Re: Re: Upgrade... + other (perl?) problems [solved]

2005-03-17 Thread sa-users
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > Am 16.03.2005 um 08:55 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben:
> > > Am 16.03.2005 um 00:31 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 12:27:28AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > wrote:
> > > > > Are there problems with mail header identification?
> > > > > Am I in the wrong list with this question?
> > > > > > Mar 13 01:16:18 ns spamd[28893]: processing message
> > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for web321p1:104.
> > > > > > Mar 13 01:16:20 ns spamd[28893]: Use of uninitialized value
in
> > > > > > concatenation (.) or string at
> > > > > >
> > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/NoMailAudit.pm
> > > line
> > > > > > 184.
> > > >
> > > > I'm guessing you upgraded to 3.x but are using the 2.x
> > > spamassassin/spamd.
> > > > NoMailAudit doesn't exist in 3.x.
> > > >
> > >
> > > /var/log/mail tells me
> > > spamd[960]: server started on port 783/tcp (running version
3.0.2)
> > >
> > > :~# spamc  -V
> > > SpamAssassin Client version 3.0.2
> > >
> > > I did my upgrade via CPAN. What did go wrong?
> > >
> >
> > Are old modules the reason my spam does not get marked as spam ?
>
> I would say so -- I'm surprised anything is working if NoMailAudit
> is being used.

I did  a
~:$ cp /usr/bin/spamd  > /us/sbin/spamd

an now everything works fine :-)

Lars Dierich




Re: Upgrade... + other (perl?) problems

2005-03-16 Thread Justin Mason
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Am 16.03.2005 um 08:55 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben:
> > Am 16.03.2005 um 00:31 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben:
> > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 12:27:28AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > wrote:
> > > > Are there problems with mail header identification?
> > > > Am I in the wrong list with this question?
> > > > > Mar 13 01:16:18 ns spamd[28893]: processing message
> > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for web321p1:104.
> > > > > Mar 13 01:16:20 ns spamd[28893]: Use of uninitialized value in
> > > > > concatenation (.) or string at
> > > > >
> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/NoMailAudit.pm
> > line
> > > > > 184.
> > >
> > > I'm guessing you upgraded to 3.x but are using the 2.x
> > spamassassin/spamd.
> > > NoMailAudit doesn't exist in 3.x.
> > >
> >
> > /var/log/mail tells me
> > spamd[960]: server started on port 783/tcp (running version 3.0.2)
> >
> > :~# spamc  -V
> > SpamAssassin Client version 3.0.2
> >
> > I did my upgrade via CPAN. What did go wrong?
> >
> 
> Are old modules the reason my spam does not get marked as spam ?

I would say so -- I'm surprised anything is working if NoMailAudit
is being used.

- --j.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS

iD8DBQFCOIHeMJF5cimLx9ARAjCyAJ0VPUlAhiT0OY/aCfarRL0TRtkIdQCfeU7f
fat6LlqYi53mJDGbZztdgpo=
=T2CQ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: Re: Re: Re: Upgrade... + other (perl?) problems

2005-03-16 Thread sa-users
Am 16.03.2005 um 08:55 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben:
> Am 16.03.2005 um 00:31 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben:
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 12:27:28AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > Are there problems with mail header identification?
> > > Am I in the wrong list with this question?
> > > > Mar 13 01:16:18 ns spamd[28893]: processing message
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for web321p1:104.
> > > > Mar 13 01:16:20 ns spamd[28893]: Use of uninitialized value in
> > > > concatenation (.) or string at
> > > >
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/NoMailAudit.pm
> line
> > > > 184.
> >
> > I'm guessing you upgraded to 3.x but are using the 2.x
> spamassassin/spamd.
> > NoMailAudit doesn't exist in 3.x.
> >
>
> /var/log/mail tells me
> spamd[960]: server started on port 783/tcp (running version 3.0.2)
>
> :~# spamc  -V
> SpamAssassin Client version 3.0.2
>
> I did my upgrade via CPAN. What did go wrong?
>

Are old modules the reason my spam does not get marked as spam ?

