Re: Equivalent of a check out by others?

[Thorsten Schöning]

Guten Tag Thuan Seah Tan,
am Freitag, 18. Mai 2012 um 06:53 schrieben Sie:

> Correct me if I am wrong,
> it seems since Subversion does not have the concept of checkout for edit,
> there is no way to retrieve information from the server as to who else could
> be editing the file at a given time? 

The equivalent of what you describe as checkout for edit is to aquire
a lock manually.

http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.7/svn.advanced.locking.html

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

Thorsten Schöning

-- 
Thorsten Schöning   E-Mail:thorsten.schoen...@am-soft.de
AM-SoFT IT-Systeme  http://www.AM-SoFT.de/

Telefon.030-2 1001-310
Fax...05151-  9468- 88
Mobil..0178-8 9468- 04

AM-SoFT GmbH IT-Systeme, Brandenburger Str. 7c, 31789 Hameln
AG Hanover HRB 207 694 - Geschäftsführer: Andreas Muchow

RE: Equivalent of a check out by others?

[Cooke, Mark]

> -Original Message-
> From: Thorsten Schöning [mailto:tschoen...@am-soft.de] 
> Sent: 18 May 2012 09:15
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Cc: Thuan Seah Tan
> Subject: Re: Equivalent of a check out by others?
> 
> Guten Tag Thuan Seah Tan,
> am Freitag, 18. Mai 2012 um 06:53 schrieben Sie:
> 
> > Correct me if I am wrong,
> > it seems since Subversion does not have the concept of 
> checkout for edit,
> > there is no way to retrieve information from the server as 
> to who else could
> > be editing the file at a given time? 
> 
> The equivalent of what you describe as checkout for edit is to aquire
> a lock manually.
> 
> http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.7/svn.advanced.locking.html

BUT note that this is not the way most people use subversion, which supports 
and encourages the "copy-modify-merge" model, instead of "lock-edit-unlock".

I recommend you read the introduction in the subversion online book to learn 
more:-

http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.7/svn.basic.version-control-basics.html

~ mark c


> Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
> 
> Thorsten Schöning
> 
> -- 
> Thorsten Schöning   E-Mail:thorsten.schoen...@am-soft.de
> AM-SoFT IT-Systeme  http://www.AM-SoFT.de/
> 
> Telefon.030-2 1001-310
> Fax...05151-  9468- 88
> Mobil..0178-8 9468- 04
> 
> AM-SoFT GmbH IT-Systeme, Brandenburger Str. 7c, 31789 Hameln
> AG Hanover HRB 207 694 - Geschäftsführer: Andreas Muchow
> 
> 

AW: Equivalent of a check out by others?

[Markus Schaber]

Hi,

Von: Thorsten Schöning [mailto:tschoen...@am-soft.de]
> Guten Tag Thuan Seah Tan,
> am Freitag, 18. Mai 2012 um 06:53 schrieben Sie:
> 
> > Correct me if I am wrong,
> > it seems since Subversion does not have the concept of checkout for
> > edit, there is no way to retrieve information from the server as to
> > who else could be editing the file at a given time?
> 
> The equivalent of what you describe as checkout for edit is to aquire a
> lock manually.
> 
> http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.7/svn.advanced.locking.html

Additinally, if one sets the "svn:needs-lock" property on a file, it is 
checked-out read-only until the user aquires a lock on that file.


Best regards

Markus Schaber
-- 
___
We software Automation.

3S-Smart Software Solutions GmbH
Markus Schaber | Developer
Memminger Str. 151 | 87439 Kempten | Germany | Tel. +49-831-54031-0 | Fax 
+49-831-54031-50

Email: m.scha...@3s-software.com | Web: http://www.3s-software.com 
CoDeSys internet forum: http://forum.3s-software.com
Download CoDeSys sample projects: 
http://www.3s-software.com/index.shtml?sample_projects

Managing Directors: Dipl.Inf. Dieter Hess, Dipl.Inf. Manfred Werner | Trade 
register: Kempten HRB 6186 | Tax ID No.: DE 167014915 

Subversion 1.7.5 compatibility question

[Edisandro Lima]

Hello,

 

I have downloaded the Windows version (.msi installer) maintained by David
Darj (  http://alagazam.net/) and I would like to know
whether or not this new 1.7.5 version is compatible with Apache 2.4 VC10
builds downloaded from ApacheLaunge.com

 

I've been using Subversion 1.7.4 without problems on Apache 2.2, but it did
not work on Apache 2.4. So this new version fixes this issue ?

 

Best Regards,

Edisandro.

