Re: 5.1.0.0 upgrade issues.

2009-02-24 Thread alex_yt_cheung

thanks for creating these JIRA, can you point me to the URI to create JIRA
for the PageTester request handling issue?  I just want to reverify the
behavior before creating it.

thanks
- alex


Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
 
 I've added TAP5-535 concerning PageTester and ApplicationDefaults.
 Please add an issue documenting the changes you've seen in PageTester
 request handling.
 
 On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Howard Lewis Ship hls...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 Oh yes; 5.1.0.0 is just an alpha release (that hasn't even been fully
 voted up yet).  I hope to address glaring bugs in it in a follow on
 release in a couple of weeks, and progress quickly to a final release.
 Thanks for checking it out so early!

 On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:13 AM, alex_yt_cheung
 alex_yt_che...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Any chance the PageTester's contributeApplicationDefaults() issues (...
 should use FactoryDefaults instead of ApplicationDefaults...) will be
 fixed
 in 5.1.0.0-GA?

 thanks
 - alex


 Howard Lewis Ship wrote:

 Thanks for the input; I definitely changed a few things in PageTester
 to simplify the behavior and make it use more of the same code
 pathways that a deployed application would. I'll see about fixing
 these.

 On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 6:39 PM, alex_yt_cheung
 alex_yt_che...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Yes baby, 5.1.0.0, fresh off the press and already running.. mostly:-)

 Just want to share my experience and ask how best to resolve some
 issues.

 * Some refactoring for new interface adaptations: LinkFactory, use of
 ValueEncoder instead of PrimaryKeyEncoder...etc.  nothing too serious
 to
 get
 the code compile and running.

 LinkFactory is internal and 5.1 has and will have more ways to
 accomplish the same goals that used to involve overriding LinkFactory.

 PKE: this change is quasi-backwards compatible; you may find that you
 can keep your PKE but have to use a different constructor of
 DefaultPrimaryKeyEncoder (to pass up the type of the key).

 * Tapestry module class is restricted to builders, contributions,
 decorators
 and bind methods.  If you have convenient methods inside the module
 classes,
 you will need to do some refactoring.

 You can use private methods for these convieniences.

 * The PageTester don't support parameters with space, comma, %, or +
 anymore.  Ended up reducing the complexity of the strings to allow the
 tests
 to run.  It will be great I can go back to having more complex strings
 as
 parameters to my test pages.

 Please add a detailed issue to JIRA for this.

 * Not sure if it is the PageTester or the rendering sequence, but I
 notice a
 difference in behavior on exception handling when using the
 PageTester.
 The
 call to renderPage() seems to have processed the exception, where
 previously
 the exception was thrown to the caller.  The announing part is that
 the
 document returned only tells you the exception, in my case, a
 ClassNotFoundException was thrown while loading the xxxPage, but I
 can't
 tell which class was really not found.
 * There is a PageTesterModule that contributes to the PageTester
 environment.  My issue is with contributeApplicationDefaults(), our
 module
 also issue an configuration.add(SymbolConstants.FORCE_ABSOLUTE_URIS,
 true).  It turned out that an IllegalArgumentException is thrown
 when
 tapestry sees two add() calls for the same key.  I use
 configuration.override() to fix my test, but that break my dev/prod
 environment because override() throws IllegalArgumentException when
 trying
 to override() an non-existent key.  The IllegalArgumentException
 exception
 is thrown from MappedConfiguration.apply():line 42.  That requires
 knowing
 if the key exists prior to calling override.  Maybe a new API to peek
 into
 the config for existence check will do nicely.

 Actualy, PageTester should override FactoryDefaults, rather than
 provide ApplicationDefaults. This can be fixed.


 I have some work-arounds, but will be grateful for patches or better
 solutions.

 thanks in advance.
 - alex
 --
 View this message in context:
 http://www.nabble.com/5.1.0.0-upgrade-issues.-tp22132202p22132202.html
 Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org





 --
 Howard M. Lewis Ship

 Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org




 --
 View this message in context:
 http://www.nabble.com/5.1.0.0-upgrade-issues.-tp22132202p22166911.html
 Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
 For additional commands

Re: 5.1.0.0 upgrade issues.

2009-02-23 Thread alex_yt_cheung

Any chance the PageTester's contributeApplicationDefaults() issues (...
should use FactoryDefaults instead of ApplicationDefaults...) will be fixed
in 5.1.0.0-GA?

thanks
- alex


Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
 
 Thanks for the input; I definitely changed a few things in PageTester
 to simplify the behavior and make it use more of the same code
 pathways that a deployed application would. I'll see about fixing
 these.
 
 On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 6:39 PM, alex_yt_cheung
 alex_yt_che...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Yes baby, 5.1.0.0, fresh off the press and already running.. mostly:-)

 Just want to share my experience and ask how best to resolve some issues.