Lars Dierich




Re: Re: Re: Upgrade... + other (perl?) problems

2005-03-16 Thread sa-users
Am 16.03.2005 um 00:31 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 12:27:28AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > Are there problems with mail header identification?
> > Am I in the wrong list with this question?
> > > Mar 13 01:16:18 ns spamd[28893]: processing message
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for web321p1:104.
> > > Mar 13 01:16:20 ns spamd[28893]: Use of uninitialized value in
> > > concatenation (.) or string at
> > > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/NoMailAudit.pm
line
> > > 184.
>
> I'm guessing you upgraded to 3.x but are using the 2.x
spamassassin/spamd.
> NoMailAudit doesn't exist in 3.x.
>

/var/log/mail tells me
spamd[960]: server started on port 783/tcp (running version 3.0.2)

:~# spamc  -V
SpamAssassin Client version 3.0.2

I did my upgrade via CPAN. What did go wrong?




Re: Re: Upgrade... + other (perl?) problems

2005-03-15 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 12:27:28AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Are there problems with mail header identification?
> Am I in the wrong list with this question?
> > Mar 13 01:16:18 ns spamd[28893]: processing message
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for web321p1:104.
> > Mar 13 01:16:20 ns spamd[28893]: Use of uninitialized value in
> > concatenation (.) or string at
> > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/NoMailAudit.pm line
> > 184.

I'm guessing you upgraded to 3.x but are using the 2.x spamassassin/spamd.
NoMailAudit doesn't exist in 3.x.

-- 
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"Three Things which a successful Systems Admin must have: "a quick wit,
 quick hands, and a quick connection.""  - A Modern Technical Triad


pgpQVWLPTlAH2.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Re: Upgrade... + other (perl?) problems

2005-03-15 Thread sa-users
Are there problems with mail header identification?
Am I in the wrong list with this question?

Thanks
Lars Dierich

> Mar 13 01:16:18 ns spamd[28893]: processing message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for web321p1:104.
> Mar 13 01:16:20 ns spamd[28893]: Use of uninitialized value in
> concatenation (.) or string at
> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/NoMailAudit.pm line
> 184.
This is line 184 of NoMailAudit.pm (one line)
  my(@ret) = $self->{headers_pristine} =~ /^(?:$hdr:[
]+(.*\n(?:\s+\S.*\n)*))/mig;


> Mar 13 01:16:20 ns spamd[28893]: Use of uninitialized value in pattern
> match (m//) at
> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm line
> 875.
this is line 875 of PerMsgStatus.pm
  my(@pristine_headers) = grep(!/^X-Spam-(?!Prev-)/i,
$self->{msg}->get_pristine_header() =~ /^([^:]+:[
\t]*(?:.*\n(?:\s+\S.*\n)*))/mig);




Re: Upgrade... + other (perl?) problems

2005-03-14 Thread sa-users
I upgraded from 2.64 to 3.0.2 via CPAN with no problems.

Yes, I read
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/UPGRADE
und did change my local.cf.

1) Now Mail don't get tagged as spam
==
/va/log/mail
Mar 14 12:34:33 ns spamd[27959]: connection from localhost.localdomain
[127.0.0.1] at port 43500
Mar 14 12:34:33 ns spamd[26710]: processing message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for web321p1:104.
Mar 14 12:34:35 ns spamd[26710]: identified spam (11.2/5.0) for
web321p1:104 in 2.0 seconds, 2403 bytes.

But procmail cant't filter anything because there are no X-SPAM-Headers
in the mail.

var/log/procmail:

>From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Mon Mar
14 12:34:33 2005
 Subject: Approved mortage rate
  Folder: /var/spool/mail/web321p1


2) wired logfile entries
Mar 13 01:16:18 ns spamd[28893]: processing message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for web321p1:104.
Mar 13 01:16:20 ns spamd[28893]: Use of uninitialized value in
concatenation (.) or string at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/NoMailAudit.pm line
184.
Mar 13 01:16:20 ns spamd[28893]: Use of uninitialized value in pattern
match (m//) at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm line
875.
Mar 13 01:16:20 ns spamd[28893]: clean message (4.6/5.0) for
web321p1:104 in 1.7 seconds, 4293 bytes.

This does not happen with every message.

Any suggestions?


Am 14.03.2005 um 05:12 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben:
> I upgraded to 3.02 and everything is working fine except for one
thing... I
> always put spam from all users into the /var/mail directory with the
> following lines in procmailrc
>
> :0:
> * ^X-Spam-Level: \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*
> /var/mail/spam
>
> After reading the new doc, I also added this line to the top of
procmailrc...
>
> DROPPRIVS=yes
>