Re: Removing code online

2013-10-02 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Sam Khan,
am Mittwoch, 2. Oktober 2013 um 03:25 schrieben Sie:

 There's online code that's being copied by others.
 https://subversion.assembla.com/svn/cs4410-als364/
 Is it possible you can remove the code for CS 4410 project MP1,MP2,MP3,MP4

No, this is public repo from assembla, if they don't want it public
they need to restrict access. If you think this is a mistake you
should contact assembla.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

Thorsten Schöning

-- 
Thorsten Schöning   E-Mail:thorsten.schoen...@am-soft.de
AM-SoFT IT-Systeme  http://www.AM-SoFT.de/

Telefon...05151-  9468- 55
Fax...05151-  9468- 88
Mobil..0178-8 9468- 04

AM-SoFT GmbH IT-Systeme, Brandenburger Str. 7c, 31789 Hameln
AG Hannover HRB 207 694 - Geschäftsführer: Andreas Muchow



Checkout to root folder causes sequence of exceptions:

2013-10-02 Thread Maurice Beelen
Hi,

I performed a Checkout on windows to the root of a drive and received a 
sequence of exceptions. Workaround was to make a folder for the working copy.

===
---
Subversion Exception!
---
Subversion encountered a serious problem.
Please take the time to report this on the Subversion mailing list
with as much information as possible about what
you were trying to do.
But please first search the mailing list archives for the error message
to avoid reporting the same problem repeatedly.
You can find the mailing list archives at
http://subversion.apache.org/mailing-lists.html

Subversion reported the following
(you can copy the content of this dialog
to the clipboard using Ctrl-C):

In file
'D:\Development\SVN\Releases\TortoiseSVN-1.8.2\ext\subversion\subversion\libsvn_wc\wc_db.c'
line 13212: assertion failed (svn_dirent_is_absolute(local_abspath))
---
OK
---



===
---
Subversion Exception!
---
Subversion encountered a serious problem.
Please take the time to report this on the Subversion mailing list
with as much information as possible about what
you were trying to do.
But please first search the mailing list archives for the error message
to avoid reporting the same problem repeatedly.
You can find the mailing list archives at
http://subversion.apache.org/mailing-lists.html

Subversion reported the following
(you can copy the content of this dialog
to the clipboard using Ctrl-C):

In file
'D:\Development\SVN\Releases\TortoiseSVN-1.8.2\ext\subversion\subversion\libsvn_subr\dirent_uri.c'
line 1571: assertion failed (! svn_path_is_url(relative))
---
OK
---


===
---
Subversion Exception!
---
Subversion encountered a serious problem.
Please take the time to report this on the Subversion mailing list
with as much information as possible about what
you were trying to do.
But please first search the mailing list archives for the error message
to avoid reporting the same problem repeatedly.
You can find the mailing list archives at
http://subversion.apache.org/mailing-lists.html

Subversion reported the following
(you can copy the content of this dialog
to the clipboard using Ctrl-C):

In file
'D:\Development\SVN\Releases\TortoiseSVN-1.8.2\ext\subversion\subversion\libsvn_subr\dirent_uri.c'
line 1571: assertion failed (! svn_path_is_url(relative))
---
OK
---

===
---
Subversion Exception!
---
Subversion encountered a serious problem.
Please take the time to report this on the Subversion mailing list
with as much information as possible about what
you were trying to do.
But please first search the mailing list archives for the error message
to avoid reporting the same problem repeatedly.
You can find the mailing list archives at
http://subversion.apache.org/mailing-lists.html

Subversion reported the following
(you can copy the content of this dialog
to the clipboard using Ctrl-C):

In file
'D:\Development\SVN\Releases\TortoiseSVN-1.8.2\ext\subversion\subversion\libsvn_subr\dirent_uri.c'
line 1571: assertion failed (! svn_path_is_url(relative))
---
OK
---


With kind regards, met vriendelijke groeten,

Maurice Beelen
Software Architect
___

Sioux. Source of your Technology
Technical Software | Electronics | Industrial Mathematics | Remote Solutions

