spamass-milter goes to 100% CPU on freebsd 6.3

2008-02-29 Thread Aflatoon Aflatooni
Hi,
  I have installed spamassassin on my freebsd 6.3 and everything works great 
but after some time (it could be couple of days, or hours) the CPU utilization 
on spamass-milter goes to almost 100%.
  I have discovered that the following messages cause the 100% utilization:
   
  Feb 29 04:22:32 sara sm-mta[27844]: m1T9MQ2W027844: from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 
size=1721, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, proto=SMTP, 
daemon=IPv4, relay=[58.137.142.102]
Feb 29 04:22:32 sara sm-mta[27845]: m1T9MQgb027845: from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 
size=1737, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, proto=SMTP, 
daemon=IPv4, relay=[58.137.142.102]
Feb 29 04:22:32 sara spamd[27027]: spamd: connection from localhost [127.0.0.1] 
at port 61494
Feb 29 04:22:32 sara spamd[27027]: spamd: processing message <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]> for root:58
   
   
  Notice that sendmail receives two messages from the same relay by the same 
person with almost the same msgid, one is a057... and the other one is a056...
You see from the log that the second one is processed by spamd, but the first 
one causes the high cpu utilization in spam-milter. Since it is spam-milter and 
not sendmail that is having problem I am thinking that there is something in 
that message that is not liked by SpamAssassin.
How can I get more information logged about the message so I can find the 
root-cause? Has anyone else come across this problem?
   
  I have also posted this problem on bsdforums, because I wasn't sure if it is 
a problem with freebsd:
  http://www.bsdforums.org/forums/showthread.php?p=289253#post289253
   
  Many thanks
  Aflatoon

   
-
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.

Re: spamass-milter goes to 100% CPU on freebsd 6.3

2008-02-29 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
On 29/02/2008 12:51 PM, Aflatoon Aflatooni wrote:
> Hi,
> I have installed spamassassin on my freebsd 6.3 and everything works
> great but after some time (it could be couple of days, or hours) the CPU
> utilization on spamass-milter goes to almost 100%.
> I have discovered that the following messages cause the 100% utilization:

> Since it is
> spam-milter and not sendmail that is having problem I am thinking that
> there is something in that message that is not liked by SpamAssassin.

Since it's spamass-milter that is going to 100% and not spamd I would
look for a problem with spamass-milter.

That said, you've described the reliability I've come to expect from
spamass-milter.  I would (and do) personally use something else.

Daryl



Re: spamass-milter goes to 100% CPU on freebsd 6.3

2008-03-02 Thread Aflatoon Aflatooni
Here is anothe occurance of this problem:
   
  Mar  2 14:40:22 sara sm-mta[85764]: m22JeJxE085764: from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 
size=1678, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, proto=SMTP, 
daemon=IPv4, relay=host86-143-30-57.range86-143.btcentralplus.com [86.143.30.57]
Mar  2 14:40:22 sara sm-mta[85765]: m22JeJEu085765: from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 
size=1629, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, proto=SMTP, 
daemon=IPv4, relay=host86-143-30-57.range86-143.btcentralplus.com [86.143.30.57]
Mar  2 14:40:22 sara sm-mta[85766]: m22JeJ8l085766: from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 
size=1553, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, proto=SMTP, 
daemon=IPv4, relay=host86-143-30-57.range86-143.btcentralplus.com [86.143.30.57]
Mar  2 14:40:22 sara sm-mta[85767]: m22JeJh2085767: from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 
size=1574, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, proto=SMTP, 
daemon=IPv4, relay=host86-143-30-57.range86-143.btcentralplus.com [86.143.30.57]
Mar  2 14:40:22 sara spamd[64309]: spamd: connection from localhost [127.0.0.1] 
at port 53850
Mar  2 14:40:22 sara spamd[64309]: spamd: processing message <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]> for root:58
Mar  2 14:40:27 sara spamd[64309]: spamd: identified spam (22.1/5.0) for 
root:58 in 4.9 seconds, 1944 bytes.

  I am using spamassassin version 3.2.3 on FreeBSD 6.3.
  It looks like if similar messages are checked through spam-milter it causes a 
problem and the spam-milter goes to 99% cpu utilization.
  Is this a bug? has anyone else encountered this?
  
Thanks
   
  
Aflatoon Aflatooni  wrote:
Hi,
  I have installed spamassassin on my freebsd 6.3 and everything works great 
but after some time (it could be couple of days, or hours) the CPU utilization 
on spamass-milter goes to almost 100%.
  I have discovered that the following messages cause the 100% utilization:
   
  Feb 29 04:22:32 sara sm-mta[27844]: m1T9MQ2W027844: from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 
size=1721, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, proto=SMTP, 
daemon=IPv4, relay=[58.137.142.102]
Feb 29 04:22:32 sara sm-mta[27845]: m1T9MQgb027845: from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 
size=1737, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, proto=SMTP, 
daemon=IPv4, relay=[58.137.142.102]
Feb 29 04:22:32 sara spamd[27027]: spamd: connection from localhost [127.0.0.1] 
at port 61494
Feb 29 04:22:32 sara spamd[27027]: spamd: processing message <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]> for root:58
   
   
  Notice that sendmail receives two messages from the same relay by the same 
person with almost the same msgid, one is a057... and the other one is a056...
You see from the log that the second one is processed by spamd, but the first 
one causes the high cpu utilization in spam-milter. Since it is spam-milter and 
not sendmail that is having problem I am thinking that there is something in 
that message that is not liked by SpamAssassin.
How can I get more information logged about the message so I can find the 
root-cause? Has anyone else come across this problem?
   
