:36 +0100:

  Yes, I am using that, but I thought USER_IN_BLACKLIST related to
  personal blacklists, not SURBL stuff.
 

 It does not relate to SURBL. It relates to rules, no matter in which *.cf
 file they are in /etc/mail/spamassassin. The rulename is relevant, not the
 filename.

I think he mixed up SURBL and SARE. The latter produces the best sets
of addon rules. The former is just a black list.

{^_^}




Re: SA 3.0 - USER_IN_BLACKLIST false positive?

2004-10-10 Thread Mike Zanker
On 09 October 2004 18:40 -0400 Theo Van Dinter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

Got me, you have to go hunting around and find out.  I have no way to
tell you what's on your box, but I can tell you the entries aren't
from SpamAssassin itself. ;)
I believe that it is a bug in SA 3.0. This is a fresh installation of 
SA, no blacklists have been created and the e-mail address was 
previously unknown.

Having searched back through the archives there are a couple of other 
reports of this 'phenomenon'.

Mike.


Re[2]: SA 3.0 - USER_IN_BLACKLIST false positive?

2004-10-10 Thread Marcos Saint'Anna
Hello Mike,

Almost  the  same  thing here... but it's the USER_IN_WHITELIST that's
making me nuts.

My  configuration files have no whitelist_from... but in the detection
description the USER_IN_WHITELIST is always there...


Best regards
-- 
 Marcos Saint'Anna
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You wrote:

MZ On 09 October 2004 18:40 -0400 Theo Van Dinter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MZ wrote:

 Got me, you have to go hunting around and find out.  I have no way to
 tell you what's on your box, but I can tell you the entries aren't
 from SpamAssassin itself. ;)

MZ I believe that it is a bug in SA 3.0. This is a fresh installation of
MZ SA, no blacklists have been created and the e-mail address was 
MZ previously unknown.

MZ Having searched back through the archives there are a couple of other
MZ reports of this 'phenomenon'.

MZ Mike.



Re: SA 3.0 - USER_IN_BLACKLIST false positive?

2004-10-10 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Mike Zanker wrote on Sun, 10 Oct 2004 17:52:36 +0100:

 Yes, I am using that, but I thought USER_IN_BLACKLIST related to 
 personal blacklists, not SURBL stuff.


It does not relate to SURBL. It relates to rules, no matter in which *.cf 
file they are in /etc/mail/spamassassin. The rulename is relevant, not the 
filename.


Kai

-- 

Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
IE-Center: http://ie5.de  http://msie.winware.org





SA 3.0 - USER_IN_BLACKLIST false positive?

2004-10-09 Thread Mike Zanker
Today I received a virus (Gibe-F) from an unknown e-mail address - it 
scored over 100 because of USER_IN_BLACKLIST. Now, I don't have any 
blacklists defined anywhere - in fact, SA is run only by MailScanner as 
user mail.

So, this seems to be a false positive. Anyone else seen it happening?
Thanks,
Mike.


Re: SA 3.0 - USER_IN_BLACKLIST false positive?

2004-10-09 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 09:09:12PM +0100, Mike Zanker wrote:
 scored over 100 because of USER_IN_BLACKLIST. Now, I don't have any 
 blacklists defined anywhere
 So, this seems to be a false positive. Anyone else seen it happening?

Well, yes you do. ;)  There are no default blacklist entries in SpamAssassin.

-- 
Randomly Generated Tagline:
I love drag queens, you can take 'em to dinner and then dancing, and if you
 get a flat on the way home, they can help you fix it.
 - Dave Attell, Insomniac Miami


pgpwY3zKvfVKq.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: SA 3.0 - USER_IN_BLACKLIST false positive?

2004-10-09 Thread Mike Zanker
On 09 October 2004 16:19 -0400 Theo Van Dinter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

Well, yes you do. ;)
I do what?
There are no default blacklist entries in SpamAssassin.
Exactly, so where did it come from?
Mike.


Re: SA 3.0 - USER_IN_BLACKLIST false positive?

2004-10-09 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 11:24:19PM +0100, Mike Zanker wrote:
 There are no default blacklist entries in SpamAssassin.
 Exactly, so where did it come from?

Got me, you have to go hunting around and find out.  I have no way to tell you
what's on your box, but I can tell you the entries aren't from SpamAssassin
itself. ;)

-- 
Randomly Generated Tagline:
That's weird.  It's like something out of that twilighty show about
 that zone.
 
-- Homer Simpson
   Treehouse of Horror VI


pgpbRCqZidXcK.pgp
Description: PGP signature