Sioux Embedded Systems B.V.
Esp 405
5633 AJ Eindhoven
The Netherlands
www.sioux.euhttp://www.sioux.eu/
(navigation)http://maps.google.com/maps?q=sioux+eindhovenhl=enie=UTF8view=mapf=ddaddr=Esp+405,+5633+AJ+Eindhoven,+Netherlands+(Sioux+Embedded+Systems+B.V.)geocode=CR5KabnN4tr4FYWkEQMdz8FTACH9IEpbInwENgt=mz=16vpsrc=0

Sioux applies general terms and conditions (GTC). Our liability is limited to 
the extent mentioned in the GTC. Please see: www.sioux.euhttp://www.sioux.eu/.



RE: Subversion 1.8 httpd.exe taking 100% CPU

2013-10-02 Thread Dinesh Hirani
Hello Pavel,

Any update on this issue as the bug still exists?

From: Dinesh Hirani
Sent: 04 July 2013 16:30
To: 'Pavel Lyalyakin'; users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: RE: Subversion 1.8 httpd.exe taking 100% CPU


Hello Pavel,



Answer is in red below



-Original Message-
From: Pavel Lyalyakin [mailto:pavel.lyalya...@visualsvn.com]
Sent: 04 July 2013 16:19
To: users@subversion.apache.orgmailto:users@subversion.apache.org; Dinesh 
Hirani
Subject: Re: Subversion 1.8 httpd.exe taking 100% CPU



Hello Dinesh,



 We just upgraded subversion from 1.7 to 1.8 and noticed that the process 
 httpd.exe takes 100% and maxes the box and we have to keep killing the 
 httpd.exe, are you aware of this problem?



* What's your environment (svn client / server / Apache HTTP Server version)?

We using TortoiseSVN 1.8 / CollabNet Edge / Apache HTTP Server version 2.4.4

* What exactly do you do when the httpd.exe starts to consume 100% CPU time?

We don't know exactly what causes it because nothing is written to any logs as 
far we can see, however once we kill the httpd.exe then it's find for another 
couple of hours.



* Any related events on the server log?

Error log

Last message logged. Then at 9.35 I killed httpd.exe

[Thu Jul 04 09:24:49.798629 2013] [authz_svn:error] [pid 4844:tid 892] [client 
10.9.11.84:56153] Access denied: 'bparker' OPTIONS 
risk-dev:/Build/trunk/RabbitMQ



[Thu Jul 04 09:35:45.690450 2013] [mpm_winnt:notice] [pid 4204:tid 480] 
AH00428: Parent: child process 4844 exited with status 4294967295 -- Restarting.



Subversion log

Last message logged. Then at 9.35 I killed httpd.exe

[04/Jul/2013:09:33:52 +0100] svc-teamcity Risk-DEV log (/) r41581:41690 
discover-changed-paths revprops=all 0



[04/Jul/2013:09:35:02 +0100] svc-teamcity Risk-DEV log (/) r41581:41690 
discover-changed-paths revprops=all 0



--

With best regards,

Pavel Lyalyakin

VisualSVN Team


The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. 
It is intended solely for the addressee(s). Access by any other person to this 
e-mail is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
this e-mail. Any disclosure of this e-mail or of the parties to it and any 
copying or distribution of it is prohibited (and may be unlawful). The 
information expressed herein may be changed at any time without notice or 
obligation to update. We do not represent that this message is virus-free, 
complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as such. Electronic 
communications may be monitored for operational and business purposes to the 
extent permitted by applicable law. This email does not constitute legal or tax 
advice, and the information contained in this communication should not be 
regarded as such.


