prefork: oops! no idle kids in need_to_del_server?
Following a SIGHUP of spamd, spamd decided to just stop: Oct 25 01:20:38 louiswu7 spamd[3122]: prefork: child states: IBBII Oct 25 01:20:38 louiswu7 spamd[3122]: spamd: handled cleanup of child pid 21529 due to SIGCHLD Oct 25 01:20:39 louiswu7 spamd[21548]: spamd reload - 1 updated files found [SIGHUP] Oct 25 01:20:39 louiswu7 spamd[3122]: spamd: child 18309 killed successfully Oct 25 01:20:39 louiswu7 spamd[3122]: spamd: child 21466 killed successfully Oct 25 01:20:39 louiswu7 spamd[3122]: spamd: child 21469 killed successfully Oct 25 01:20:40 louiswu7 spamd[3122]: spamd: child 20900 killed successfully Oct 25 01:20:39 louiswu7 spamd[3122]: prefork: child states: IBII Oct 25 01:20:40 louiswu7 spamd[3122]: prefork: child states: IBII Oct 25 01:20:40 louiswu7 spamd[3122]: prefork: oops! no idle kids in need_to_del_server? at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/SpamdForkScaling.pm line 846. This is SA 3.2.5. Any idea what happened here? /Per Jessen, Zürich
Re: prefork: oops! no idle kids in need_to_del_server?
Per Jessen wrote: > Following a SIGHUP of spamd, spamd decided to just stop: > > Oct 25 01:20:38 louiswu7 spamd[3122]: prefork: child states: IBBII > Oct 25 01:20:38 louiswu7 spamd[3122]: spamd: handled cleanup of child > pid 21529 due to SIGCHLD Oct 25 01:20:39 louiswu7 spamd[21548]: spamd > reload - 1 updated files found > [SIGHUP] > Oct 25 01:20:39 louiswu7 spamd[3122]: spamd: child 18309 killed > successfully Oct 25 01:20:39 louiswu7 spamd[3122]: spamd: child 21466 > killed successfully Oct 25 01:20:39 louiswu7 spamd[3122]: spamd: child > 21469 killed successfully Oct 25 01:20:40 louiswu7 spamd[3122]: spamd: > child 20900 killed successfully Oct 25 01:20:39 louiswu7 spamd[3122]: > prefork: child states: IBII Oct 25 01:20:40 louiswu7 spamd[3122]: > prefork: child states: IBII Oct 25 01:20:40 louiswu7 spamd[3122]: > prefork: oops! no idle kids in need_to_del_server? at > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/SpamdForkScaling.pm > line 846. > > This is SA 3.2.5. Any idea what happened here? I was about to open a bugreport on this until I did a search for spamd reports: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=spamd There are 195 reports, of which 90% or more seem to be new. Has the spamd maintainer gone away and died? /Per Jessen, Zürich
Re: prefork: oops! no idle kids in need_to_del_server?
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:07:15PM +0100, Per Jessen wrote: > I was about to open a bugreport on this until I did a search for spamd > reports: > > https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=spamd > > There are 195 reports, of which 90% or more seem to be new. Has the > spamd maintainer gone away and died? This is where someone, apparently me, gets to say: patches welcome and encouraged. :) The SA devs are generally a pretty busy lot, and typically $DAYJOB doesn't involve SA, so ... -- Randomly Selected Tagline: "Software engineering is a race between engineers who try to create foolproof software and the universe which is trying to create bigger fools. So far, the universe is winning..." - Michael H. Warfield pgpS5Kiedora0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: prefork: oops! no idle kids in need_to_del_server?
> I was about to open a bugreport on this until I did a search for spamd
> reports:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=spamd
That's a rather broad comment plain-text search and includes totally
unrelated stuff.
Instead, try limiting your search on Component spamc/spamd, then do it
again without feature requests (Severity enhancement). This draws a
slightly different and more accurate picture.
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
Re: prefork: oops! no idle kids in need_to_del_server?
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: >> I was about to open a bugreport on this until I did a search for >> spamd reports: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=spamd > > That's a rather broad comment plain-text search and includes totally > unrelated stuff. > > Instead, try limiting your search on Component spamc/spamd, then do it > again without feature requests (Severity enhancement). This draws a > slightly different and more accurate picture. Thanks, you're right, a very different picture - only one open report. I'll open another one. /Per Jessen, Zürich
Re: prefork: oops! no idle kids in need_to_del_server?
Per Jessen wrote: > Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > >>> I was about to open a bugreport on this until I did a search for >>> spamd reports: >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=spamd >> >> That's a rather broad comment plain-text search and includes totally >> unrelated stuff. >> >> Instead, try limiting your search on Component spamc/spamd, then do >> it again without feature requests (Severity enhancement). This draws >> a slightly different and more accurate picture. > > Thanks, you're right, a very different picture - only one open report. > I'll open another one. https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6006 /Per Jessen, Zürich
Re: prefork: oops! no idle kids in need_to_del_server?
Karsten =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Br=E4ckelmann?= writes: > > > I was about to open a bugreport on this until I did a search for spamd > > reports: > > > > https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=spamd > > That's a rather broad comment plain-text search and includes totally > unrelated stuff. > > Instead, try limiting your search on Component spamc/spamd, then do it > again without feature requests (Severity enhancement). This draws a > slightly different and more accurate picture. for what it's worth -- there's also currently no way to tell when a bug report has become stalled waiting for a reporter to provide additional info, or confirm if a fix or workaround has fixed the issue. In those cases, the bug just appears to be "open". --j.
Re: prefork: oops! no idle kids in need_to_del_server?
Per Jessen wrote: > Per Jessen wrote: > > https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6006 > OK, this is beginning to be annoying - I've seen it 4-5 times in the last week. I'll probably have to cobble up a quick spamd auto-restart. Is no-one else running spamd and using SIGHUP for reloading the config? /Per Jessen, Zürich
Re: prefork: oops! no idle kids in need_to_del_server?
At 10:18 02-11-2008, Per Jessen wrote: OK, this is beginning to be annoying - I've seen it 4-5 times in the last week. I'll probably have to cobble up a quick spamd auto-restart. Is no-one else running spamd and using SIGHUP for reloading the config? The configuration reloads correctly. See whether your issue is OS specific. Regards, -sm
Re: prefork: oops! no idle kids in need_to_del_server?
SM wrote: > At 10:18 02-11-2008, Per Jessen wrote: >>OK, this is beginning to be annoying - I've seen it 4-5 times in the >>last week. I'll probably have to cobble up a quick spamd >>auto-restart. Is no-one else running spamd and using SIGHUP for >>reloading the config? > > The configuration reloads correctly. See whether your issue is OS > specific. > Hi sm, I'm running on openSUSE 11.0. /Per Jessen, Zürich