 

 

Re: Subversion 1.7.5 compatibility question

[Philip Martin]

Edisandro Lima  writes:

> I have downloaded the Windows version (.msi installer) maintained by David
> Darj (  http://alagazam.net/) and I would like to know
> whether or not this new 1.7.5 version is compatible with Apache 2.4 VC10
> builds downloaded from ApacheLaunge.com
>
>  
>
> I've been using Subversion 1.7.4 without problems on Apache 2.2, but it did
> not work on Apache 2.4. So this new version fixes this issue ?

Subversion 1.7.5 is the first release that supports Apache 2.4 at a
source code level.  However Apache 2.2 and Apache 2.4 are not binary
compatible which means that Subversion must be compiled with Apache 2.4
to be used with Apache 2.4.  If Subversion is compiled with Apache 2.4
it will not work with Apache 2.2.

-- 
Philip

Re: Subversion 1.7.5 compatibility question

[Alagazam.net Subversion]

On 2012-05-18 15:23, Edisandro Lima wrote:


Hello,

I have downloaded the Windows version (.msi installer) maintained by 
David Darj (http://alagazam.net/) and I would like to know whether or 
not this new 1.7.5 version is compatible with Apache 2.4 VC10 builds 
downloaded from ApacheLaunge.com


I've been using Subversion 1.7.4 without problems on Apache 2.2, but 
it did not work on Apache 2.4. So this new version fixes this issue ?


Best Regards,

Edisandro.


Hi

My release is NOT compatible with Apache httpd 2.4.

I did a test doing my build against Apache httpd 2.4 including building 
httpd itself.
It's not very well tested (all svn tests passes though), and I don't 
know if it's compatible with
ApacheLaunge https as I use VC6 (yes it's ancient, I know ;-) but if you 
want I can give you a link to test it.


Regards
David Darj a.k.a. Alagazam

RE: Subversion 1.7.5 compatibility question

[Edisandro Lima]

Thanks Philip for your very prompt reply.

-Original Message-
From: MARTIN PHILIP [mailto:codematt...@ntlworld.com] On Behalf Of Philip
Martin
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 10:13 AM
To: Edisandro Lima
Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: Subversion 1.7.5 compatibility question

Edisandro Lima  writes:

> I have downloaded the Windows version (.msi installer) maintained by 
> David Darj (  http://alagazam.net/) and I would 
> like to know whether or not this new 1.7.5 version is compatible with 
> Apache 2.4 VC10 builds downloaded from ApacheLaunge.com
>
>  
>
> I've been using Subversion 1.7.4 without problems on Apache 2.2, but 
> it did not work on Apache 2.4. So this new version fixes this issue ?

Subversion 1.7.5 is the first release that supports Apache 2.4 at a source
code level.  However Apache 2.2 and Apache 2.4 are not binary compatible
which means that Subversion must be compiled with Apache 2.4 to be used with
Apache 2.4.  If Subversion is compiled with Apache 2.4 it will not work with
Apache 2.2.

--
Philip

Reasearch on comment

[Romain Smordowski]

Hello,
After reasearch on the Internet, I did not find any way to find a project
revision dipending on the comment.
It seems that this functionnality is not yet present in subversion (I did
not find an other place to ask for that).

What I would like is to be able to look in a whole project the commits with
a particular comment (may be with reguar expression). At work we often use
specific comment (such as support issue number) so looking to the
modifications that were done to answer a tocket would save a lot of time.

-- 

 *Romain SMORDOWSKI*
*Ingénieur d'étude*

r...@formaltis.fr
*Tél. : 03 20 76 11 76*

 
113 avenue Jean Lebas
59100 Roubaix 
(plan)

Re: Serf: Error retrieving REPORT (120105): APR does not understand this error code

[Daniel Shahaf]

I'd classify any instance of "APR does not understand this error code"
output in the UI as a bug.  And, definitely, if you're interesting in
improving libsvn_ra_serf you should head over to the dev@ list.

Thanks!