Decura IM LLP is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. 
Registered office address: 11-12 St James's Square, London SW1Y 4LB. Registered 
in England and Wales: OC375344

 

Decura LLP is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. 
Registered office address: 11-12 St James's Square, London SW1Y 4LB. Registered 
in England and Wales: OC377231


Re: Breaking up a monolothic repository

2013-10-02 Thread Ullrich Jans

Am 10.09.2013 19:45, schrieb Thomas Harold:


When we moved from a monolithic repository to per-client repositories a
few years ago, we went ahead and:

- Rebased the paths up one or two levels (old system was something like
monolithicrepo/[a-z]/[client directories]/[job directory]) so that the
urls were now clientrepo/[job directory].  That was a tricky thing to
do and we had to 'sed' the output of the dump filter before importing it
back.

It broke a few things, such as svn:externals which were not
relative-pathed, but was worth it in the long run so that our URLs got
shorter.

- Made sure that the new repos all had unique UUIDs.

- Renumbered all of the resulting revisions as we loaded things back in.
  But we didn't have to deal with any bug tracking systems that referred
to a specific revision.  And having lower revision numbers was
preferred, along with dropping revisions that referred to other projects.


I'm now facing the same problem. My users want the rebasing, but during 
the dump/load instead of after the fact (apparently, it causes issues 
with their environment when they need to go back to an earlier revision 
to reproduce something). They also want to keep the empty revisions (for 
references from the issue tracker).


I haven't tried it with svnadmin dump followed by svndumpfilter (I don't 
think it has that capability).


I've tried svnrdump (from svn 1.7), it resulted in either a new 
repository with the full path included (rdump/load all revs) or an 
interesting failure mode with a missing node during a copy operation 
when rdump -r revision_after_path:HEAD was used


I've also tried using svnsync, but that also results in the full path 
included, no rebasing.


How did you do it? Also, am I missing something that has been included 
in a current svn version?


Cheers,

Ulli

--
Ullrich Jans, Specialist, IT-A
Phone: +49 9131 7701-6627, mailto:ullrich.j...@elektrobit.com
Fax: +49 9131 7701-6333, www.elektrobit.com

Elektrobit Automotive GmbH, Am Wolfsmantel 46, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
Managing Directors: Alexander Kocher, Gregor Zink
Register Court Fürth HRB 4886



Please note: This e-mail may contain confidential information
intended solely for the addressee. If you have received this
e-mail in error, please do not disclose it to anyone, notify
the sender promptly, and delete the message from your system.
Thank you.



RE: Breaking up a monolothic repository

2013-10-02 Thread Bob Archer
 Am 10.09.2013 19:45, schrieb Thomas Harold:
 
  When we moved from a monolithic repository to per-client repositories
  a few years ago, we went ahead and:
 
  - Rebased the paths up one or two levels (old system was something
  like monolithicrepo/[a-z]/[client directories]/[job directory]) so
  that the urls were now clientrepo/[job directory].  That was a
  tricky thing to do and we had to 'sed' the output of the dump filter
  before importing it back.
 
  It broke a few things, such as svn:externals which were not
  relative-pathed, but was worth it in the long run so that our URLs got
  shorter.
 
  - Made sure that the new repos all had unique UUIDs.
 
  - Renumbered all of the resulting revisions as we loaded things back in.
But we didn't have to deal with any bug tracking systems that
  referred to a specific revision.  And having lower revision numbers
  was preferred, along with dropping revisions that referred to other 
  projects.
 
 I'm now facing the same problem. My users want the rebasing, but during the
 dump/load instead of after the fact (apparently, it causes issues with their
 environment when they need to go back to an earlier revision to reproduce
 something). They also want to keep the empty revisions (for references from
 the issue tracker).

Wouldn't it be much simpler to keep the current repository as a read only 
archives and move the HEAD of each project into its own repo?


 I haven't tried it with svnadmin dump followed by svndumpfilter (I don't 
 think it
 has that capability).
 
 I've tried svnrdump (from svn 1.7), it resulted in either a new repository 
 with
 the full path included (rdump/load all revs) or an interesting failure mode 
 with
 a missing node during a copy operation when rdump -r
 revision_after_path:HEAD was used
 
 I've also tried using svnsync, but that also results in the full path 
 included, no
 rebasing.
 
 How did you do it? Also, am I missing something that has been included in a
 current svn version?
 
 Cheers,
 
 Ulli