Re: [T5.3] Wot No Component Reference?
I don't think any of the mixins ever had examples. Here are the old pages: http://tapestry.apache.org/5.2/tapestry-core/ref/org/apache/tapestry5/corelib/mixins/Autocomplete.html http://tapestry.apache.org/5.2/tapestry-core/ref/org/apache/tapestry5/corelib/mixins/DiscardBody.html http://tapestry.apache.org/5.2/tapestry-core/ref/org/apache/tapestry5/corelib/mixins/NotEmpty.html http://tapestry.apache.org/5.2/tapestry-core/ref/org/apache/tapestry5/corelib/mixins/RenderClientId.html http://tapestry.apache.org/5.2/tapestry-core/ref/org/apache/tapestry5/corelib/mixins/RenderDisabled.html http://tapestry.apache.org/5.2/tapestry-core/ref/org/apache/tapestry5/corelib/mixins/RenderInformals.html http://tapestry.apache.org/5.2/tapestry-core/ref/org/apache/tapestry5/corelib/mixins/RenderNotification.html http://tapestry.apache.org/5.2/tapestry-core/ref/org/apache/tapestry5/corelib/mixins/TriggerFragment.html and likewise for the others you mentioned: http://tapestry.apache.org/5.2/tapestry-core/ref/org/apache/tapestry5/corelib/components/AddRowLink.html http://tapestry.apache.org/5.2/tapestry-core/ref/org/apache/tapestry5/corelib/components/RemoveRowLink.html http://tapestry.apache.org/5.2/tapestry-core/ref/org/apache/tapestry5/corelib/components/Unless.html Of course, most of them probably *should* have examples... On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Tony Nelson wrote: > Radio actually looks good. > > I didn't go thru them all, but none of the mixins have any example usage. > AddRowLink, RemoveRowLink, Unless.. > > > > > On Nov 3, 2011, at 10:39 AM, Emmanuel DEMEY wrote: > >> Hi Tony >> >> Which exemples do you talk about ? We still have the one define in the xdoc >> file : >> http://tapestry.apache.org/current/apidocs/org/apache/tapestry5/corelib/components/Radio.html >> >> 2011/11/3 Tony Nelson >> >>> Is there any way to get the example usages back? For folks still feeling >>> their way around, I found them invaluable. >>> >>> >>> On Nov 2, 2011, at 10:35 PM, Steve Eynon wrote: >>> I obviously like the Component Reference, for as Bob says, > it includes all tapestry components, mixins and pages It gives more of a complete overview (and blends in better with the rest of documentation). Steve. On 3 November 2011 08:58, Bob Harner wrote: > For now at least, I have the Documentation page pointing to > http://tapestry.apache.org/component-reference.html, because it > includes all tapestry components, mixins and pages, not just the core > components. > > Eventually the component search app I'm slowly working on > (https://github.com/bobharner/Tapestry-finder/wiki) could replace that > http://tapestry.apache.org/component-reference.html page I guess. > > On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo > wrote: >> On Wed, 02 Nov 2011 21:55:31 -0200, Bob Harner >>> wrote: >> >>> There are currently two candidates to directly replace the old >>> Component Reference: >>> >>> 1) The Javadoc version (nice and compact): >>> >>> >>> http://tapestry.apache.org/current/apidocs/org/apache/tapestry5/corelib/components/package-summary.html >>> >>> 2) Categorized and manually maintained: >>> http://tapestry.apache.org/component-reference.html >>> >>> What do you all think is the best one to link to? I suppose each >>> serves a purpose. >> >> I'd link both, or at least make the package summary link to the >>> caregorized >> one and vice-versa. >> >> -- >> Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo >> Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, >>> developer, and >> instructor >> Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda. >> http://www.arsmachina.com.br >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org >>> >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Emmanuel DEMEY >> Ingénieur Etude et Développement >> ATOS Worldline >> +33 (0)6 47 47 42 02 >> demey.emman...@gmail.com >> http://emmanueldemey.fr >> >> Twitter : @gillespie59 > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users
Re: [T5.3] Wot No Component Reference?