  I have also posted this problem on bsdforums, because I wasn't sure if it is 
a problem with freebsd:
  http://www.bsdforums.org/forums/showthread.php?p=289253#post289253
   
  Many thanks
  Aflatoon

-
  Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.

   
-
Looking for last minute shopping deals?  Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.

Re: spamass-milter goes to 100% CPU on freebsd 6.3

2008-04-06 Thread Aflatoon Aflatooni
For sake of completeness I would like to send out the solution to this, in case 
anyone else is also having the same porblem.
  It seems like there is a problem with forking on FreeBSD 6.3:
  http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=119920
   
  The solution to fix this problem is to edit the file /etc/libmap.conf (create 
it if it doesn't exist) and add the following line to it:
   
  libpthread.so.2 libthr.so.2

  This will globally map libpthread to libthr.

You have to restart all the processes that link against libpthread.so.2 in 
order for the libmap.conf change to take effect.

  Thanks to Lawrence Stewart for the above solution.
   
  Aflatoon
  

Aflatoon Aflatooni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here is anothe occurance of this problem:
   
  Mar  2 14:40:22 sara sm-mta[85764]: m22JeJxE085764: from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 
size=1678, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, proto=SMTP, 
daemon=IPv4, relay=host86-143-30-57.range86-143.btcentralplus.com [86.143.30.57]
Mar  2 14:40:22 sara sm-mta[85765]: m22JeJEu085765: from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 
size=1629, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, proto=SMTP, 
daemon=IPv4, relay=host86-143-30-57.range86-143.btcentralplus.com [86.143.30.57]
Mar  2 14:40:22 sara sm-mta[85766]: m22JeJ8l085766: from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 
size=1553, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, proto=SMTP, 
daemon=IPv4, relay=host86-143-30-57.range86-143.btcentralplus.com [86.143.30.57]
Mar  2 14:40:22 sara sm-mta[85767]: m22JeJh2085767: from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 
size=1574, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, proto=SMTP, 
daemon=IPv4, relay=host86-143-30-57.range86-143.btcentralplus.com [86.143.30.57]
Mar  2 14:40:22 sara spamd[64309]: spamd: connection from localhost [127.0.0.1] 
at port 53850
Mar  2 14:40:22 sara spamd[64309]: spamd: processing message <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]> for root:58
Mar  2 14:40:27 sara spamd[64309]: spamd: identified spam (22.1/5.0) for 
root:58 in 4.9 seconds, 1944 bytes.

  I am using spamassassin version 3.2.3 on FreeBSD 6.3.
  It looks like if similar messages are checked through spam-milter it causes a 
problem and the spam-milter goes to 99% cpu utilization.
  Is this a bug? has anyone else encountered this?
  
Thanks
   
  
Aflatoon Aflatooni  wrote:
Hi,
  I have installed spamassassin on my freebsd 6.3 and everything works great 
but after some time (it could be couple of days, or hours) the CPU utilization 
on spamass-milter goes to almost 100%.
  I have discovered that the following messages cause the 100% utilization:
   
  Feb 29 04:22:32 sara sm-mta[27844]: m1T9MQ2W027844: from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 
size=1721, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, proto=SMTP, 
daemon=IPv4, relay=[58.137.142.102]
Feb 29 04:22:32 sara sm-mta[27845]: m1T9MQgb027845: from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 
size=1737, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, proto=SMTP, 
daemon=IPv4, relay=[58.137.142.102]
Feb 29 04:22:32 sara spamd[27027]: spamd: connection from localhost [127.0.0.1] 
at port 61494
Feb 29 04:22:32 sara spamd[27027]: spamd: processing message <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]> for root:58
   
   
  Notice that sendmail receives two messages from the same relay by the same 
person with almost the same msgid, one is a057... and the other one is a056...
You see from the log that the second one is processed by spamd, but the first 
one causes the high cpu utilization in spam-milter. Since it is spam-milter and 
not sendmail that is having problem I am thinking that there is something in 
that message that is not liked by SpamAssassin.
How can I get more information logged about the message so I can find the 
root-cause? Has anyone else come across this problem?
   
  I have also posted this problem on bsdforums, because I wasn't sure if it is 
a problem with freebsd:
  http://www.bsdforums.org/forums/showthread.php?p=289253#post289253
   
  Many thanks
  Aflatoon

-
  Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.


-
  Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.


   
-
You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total 
Access, No Cost.