Using Postfix always_bcc for catching messages
I am running Postfix 2.3.5 with SA 3.1.7 and amavisd-new. If I catch a copy of all messages using the Postfix option of always_bcc, will this work when learning those messages? I am wondering if the bcc address being in the header of all those messages will cause any learning issues regarding the address. -- Robert
Re: Using Postfix always_bcc for catching messages
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 16:39 +0300, Henrik Krohns wrote: On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 09:25:55AM -0400, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: I am running Postfix 2.3.5 with SA 3.1.7 and amavisd-new. If I catch a copy of all messages using the Postfix option of always_bcc, will this work when learning those messages? I am wondering if the bcc address being in the header of all those messages will cause any learning issues regarding the address. Use amavisd-new clean_quarantine method, it's more logical way imho. This way you end up with a single mail per file. And you can find messages for learning easily by quarantine ID. More info and scripts by request. :) Got your script, all works perfectly, thanks! My question is how do I know which archived id's to feed to your script to learn as spam, ham, etc? -- Robert
Re: Using Postfix always_bcc for catching messages
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 18:31 +0300, Henrik Krohns wrote: On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 11:22:05AM -0400, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: Got your script, all works perfectly, thanks! My question is how do I know which archived id's to feed to your script to learn as spam, ham, etc? Actually I'm not sure what your original question is now. If you meant autolearning or such, then the script is wrong ofcourse. My script is for relearning manually false positives or spams. In that case you should already know what to do. :) Yes, trying to come up with an semi-auto learn scheme. I am trying to use cyrus sieve filters to come up with as much ham and spam as possible, hence, trying to bcc a cyrus mailbox. Thanks for the script though, I am sure it is going to come in handy. I believe I'll archive as you suggest, let my sieve filters confirm ham and spam, delete the rest from my mailbox. So, do you think the bcc header will effect learning? That was my original question. -- Robert