Radio actually looks good. I didn't go thru them all, but none of the mixins have any example usage. AddRowLink, RemoveRowLink, Unless.. On Nov 3, 2011, at 10:39 AM, Emmanuel DEMEY wrote: > Hi Tony > > Which exemples do you talk about ? We still have the one define in the xdoc > file : > http://tapestry.apache.org/current/apidocs/org/apache/tapestry5/corelib/components/Radio.html > > 2011/11/3 Tony Nelson > >> Is there any way to get the example usages back? For folks still feeling >> their way around, I found them invaluable. >> >> >> On Nov 2, 2011, at 10:35 PM, Steve Eynon wrote: >> >>> I obviously like the Component Reference, for as Bob says, >>> it includes all tapestry components, mixins and pages >>> >>> It gives more of a complete overview (and blends in better with the >>> rest of documentation). >>> >>> Steve. >>> >>> On 3 November 2011 08:58, Bob Harner wrote: For now at least, I have the Documentation page pointing to http://tapestry.apache.org/component-reference.html, because it includes all tapestry components, mixins and pages, not just the core components. Eventually the component search app I'm slowly working on (https://github.com/bobharner/Tapestry-finder/wiki) could replace that http://tapestry.apache.org/component-reference.html page I guess. On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote: > On Wed, 02 Nov 2011 21:55:31 -0200, Bob Harner >> wrote: > >> There are currently two candidates to directly replace the old >> Component Reference: >> >> 1) The Javadoc version (nice and compact): >> >> >> http://tapestry.apache.org/current/apidocs/org/apache/tapestry5/corelib/components/package-summary.html >> >> 2) Categorized and manually maintained: >> http://tapestry.apache.org/component-reference.html >> >> What do you all think is the best one to link to? I suppose each >> serves a purpose. > > I'd link both, or at least make the package summary link to the >> caregorized > one and vice-versa. > > -- > Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo > Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, >> developer, and > instructor > Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda. > http://www.arsmachina.com.br > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org >>> >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org >> >> > > > -- > Emmanuel DEMEY > Ingénieur Etude et Développement > ATOS Worldline > +33 (0)6 47 47 42 02 > demey.emman...@gmail.com > http://emmanueldemey.fr > > Twitter : @gillespie59 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [T5.3] Wot No Component Reference?
Hi Tony Which exemples do you talk about ? We still have the one define in the xdoc file : http://tapestry.apache.org/current/apidocs/org/apache/tapestry5/corelib/components/Radio.html 2011/11/3 Tony Nelson > Is there any way to get the example usages back? For folks still feeling > their way around, I found them invaluable. > > > On Nov 2, 2011, at 10:35 PM, Steve Eynon wrote: > > > I obviously like the Component Reference, for as Bob says, > > > >> it includes all tapestry components, mixins and pages > > > > It gives more of a complete overview (and blends in better with the > > rest of documentation). > > > > Steve. > > > > On 3 November 2011 08:58, Bob Harner wrote: > >> For now at least, I have the Documentation page pointing to > >> http://tapestry.apache.org/component-reference.html, because it > >> includes all tapestry components, mixins and pages, not just the core > >> components. > >> > >> Eventually the component search app I'm slowly working on > >> (https://github.com/bobharner/Tapestry-finder/wiki) could replace that > >> http://tapestry.apache.org/component-reference.html page I guess. > >> > >> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo > >> wrote: > >>> On Wed, 02 Nov 2011 21:55:31 -0200, Bob Harner > wrote: > >>> > There are currently two candidates to directly replace the old > Component Reference: > > 1) The Javadoc version (nice and compact): > > > http://tapestry.apache.org/current/apidocs/org/apache/tapestry5/corelib/components/package-summary.html > > 2) Categorized and manually maintained: > http://tapestry.apache.org/component-reference.html > > What do you all think is the best one to link to? I suppose each > serves a purpose. > >>> > >>> I'd link both, or at least make the package summary link to the > caregorized > >>> one and vice-versa. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo > >>> Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, > developer, and > >>> instructor > >>> Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda. > >>> http://www.arsmachina.com.br > >>> > >> > >> - > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > >> > >> > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > -- Emmanuel DEMEY Ingénieur Etude et Développement ATOS Worldline +33 (0)6 47 47 42 02 demey.emman...@gmail.com http://emmanueldemey.fr Twitter : @gillespie59
Re: [T5.3] Wot No Component Reference?
