AW: Memory consumption in T4.1.2 - Hard data
T4.1.2 is released and in the main repo: http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.tapestry/tapestry-framework My POM: dependency groupIdorg.apache.tapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-framework/artifactId version4.1.2/version /dependency dependency groupIdorg.apache.tapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-annotations/artifactId version4.1.2/version /dependency dependency groupIdorg.apache.tapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-contrib/artifactId version4.1.2/version /dependency dependency groupIdcom.ewerk/groupId artifactIdewerk-tapestry-components/artifactId version0.0.7/version /dependency dependency groupIdcom.javaforge.tapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-spring/artifactId version1.0.0/version !-- exclude the old referenced version of tapestry -- exclusions exclusion groupIdtapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry/artifactId /exclusion exclusion groupIdtapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-annotations/artifactId /exclusion /exclusions /dependency Mit lieben Grüßen aus dem eWerk | Holger Stolzenberg | Softwareentwickler | | Geschäftsführer: | Frank Richter, Erik Wende, Hendrik Schubert | | eWerk IT GmbH | Markt 16 | Leipzig 04109 | http://www.ewerk.com | HRB 9065, AG Leipzig | Hauptniederlassung Leipzig | | fon +49.341.4 26 49-0 | fax +49.341.4 26 49-88 | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Support: | fon 0700 CALLME24 (0700 22556324) | fax 0700 CALLME24 (0700 22556324) | | Auskünfte und Angebote per Mail | sind freibleibend und unverbindlich. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Peter Stavrinides [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. August 2007 09:31 An: Tapestry users Betreff: Re: Memory consumption in T4.1.2 - Hard data Correct me if I am wrong 4.1.2 is not released as yet, and not in the main repository, so how else would I get to it? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But that POM does use snapshots. You shouldn't need the repository http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository at all. Probably, there are no very significant differences between the latest 4.1.2 snapshot and the release. But nevertheless, for a productive environment, I'd always go with a released version. -Original Message- From: Peter Stavrinides [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 7:45 AM To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: Memory consumption in T4.1.2 - Hard data This is my POM: repositories repository releases updatePolicyalways/updatePolicy checksumPolicywarn/checksumPolicy /releases snapshots updatePolicyalways/updatePolicy checksumPolicyfail/checksumPolicy repository idapache.snapshots/id urlhttp://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/url /repository /repositories dependency groupIdorg.apache.tapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-framework/artifactId version4.1.2-SNAPSHOT/version scopetest/scope /dependency dependency groupIdorg.apache.tapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-annotations/artifactId version4.1.2-SNAPSHOT/version scopetest/scope /dependency dependency groupIdorg.apache.tapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-contrib/artifactId version4.1.2-SNAPSHOT/version scopetest/scope /dependency dependency groupIdorg.apache.tapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-portlet/artifactId version4.1.2-SNAPSHOT/version scopetest/scope /dependency [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: my configuration is as follows: JDK 6.01 32bit JVM (I have also tested on a 64 bit with no luck) Tomcat 5.5.20 Debian Linux (2.6.15.28 kernel) Tapestry 4.1.2-SNAPSHOT with ognl 2.7 Hi Peter, 4.1.2-SNAPSHOT is a typo, I suppose? regards, Peter Jesse Kuhnert wrote: I'd downgrade then if I were you. Extensive profiling with yourkit hasn't shed any new light on whatever problems others are having. The OGNL classes indeed aren't being kept in the javassist pool from what I can tell. I have another yourkit snapshot binary to look at so we'll see what that says. I don't remember - have you filed any bug reports or reported any problems? Are you getting ognl exceptions during development as well as production? Do these errors sound like umpotential errors that should be looked at further? On 8/28/07, Peter Stavrinides [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Jessie Any progress on this? sorry to bug you, but I have to take a decision soon, I have two production machines that will need to upgrade or downgrade
Re: AW: Memory consumption in T4.1.2 - Hard data
