On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 17:28 -0400, Dennis German wrote:
> Thanks for the support.
Voluntary support. Please do keep the thread on-list, otherwise I'll
stop voluntaring. I'm not the only one who can help you.
> I do know enough not to past spam in a posting.
And yet you did paste the payload of a scam. Hint, the SOUGHT (FRAUD)
rule-set, which I feed myself, is designed to catch this sort of bare
text.
> I've been trying to get our local support(midphase) to
> handle some of the problems they have created by moving us to
> another server. Recall my question late last night ifm you got it.
>
> Anyway,
> I haven't been manually doing training.
>
> Should I be doing training?
>
> Also did you notice error "could not find site rules directory"
Yes, I did. Quite odd. Part of the reason I pointed out your setup, and
wondering out aloud which user is scanning and which one you dumped the
sa-learn stats for. Since you have not been training manually, these
should be the same.
As I have pointed out a couple times before, it is rather crucial to
manually train on *low* scoring spam, e.g. exactly like this one. They
are not auto-trained.
> My user_prefs is always available at
> http://www.real-world-systems.com/mail/user_prefs.cgi
>
>
> Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 21:21 -0400, Dennis German wrote:
> > > sa-learn --dump magic
> > > config: could not find site rules directory
> > > 0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
> > > 0.000 0 262297 0 non-token data: nspam
> > > 0.000 0 24621 0 non-token data: nham
> > > 0.000 0 142776 0 non-token data: ntokens
> >
> > Recalling some fuzzy bits about your system and setup, I wonder if that
> > is the Bayes DB of the *scanning* user -- or a different one you have
> > been manually training.
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