Is there any way to get the example usages back? For folks still feeling their way around, I found them invaluable. On Nov 2, 2011, at 10:35 PM, Steve Eynon wrote: > I obviously like the Component Reference, for as Bob says, > >> it includes all tapestry components, mixins and pages > > It gives more of a complete overview (and blends in better with the > rest of documentation). > > Steve. > > On 3 November 2011 08:58, Bob Harner wrote: >> For now at least, I have the Documentation page pointing to >> http://tapestry.apache.org/component-reference.html, because it >> includes all tapestry components, mixins and pages, not just the core >> components. >> >> Eventually the component search app I'm slowly working on >> (https://github.com/bobharner/Tapestry-finder/wiki) could replace that >> http://tapestry.apache.org/component-reference.html page I guess. >> >> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo >> wrote: >>> On Wed, 02 Nov 2011 21:55:31 -0200, Bob Harner wrote: >>> There are currently two candidates to directly replace the old Component Reference: 1) The Javadoc version (nice and compact): http://tapestry.apache.org/current/apidocs/org/apache/tapestry5/corelib/components/package-summary.html 2) Categorized and manually maintained: http://tapestry.apache.org/component-reference.html What do you all think is the best one to link to? I suppose each serves a purpose. >>> >>> I'd link both, or at least make the package summary link to the caregorized >>> one and vice-versa. >>> >>> -- >>> Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo >>> Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer, and >>> instructor >>> Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda. >>> http://www.arsmachina.com.br >>> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org >> >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [T5.3] Wot No Component Reference?
I obviously like the Component Reference, for as Bob says, > it includes all tapestry components, mixins and pages It gives more of a complete overview (and blends in better with the rest of documentation). Steve. On 3 November 2011 08:58, Bob Harner wrote: > For now at least, I have the Documentation page pointing to > http://tapestry.apache.org/component-reference.html, because it > includes all tapestry components, mixins and pages, not just the core > components. > > Eventually the component search app I'm slowly working on > (https://github.com/bobharner/Tapestry-finder/wiki) could replace that > http://tapestry.apache.org/component-reference.html page I guess. > > On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo > wrote: >> On Wed, 02 Nov 2011 21:55:31 -0200, Bob Harner wrote: >> >>> There are currently two candidates to directly replace the old >>> Component Reference: >>> >>> 1) The Javadoc version (nice and compact): >>> >>> http://tapestry.apache.org/current/apidocs/org/apache/tapestry5/corelib/components/package-summary.html >>> >>> 2) Categorized and manually maintained: >>> http://tapestry.apache.org/component-reference.html >>> >>> What do you all think is the best one to link to? I suppose each >>> serves a purpose. >> >> I'd link both, or at least make the package summary link to the caregorized >> one and vice-versa. >> >> -- >> Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo >> Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer, and >> instructor >> Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda. >> http://www.arsmachina.com.br >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [T5.3] Wot No Component Reference?
For now at least, I have the Documentation page pointing to http://tapestry.apache.org/component-reference.html, because it includes all tapestry components, mixins and pages, not just the core components. Eventually the component search app I'm slowly working on (https://github.com/bobharner/Tapestry-finder/wiki) could replace that http://tapestry.apache.org/component-reference.html page I guess. On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote: > On Wed, 02 Nov 2011 21:55:31 -0200, Bob Harner wrote: > >> There are currently two candidates to directly replace the old >> Component Reference: >> >> 1) The Javadoc version (nice and compact): >> >> http://tapestry.apache.org/current/apidocs/org/apache/tapestry5/corelib/components/package-summary.html >> >> 2) Categorized and manually maintained: >> http://tapestry.apache.org/component-reference.html >> >> What do you all think is the best one to link to? I suppose each >> serves a purpose. > > I'd link both, or at least make the package summary link to the caregorized > one and vice-versa. > > -- > Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo > Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer, and > instructor > Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda. > http://www.arsmachina.com.br > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [T5.3] Wot No Component Reference?
On Wed, 02 Nov 2011 21:55:31 -0200, Bob Harner wrote: There are currently two candidates to directly replace the old Component Reference: 1) The Javadoc version (nice and compact): http://tapestry.apache.org/current/apidocs/org/apache/tapestry5/corelib/components/package-summary.html 2) Categorized and manually maintained: http://tapestry.apache.org/component-reference.html What do you all think is the best one to link to? I suppose each serves a purpose. I'd link both, or at least make the package summary link to the caregorized one and vice-versa. -- Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer, and instructor Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda. http://www.arsmachina.com.br - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [T5.3] Wot No Component Reference?