Daniel

Joel Low wrote on Fri, May 18, 2012 at 08:07:49 +0800:
> Perhaps this should go to dev@ instead? I'd really like to help improve
> Serf.
> 
> Regards,
> Joel
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Joel Low [mailto:j...@joelsplace.sg]
> > Sent: Tuesday, 15 May, 2012 6:30 PM
> > To: Stefan Sperling
> > Cc: Subversion Users' List (users@subversion.apache.org)
> > Subject: RE: Serf: Error retrieving REPORT (120105): APR does not
> understand
> > this error code
> > 
> > Hi Stefan,
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, 15 May, 2012 5:12 PM
> > > To: Joel Low
> > > Cc: Subversion Users' List (users@subversion.apache.org)
> > > Subject: Re: Serf: Error retrieving REPORT (120105): APR does not
> > understand
> > > this error code
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:10:35AM +0800, Joel Low wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I was doing a switch for my Apache HTTPd WC from the 2.2 tag to the
> > > > latest
> > > > 2.4 tag in preparation for building 1.7.5's mod_dav_svn. I am using
> > > > Serf as the RA layer: after a minute or two I get the message in the
> > > > title; I don't get the problem using Neon. I've already done a
> > > > Wireshark capture, so let me know who to email it to if it would help
> > > debugging.
> > > >
> > > > I think I need to disclaim that I am connected to s.a.o from
> > > > Singapore, where there is a transparent HTTP proxy implemented at the
> > > > national level for all HTTP requests being routed out of the country.
> > > > It could be that causing the misbehaviour with Serf.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance.
> > >
> > > There are and were many known problems with the serf-based repository
> > > access layer, which is why neon is still the default in Subversion 1.7.
> > > There is work happening on trunk at the moment to iron out these
> > problems.
> > >
> > > If you report problems with serf, you should mention the exact version
> > > numbers of serf and Subversion you used. Else, it is hard to tell
> whether
> > you
> > > ran into some problem that's already been fixed.
> > [Joel Low] I'm using TortoiseSVN nightly builds (on the 1.7 branch)
> > versions:
> > 
> > TortoiseSVN 1.7.99, Build 22899 - 64 Bit -dev, 2012/05/12 15:27:56
> > Subversion 1.7.6, -dev
> > apr 1.4.6
> > apr-utils 1.3.12
> > neon 0.29.6
> > serf 1.0.3
> > OpenSSL 1.0.1c 10 May 2012
> > zlib 1.2.7
> > 
> > >
> > > If you're in a position to try an svn client compiled from Subversion's
> > trunk,
> > > and linked against the most recent stable release of serf, that would be
> > help
> > > us identify problems that still need to be fixed before serf can be made
> > the
> > > default for Subversion 1.8.

Reintegrate merging with sparse checkouts

[Brian Neal]

Hello -

My question is basically the same as this one:

http://svn.haxx.se/users/archive-2010-04/0097.shtml

We are forced to use an unwieldy and inconvenient directory structure.
Spare checkouts are a big help to us. But it seems that (in the few
times I have tried) to reintegrate a feature branch to trunk it has
failed if either of the working copies are sparse. I believe I
understand why this is; when you merge from trunk to your branch, the
merge info cannot get applied to the directories you have omitted from
your branch working copy. And when you finally go to reintegrate your
branch back to trunk, the reintegrate fails because SVN sees you have
not applied all the changes to certain directories.

Perhaps I have done this wrong. If I have the same sparse directory
structures in my trunk & branch working copies (i.e. I made them
sparse in exactly the same way), should the reintegrate merge work?

Otherwise is there a way to tell SVN that the directories I omitted
from my working copies are irrelevant and do not need to be merged?

Thank you,
BN

RE: Reasearch on comment

[Bob Archer]

> Hello,
> After reasearch on the Internet, I did not find any way to find a project
> revision dipending on the comment.
> It seems that this functionnality is not yet present in subversion (I did not
> find an other place to ask for that).
> 
> 
> What I would like is to be able to look in a whole project the commits with a
> particular comment (may be with reguar expression). At work we often use
> specific comment (such as support issue number) so looking to the
> modifications that were done to answer a tocket would save a lot of time.

You can do it, but you have to bring the log down, perhaps in XML.

But, you might want to look into a serverside repo searching tool like FishEye.

BOb

Re: Reasearch on comment

[Ryan Schmidt]

On May 18, 2012, at 04:12, Romain Smordowski wrote:

> After reasearch on the Internet, I did not find any way to find a project 
> revision dipending on the comment.
> It seems that this functionnality is not yet present in subversion (I did not 
> find an other place to ask for that).

This is a good place to ask the question.

You're right, Subversion doesn't have a search feature. There are third-party 
products you can use for that. You could even build one. They work by indexing 
your commits as they happen, using a post-commit hook. FishEye is a commenrial 
product I've heard of that I think does what you want (though I've never used 
it), but I'm sure there are others, possibly even open source or at least free 
ones.

http://www.atlassian.com/software/fisheye/overview


> What I would like is to be able to look in a whole project the commits with a 
> particular comment (may be with reguar expression). At work we often use 
> specific comment (such as support issue number) so looking to the 
> modifications that were done to answer a tocket would save a lot of time.

This specific feature is usually implemented the other way around: in a 
post-commit hook, you parse the commit message for the ticket number. If found, 
you insert a comment into the ticket (hopefully your issue tracker has an API 
to do that) linking back to this revision (in a web-based Subversion revision 
viewer, which you'll probably also want a separate piece of software for, such 
as WebSVN, Trac, ViewVC, etc.).