Re: How can I test my email to get spam score before sending?

2007-12-26 Thread mouss
Sg wrote:
> hi all,
>
> How can I test my email to get spam score before sending?
>
>   

If you mean "how to make sure that my email won't get tagged as spam by
others", then the short answer is "don't send spam and it should be ok".
There is no other answer (spammers and wanna spammers would love to see
one!). Everybody is filtering differently (you're not going to collect
the Bayes db of everybody out?).

if you want to see if your mail would trigger "static" rules, then run
it through "spamassassin -t".


Re: How can I test my email to get spam score before sending?

2007-12-25 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea

Sg wrote:

hi all,

How can I test my email to get spam score before sending?


This question is horribly void of any information that would make it 
possible to answer to, what I expect are, your expectations.


You really need to invest some time in your questions if you expect 
anyone to invest their time in answering them to your benefit.


Daryl




How can I test my email to get spam score before sending?

2007-12-25 Thread Sg
hi all,

How can I test my email to get spam score before sending?

-- 
Sg


Re: how can I test

2006-06-27 Thread Magnus Holmgren
On Monday 26 June 2006 20:50, Mauro Leite took the opportunity to write:
>  I've upgraded my SA and there is a doubt.
> How can I test this software, before put my computer to work on the net?

It depends on what you want to do, exactly. You can always pipe messages to 
spamassassin -t.

-- 
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   (No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)


pgpjnHO0o4UCj.pgp
Description: PGP signature


how can I test

2006-06-26 Thread Mauro Leite

I've upgraded my SA and there is a doubt.
How can I test this software, before put my computer to work on the net?
Sorry for my english, I'm a brazilian user.
Thanks


RE: How can I test SURBL is working

2005-11-21 Thread Dallas L. Engelken
> -Original Message-
> From: List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 9:57 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org; Matt Kettler
> Subject: Re: How can I test SURBL is working
> 
> > This message should fire them off
> >
> > http://surbl-org-permanent-test-point.com
> 
> I create a text with the following
> 
> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Received: from europe.std.com (europe.std.com [199.172.62.20])
> by mail.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 392E1114061
> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 21:34:46 + (Eire)
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 16:59:58 -0400
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: Keith Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: TBTF ping for 2001-04-20: Reviving
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Precedence: list
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> http://surbl-org-permanent-test-point.com
> 
> Saved it to testsurbl. Did a spamassassin -D -L < testsurbl  
> and the result
> :-
> 

This can be done much faster and easier with...

# echo -e "\n\nhttp://127.0.0.2"; | spamassassin
X-Spam-Tests: SBL,SURBL_AB,SURBL_JP,SURBL_MULTI,SURBL_OB,
SURBL_PH,SURBL_SC,SURBL_WS

Dallas


Re: How can I test SURBL is working

2005-11-20 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 12:33:34PM +0800, List wrote:
> Tried without -L . It yes and i works. Does that means i have to change 
> from /usr/bin/spamd -L -x -u vpopmail  to /usr/bin/spamd -x -u vpopmail ?

If you want network tests, such as SURBL, to be enabled, yes.

-- 
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"A Young Eel is called this."- Jeopardy Question
 "What is a baby eel Alex."- Theo's Response


pgp0waEoh9HFQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: How can I test SURBL is working

2005-11-20 Thread List
So you want to run without network checks (-L) to find out if a network 
test

will return a hit?


Tried without -L . It yes and i works. Does that means i have to change from 
/usr/bin/spamd -L -x -u vpopmail  to /usr/bin/spamd -x -u vpopmail ?




Content preview:  http://surbl-org-permanent-test-point.com [...]

Content analysis details:   (9.8 points, 5.0 required)

pts rule name  description
 -- --
3.4 URIBL_JP_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the JP SURBL blocklist
   [URIs: surbl-org-permanent-test-point.com]
3.3 URIBL_AB_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the AB SURBL blocklist
   [URIs: surbl-org-permanent-test-point.com]
2.2 URIBL_PH_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the PH SURBL blocklist
   [URIs: surbl-org-permanent-test-point.com]
3.0 URIBL_BLACKContains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist
   [URIs: surbl-org-permanent-test-point.com]
1.5 URIBL_WS_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the WS SURBL blocklist
   [URIs: surbl-org-permanent-test-point.com]
2.6 URIBL_OB_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the OB SURBL blocklist
   [URIs: surbl-org-permanent-test-point.com]
3.6 URIBL_SC_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the SC SURBL blocklist
   [URIs: surbl-org-permanent-test-point.com]
-9.8 AWLAWL: From: address is in the auto white-list





Re: How can I test SURBL is working

2005-11-20 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 11:56:49AM +0800, List wrote:
> Saved it to testsurbl. Did a spamassassin -D -L < testsurbl  and the result 
[...]
> Any insight?

So you want to run without network checks (-L) to find out if a network test
will return a hit?

-- 
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"Minix is one of the reasons I decided microkernels are bad.  VMS is the
 reason I decided VMS is bad." - Linus Torvalds


pgpbCoNwaZ3DZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: How can I test SURBL is working

2005-11-20 Thread List

This message should fire them off

http://surbl-org-permanent-test-point.com


I create a text with the following

Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from europe.std.com (europe.std.com [199.172.62.20])
   by mail.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 392E1114061
   for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 21:34:46 + (Eire)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 16:59:58 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Keith Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: TBTF ping for 2001-04-20: Reviving
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: list
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://surbl-org-permanent-test-point.com

Saved it to testsurbl. Did a spamassassin -D -L < testsurbl  and the result 
:-


[5542] dbg: check: 
subtests=__CT,__CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED,__CT_TEXT_PLAIN,__HAS_MSGID,__HAS_RCVD,__HAS_SUBJECT,__LOCAL_PP_NONPPURL,__MIME_VERSION,__NONEMPTY_BODY,__SANE_MSGID,__SARE_HEAD_MIME_VALID,__SARE_URI_ANY,__TOCC_EXISTS,__UNUSABLE_MSGID

Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-DCC:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on ns1.domain.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham
   version=3.1.0
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from europe.std.com (europe.std.com [199.172.62.20])
   by mail.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 392E1114061
   for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 21:34:46 + (Eire)

Any insight?

Thanks







Re: How can I test SURBL is working

2005-11-20 Thread Matt Kettler

This message should fire them off

http://surbl-org-permanent-test-point.com

At 10:20 PM 11/20/2005, List wrote:

Hi,

I have

1) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -q caching-nameserver
  caching-nameserver-7.3-3

2) Net::DNS is up to date.

3) /usr/bin/perl -T -w /usr/bin/spamd -L -x -u vpopmail

Running on FC4 with SpamAssassin 3.10, init.pre has

loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL

How do i test SA is running with SURBL. I dont see any hit on any email 
since the day(6 months now) i had installed SA.


Best regards




How can I test SURBL is working

2005-11-20 Thread List

Hi,

I have

1) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -q caching-nameserver
  caching-nameserver-7.3-3

2) Net::DNS is up to date.

3) /usr/bin/perl -T -w /usr/bin/spamd -L -x -u vpopmail

Running on FC4 with SpamAssassin 3.10, init.pre has

loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL

How do i test SA is running with SURBL. I dont see any hit on any email 
since the day(6 months now) i had installed SA.


Best regards