There are currently two candidates to directly replace the old Component Reference: 1) The Javadoc version (nice and compact): http://tapestry.apache.org/current/apidocs/org/apache/tapestry5/corelib/components/package-summary.html 2) Categorized and manually maintained: http://tapestry.apache.org/component-reference.html What do you all think is the best one to link to? I suppose each serves a purpose. On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Steve Eynon wrote: > It's a single point of reference for what most people _want_ to know.* > > I've noticed its absence under the T5.3 heading for the longest time, > but hoped one day it would just "pop back"! > > Alas not yet... :( > > Steve. > > *(Some misguided souls have the conception that components are everything.) > > > > On 2 November 2011 23:02, Tony Nelson wrote: >> I was surprised when I noticed that today as well. I thought something was >> broken. I really preferred the old pages as well. My biggest problem is >> that all the examples are gone. >> >> But like most people, change is hard. If this is the new way, I'll get used >> to it. >> >> >> On Nov 2, 2011, at 10:48 AM, Steve Eynon wrote: >> >>> I'm more than happy for the Component documentation to move to the >>> JavaDocs but... >>> >>> Could we please have back the Component Reference page - that links to >>> the individual component JavaDoc pages? >>> >>> It's a very handy page to have - and is great for perusing and scanning >>> through. >>> >>> By sending everyone straight to the JavaDoc index page I'm also >>> concerned you might scare off a lot of new-comers, for with over 100 >>> java packages, it can look quite overwhelming. I know, I know, I'm >>> asking you to hide all your hard work! :) But honestly, I have best >>> interests at heart! >>> >>> Steve. >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org >>> >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org >> >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [T5.3] Wot No Component Reference?
It's a single point of reference for what most people _want_ to know.* I've noticed its absence under the T5.3 heading for the longest time, but hoped one day it would just "pop back"! Alas not yet... :( Steve. *(Some misguided souls have the conception that components are everything.) On 2 November 2011 23:02, Tony Nelson wrote: > I was surprised when I noticed that today as well. I thought something was > broken. I really preferred the old pages as well. My biggest problem is > that all the examples are gone. > > But like most people, change is hard. If this is the new way, I'll get used > to it. > > > On Nov 2, 2011, at 10:48 AM, Steve Eynon wrote: > >> I'm more than happy for the Component documentation to move to the >> JavaDocs but... >> >> Could we please have back the Component Reference page - that links to >> the individual component JavaDoc pages? >> >> It's a very handy page to have - and is great for perusing and scanning >> through. >> >> By sending everyone straight to the JavaDoc index page I'm also >> concerned you might scare off a lot of new-comers, for with over 100 >> java packages, it can look quite overwhelming. I know, I know, I'm >> asking you to hide all your hard work! :) But honestly, I have best >> interests at heart! >> >> Steve. >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org >> > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [T5.3] Wot No Component Reference?
I was surprised when I noticed that today as well. I thought something was broken. I really preferred the old pages as well. My biggest problem is that all the examples are gone. But like most people, change is hard. If this is the new way, I'll get used to it. On Nov 2, 2011, at 10:48 AM, Steve Eynon wrote: > I'm more than happy for the Component documentation to move to the > JavaDocs but... > > Could we please have back the Component Reference page - that links to > the individual component JavaDoc pages? > > It's a very handy page to have - and is great for perusing and scanning > through. > > By sending everyone straight to the JavaDoc index page I'm also > concerned you might scare off a lot of new-comers, for with over 100 > java packages, it can look quite overwhelming. I know, I know, I'm > asking you to hide all your hard work! :) But honestly, I have best > interests at heart! > > Steve. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
[T5.3] Wot No Component Reference?
I'm more than happy for the Component documentation to move to the JavaDocs but... Could we please have back the Component Reference page - that links to the individual component JavaDoc pages? It's a very handy page to have - and is great for perusing and scanning through. By sending everyone straight to the JavaDoc index page I'm also concerned you might scare off a lot of new-comers, for with over 100 java packages, it can look quite overwhelming. I know, I know, I'm asking you to hide all your hard work! :) But honestly, I have best interests at heart! Steve. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
