Re: spamc -d option problem
OK - 3rd time same question. Is there a bug here or am I doing something wrong? The first host listed works but if the first host is down it doesn't try the next host in the list. Can't help you on that, sorry. Also - I can't seem to find a place to enter SA bugs into Bugzilla. But I can help you here: http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/ You will need to create an account to enter bugs, but that is no great invasion of privacy. Loren
Re: spamc -d option problem
Loren Wilton wrote: OK - 3rd time same question. Is there a bug here or am I doing something wrong? The first host listed works but if the first host is down it doesn't try the next host in the list. Can't help you on that, sorry. Also - I can't seem to find a place to enter SA bugs into Bugzilla. But I can help you here: http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/ You will need to create an account to enter bugs, but that is no great invasion of privacy. Thanks Loren. I have an account but the links from the main web site don't take me to SA's bugzilla. it takes me to an appache bugzilla page and SA is not on that list.
Re: spamc -d option problem
From: Marc Perkel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Loren Wilton wrote:
OK - 3rd time same question. Is there a bug here or am I doing something
wrong? The first host listed works but if the first host is down it
doesn't try the next host in the list.
Can't help you on that, sorry.
Also - I can't seem to find a place to enter SA bugs into Bugzilla.
But I can help you here:
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/
You will need to create an account to enter bugs, but that is no great
invasion of privacy.
Thanks Loren. I have an account but the links from the main web site
don't take me to SA's bugzilla. it takes me to an appache bugzilla page
and SA is not on that list.
The link that Loren provided does work. I hope it helps, eventually.
{^_^}
Re: spamc -d option problem
jdow wrote: From: Marc Perkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks Loren. I have an account but the links from the main web site don't take me to SA's bugzilla. it takes me to an appache bugzilla page and SA is not on that list. The redirector to the new URL wasn't working the other day for a bit. Daryl
Re: spamc -d option problem
Marc Perkel wrote: Marc Perkel wrote: I'm trying to use the spamc -d option and it doesn't seem to be working. I have multiple hosts listed and it works fo the first host bot not for the second. spamc -x -d pascal.ctyme.com,localhost What am I doing wrong? Or is there a bug? Am I the only one who is having this problem? Are there other people who have this working where the -d option works for more than one server in the list? OK - 3rd time same question. Is there a bug here or am I doing something wrong? The first host listed works but if the first host is down it doesn't try the next host in the list. Also - I can't seem to find a place to enter SA bugs into Bugzilla.
Re: spamc -d option problem
Marc Perkel wrote: I'm trying to use the spamc -d option and it doesn't seem to be working. I have multiple hosts listed and it works fo the first host bot not for the second. spamc -x -d pascal.ctyme.com,localhost What am I doing wrong? Or is there a bug? Am I the only one who is having this problem? Are there other people who have this working where the -d option works for more than one server in the list?
spamc -d option problem
I'm trying to use the spamc -d option and it doesn't seem to be working. I have multiple hosts listed and it works fo the first host bot not for the second. spamc -x -d pascal.ctyme.com,localhost What am I doing wrong? Or is there a bug?
Re: spamc -d option problem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Marc Perkel wrote: I'm trying to use the spamc -d option and it doesn't seem to be working. I have multiple hosts listed and it works fo the first host bot not for the second. spamc -x -d pascal.ctyme.com,localhost What am I doing wrong? Or is there a bug? Please clarify what you mean by it isn't working. With just the -d option, your spamc client will always try to connect to pascal.ctyme.com first and only if that server is non-responsive will it then try to connect to the spamd process running on the localhost. If you want it to randomly connect to either box, add the -H switch. David Goldsmith -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3rc2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEn85B417vU8/9QfkRAujTAJ9lT6IaHVB1clyyAXMBhtC8Q7purACfVFit MJatpA8//3nuRZH7fIblED0= =vt9B -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: spamc -d option problem
David Goldsmith wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Marc Perkel wrote: I'm trying to use the spamc -d option and it doesn't seem to be working. I have multiple hosts listed and it works fo the first host bot not for the second. spamc -x -d pascal.ctyme.com,localhost What am I doing wrong? Or is there a bug? Please clarify what you mean by "it isn't working". With just the -d option, your spamc client will always try to connect to pascal.ctyme.com first and only if that server is non-responsive will it then try to connect to the spamd process running on the localhost. If you want it to randomly connect to either box, add the -H switch. What I mean is it will connect to the first server, but if the first server is down it won't connect to the second server. And I have tried several tests and all the servers are working.