 * Some refactoring for new interface adaptations: LinkFactory, use of
 ValueEncoder instead of PrimaryKeyEncoder...etc.  nothing too serious to
 get
 the code compile and running.
 
 LinkFactory is internal and 5.1 has and will have more ways to
 accomplish the same goals that used to involve overriding LinkFactory.
 
 PKE: this change is quasi-backwards compatible; you may find that you
 can keep your PKE but have to use a different constructor of
 DefaultPrimaryKeyEncoder (to pass up the type of the key).
 
 * Tapestry module class is restricted to builders, contributions,
 decorators
 and bind methods.  If you have convenient methods inside the module
 classes,
 you will need to do some refactoring.
 
 You can use private methods for these convieniences.
 
 * The PageTester don't support parameters with space, comma, %, or +
 anymore.  Ended up reducing the complexity of the strings to allow the
 tests
 to run.  It will be great I can go back to having more complex strings as
 parameters to my test pages.
 
 Please add a detailed issue to JIRA for this.
 
 * Not sure if it is the PageTester or the rendering sequence, but I
 notice a
 difference in behavior on exception handling when using the PageTester. 
 The
 call to renderPage() seems to have processed the exception, where
 previously
 the exception was thrown to the caller.  The announing part is that the
 document returned only tells you the exception, in my case, a
 ClassNotFoundException was thrown while loading the xxxPage, but I can't
 tell which class was really not found.
 * There is a PageTesterModule that contributes to the PageTester
 environment.  My issue is with contributeApplicationDefaults(), our
 module
 also issue an configuration.add(SymbolConstants.FORCE_ABSOLUTE_URIS,
 true).  It turned out that an IllegalArgumentException is thrown when
 tapestry sees two add() calls for the same key.  I use
 configuration.override() to fix my test, but that break my dev/prod
 environment because override() throws IllegalArgumentException when
 trying
 to override() an non-existent key.  The IllegalArgumentException
 exception
 is thrown from MappedConfiguration.apply():line 42.  That requires
 knowing
 if the key exists prior to calling override.  Maybe a new API to peek
 into
 the config for existence check will do nicely.
 
 Actualy, PageTester should override FactoryDefaults, rather than
 provide ApplicationDefaults. This can be fixed.
 

 I have some work-arounds, but will be grateful for patches or better
 solutions.

 thanks in advance.
 - alex
 --
 View this message in context:
 http://www.nabble.com/5.1.0.0-upgrade-issues.-tp22132202p22132202.html
 Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org


 
 
 
 -- 
 Howard M. Lewis Ship
 
 Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
 
 
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/5.1.0.0-upgrade-issues.-tp22132202p22166911.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org



5.1.0.0 upgrade issues.

2009-02-20 Thread alex_yt_cheung

Yes baby, 5.1.0.0, fresh off the press and already running.. mostly:-)

Just want to share my experience and ask how best to resolve some issues.

* Some refactoring for new interface adaptations: LinkFactory, use of
ValueEncoder instead of PrimaryKeyEncoder...etc.  nothing too serious to get
the code compile and running.
* Tapestry module class is restricted to builders, contributions, decorators
and bind methods.  If you have convenient methods inside the module classes,
you will need to do some refactoring.
* The PageTester don't support parameters with space, comma, %, or +
anymore.  Ended up reducing the complexity of the strings to allow the tests
to run.  It will be great I can go back to having more complex strings as
parameters to my test pages.
* Not sure if it is the PageTester or the rendering sequence, but I notice a
difference in behavior on exception handling when using the PageTester.  The
call to renderPage() seems to have processed the exception, where previously
the exception was thrown to the caller.  The announing part is that the
document returned only tells you the exception, in my case, a
ClassNotFoundException was thrown while loading the xxxPage, but I can't
tell which class was really not found.
* There is a PageTesterModule that contributes to the PageTester
environment.  My issue is with contributeApplicationDefaults(), our module
also issue an configuration.add(SymbolConstants.FORCE_ABSOLUTE_URIS,
true).  It turned out that an IllegalArgumentException is thrown when
tapestry sees two add() calls for the same key.  I use
configuration.override() to fix my test, but that break my dev/prod
environment because override() throws IllegalArgumentException when trying
to override() an non-existent key.  The IllegalArgumentException exception
is thrown from MappedConfiguration.apply():line 42.  That requires knowing
if the key exists prior to calling override.  Maybe a new API to peek into
the config for existence check will do nicely.

I have some work-arounds, but will be grateful for patches or better
solutions.

thanks in advance.
- alex
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/5.1.0.0-upgrade-issues.-tp22132202p22132202.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org