Re: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=? required=?
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 02:45:54PM +1000, ip guy wrote: > Anyone know why I'd keep seeing this in the mail herders of email scanner > for spam > > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=? required=? Whatever you have calling SA is adding markup. SA won't ever put in question marks. My guess is that it's timing out or something, but you'd have to figure that out. -- Randomly Selected Tagline: You will gain money by a speculation or lottery. pgp4mlq6ykfZt.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=? required=?
Maybe i wasn't clear. i guess it was the way i asked.
Anyone know why I'd keep seeing this in the mail herders of email scanner
for spam
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=? required=?
My setup currently uses spamc v2.40 on hostA to forward to spamd v3.1.8 on
hostB
My local.cf on hostB is setup with...
required_hits 8.0
rewrite_header Subject *SPAM*
It's only temporary setup until i can upgrade the primary MX on hostA
On 5/15/07, Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ip guy wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Anyone know why see "X-Spam-Status: No, hits=? required=?" in the
> email header after delivery and spam scanning ?
>
> My local.cf <http://local.cf> file looks like this
>
> required_score 8.0
> report_safe 1
> rewrite_header Subject *SPAM*
Do you use spamc? Was the message larger than the -s parameter to spamc
(default 500k)?
If yes to both, then spamc skipped scanning the message because it was
too large. There are some large spams out there, but there are
relatively few of them. On the other hand, there are lots of large
nonspam mails (attachments), and scanning large messages consumes a lot
of CPU and memory.
You can raise your -s to make spamc feed larger messages to spamd, but
be aware that this comes at a price of increased resource usage, so
choose a balance that fits your traffic load.
Re: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=? required=?
ip guy wrote: > Hi all > > Anyone know why see "X-Spam-Status: No, hits=? required=?" in the > email header after delivery and spam scanning ? > > My local.cf <http://local.cf> file looks like this > > required_score 8.0 > report_safe 1 > rewrite_header Subject *SPAM* Do you use spamc? Was the message larger than the -s parameter to spamc (default 500k)? If yes to both, then spamc skipped scanning the message because it was too large. There are some large spams out there, but there are relatively few of them. On the other hand, there are lots of large nonspam mails (attachments), and scanning large messages consumes a lot of CPU and memory. You can raise your -s to make spamc feed larger messages to spamd, but be aware that this comes at a price of increased resource usage, so choose a balance that fits your traffic load.
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=? required=?
Hi all Anyone know why see "X-Spam-Status: No, hits=? required=?" in the email header after delivery and spam scanning ? My local.cf file looks like this required_score 8.0 report_safe 1 rewrite_header Subject *SPAM* regards
