Re: ping
On 1/24/2015 11:09 AM, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote: Thanks. But no recent entries in the archive might mean an issue with the list. IIRC there was some discussion/warning about moving. https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/201501.mbox/browser shows 219 emails this month with some gap possible on the 14/15/16 so perhaps there was an issue that we didn't notice. However, the list is not moving or anything. Regards, KAM
Re: ping
On 1/17/2015 at 9:22 PM, cool hand luke coolhandl...@coolhandluke.org wrote: On 01/17/2015 03:59 PM, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote: Just checking. From http://www.list.org/mailman-member/node25.html: 7.6 I don't seem to be getting mail from the lists. What should I do? There are a few common reasons for this: No one has sent any mail to the list(s) you're on for a little while. To check if this is the case, try visiting the archives of the list (assuming that the list has archives). cf. https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/ /chl Thanks. But no recent entries in the archive might mean an issue with the list. IIRC there was some discussion/warning about moving.
ping
Just checking.
Re: ping
On 01/17/2015 03:59 PM, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote: Just checking. From http://www.list.org/mailman-member/node25.html: 7.6 I don't seem to be getting mail from the lists. What should I do? There are a few common reasons for this: No one has sent any mail to the list(s) you're on for a little while. To check if this is the case, try visiting the archives of the list (assuming that the list has archives). cf. https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/ /chl
PING ninjas - rule download broken
Since about 18.00 yesterday, there seems to be a problem with retrieving rules from http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/rulename.cf. When I retrieve any rule, I get the following HTML on the front, which causes SA lint to fail. I have tried several rulesets and several different hosts and still get the failure, only the IP address reported in the fopen changes. Sorry about posting here with it, but the only contact on the site is [EMAIL PROTECTED], which bounces. Nick Leverton br / bWarning/b: fopen(/var/vhosts/rulesemporium.com/html/ratelimit/217/217.155 .219.14.lck, w) - Permission denied in b/var/vhosts/rulesemporium.com/html/ ratelimit.php/b on line b212/bbr / br / bWarning/b: Cannot add header information - headers already sent by (output started at /var/vhosts/rulesemporium.com/html/ratelimit.php:212) in b/var/vho sts/rulesemporium.com/html/ratelimit.php/b on line b291/bbr / br / bWarning/b: Cannot add header information - headers already sent by (output started at /var/vhosts/rulesemporium.com/html/ratelimit.php:212) in b/var/vho sts/rulesemporium.com/html/ratelimit.php/b on line b292/bbr / # SARE HTML Ruleset for SpamAssassin - ruleset 0
Re: PING ninjas - rule download broken
Nick Leverton said: Since about 18.00 yesterday, there seems to be a problem with retrieving rules from http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/rulename.cf. When I retrieve any rule, I get the following HTML on the front, which causes SA lint to fail. I have tried several rulesets and several different hosts and still get the failure, only the IP address reported in the fopen changes. Sorry about posting here with it, but the only contact on the site is [EMAIL PROTECTED], which bounces. Nick Leverton This issue has been corrected, downloads should be working fine again. Thanks for the heads up! --matt
RE: PING ninjas - rule download broken
Since about 18.00 yesterday, there seems to be a problem with retrieving rules from http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/rulename.cf. When I retrieve any rule, I get the following HTML on the front, which causes SA lint to fail. I have tried several rulesets and several different hosts and still get the failure, only the IP address reported in the fopen changes. Sorry about posting here with it, but the only contact on the site is [EMAIL PROTECTED], which bounces. Nick Leverton This issue has been corrected, downloads should be working fine again. Thanks for the heads up! This is what happens when Ninjas get into the rice wine! Sooner or later either there is a server problem or somone gets a katana in the eye. :) --Chris
Re: Ping for primary MX
Perhaps something like: - a higher priority MX is up - the mail was delivered from a secondary MX with little or no delay Kenneth Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: My concern was primarily for the secondary, where you don't know the delay until you forward. Are you saying that the first rule runs on the secondaries, and the second rule runs on all but the lowest-priorty MX? No, it's a logical and rule. Both need to match for it to be spamsign. If the filter is actually run *on* the secondary, it still works since the delay will be just about zero. However, a lot of places just run the spam filter on the primary and have secondaries forward it to, or on an internal host to which all MXes deliver their mail. You can't assume every MX is running SpamAssassin independently. I've got a secondary which receives very little traffic for itself, and virtually all of the remaining traffic is spam destined for a primary elsewhere. It's running SA from MIMEDefang, configured to reject anything scoring 10 or more. Giving it a rule like the one proposed here would allow it to reject more instead of queuing it to the primary. The rule should work regardless of where it's run. It also should ideally work for forwarded email (assuming trusted_networks is set up, I don't expect it to check every relay hop, just the untrusted-trusted one. Daniel -- Daniel Quinlan http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/