Okay, I will try and build with this version... lets see if it makes a difference. Holger Stolzenberg wrote: T4.1.2 is released and in the main repo: http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.tapestry/tapestry-framework My POM: dependency groupIdorg.apache.tapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-framework/artifactId version4.1.2/version /dependency dependency groupIdorg.apache.tapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-annotations/artifactId version4.1.2/version /dependency dependency groupIdorg.apache.tapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-contrib/artifactId version4.1.2/version /dependency dependency groupIdcom.ewerk/groupId artifactIdewerk-tapestry-components/artifactId version0.0.7/version /dependency dependency groupIdcom.javaforge.tapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-spring/artifactId version1.0.0/version !-- exclude the old referenced version of tapestry -- exclusions exclusion groupIdtapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry/artifactId /exclusion exclusion groupIdtapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-annotations/artifactId /exclusion /exclusions /dependency Mit lieben Grüßen aus dem eWerk | Holger Stolzenberg | Softwareentwickler | | Geschäftsführer: | Frank Richter, Erik Wende, Hendrik Schubert | | eWerk IT GmbH | Markt 16 | Leipzig 04109 | http://www.ewerk.com | HRB 9065, AG Leipzig | Hauptniederlassung Leipzig | | fon +49.341.4 26 49-0 | fax +49.341.4 26 49-88 | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Support: | fon 0700 CALLME24 (0700 22556324) | fax 0700 CALLME24 (0700 22556324) | | Auskünfte und Angebote per Mail | sind freibleibend und unverbindlich. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Peter Stavrinides [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. August 2007 09:31 An: Tapestry users Betreff: Re: Memory consumption in T4.1.2 - Hard data Correct me if I am wrong 4.1.2 is not released as yet, and not in the main repository, so how else would I get to it? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But that POM does use snapshots. You shouldn't need the repository http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository at all. Probably, there are no very significant differences between the latest 4.1.2 snapshot and the release. But nevertheless, for a productive environment, I'd always go with a released version. -Original Message- From: Peter Stavrinides [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 7:45 AM To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: Memory consumption in T4.1.2 - Hard data This is my POM: repositories repository releases updatePolicyalways/updatePolicy checksumPolicywarn/checksumPolicy /releases snapshots updatePolicyalways/updatePolicy checksumPolicyfail/checksumPolicy repository idapache.snapshots/id urlhttp://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/url /repository /repositories dependency groupIdorg.apache.tapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-framework/artifactId version4.1.2-SNAPSHOT/version scopetest/scope /dependency dependency groupIdorg.apache.tapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-annotations/artifactId version4.1.2-SNAPSHOT/version scopetest/scope /dependency dependency groupIdorg.apache.tapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-contrib/artifactId version4.1.2-SNAPSHOT/version scopetest/scope /dependency dependency groupIdorg.apache.tapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-portlet/artifactId version4.1.2-SNAPSHOT/version scopetest/scope /dependency [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: my configuration is as follows: JDK 6.01 32bit JVM (I have also tested on a 64 bit with no luck) Tomcat 5.5.20 Debian Linux (2.6.15.28 kernel) Tapestry 4.1.2-SNAPSHOT with ognl 2.7 Hi Peter, 4.1.2-SNAPSHOT is a typo, I suppose? regards, Peter Jesse Kuhnert wrote: I'd downgrade then if I were you. Extensive profiling with yourkit hasn't shed any new light on whatever problems others are having. The OGNL classes indeed aren't being kept in the javassist pool from what I can tell. I have another yourkit snapshot binary to look at so we'll see what that says. I don't remember - have you filed any bug reports or reported any problems? Are you getting ognl exceptions during development as well as production? Do these errors sound like umpotential errors that should be looked at further? On 8/28/07, Peter Stavrinides [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Re: AW: Memory consumption in T4.1.2 - Hard data
The problem continues... I will file a bug report. Peter Stavrinides wrote: Okay, I will try and build with this version... lets see if it makes a difference. Holger Stolzenberg wrote: T4.1.2 is released and in the main repo: http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.tapestry/tapestry-framework My POM: dependency groupIdorg.apache.tapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-framework/artifactId version4.1.2/version /dependency dependency groupIdorg.apache.tapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-annotations/artifactId version4.1.2/version /dependency dependency groupIdorg.apache.tapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-contrib/artifactId version4.1.2/version /dependency dependency groupIdcom.ewerk/groupId artifactIdewerk-tapestry-components/artifactId version0.0.7/version /dependency dependency groupIdcom.javaforge.tapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-spring/artifactId version1.0.0/version !-- exclude the old referenced version of tapestry -- exclusions exclusion groupIdtapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry/artifactId /exclusion exclusion groupIdtapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-annotations/artifactId /exclusion /exclusions /dependency Mit lieben Grüßen aus dem eWerk | Holger Stolzenberg | Softwareentwickler | | Geschäftsführer: | Frank Richter, Erik Wende, Hendrik Schubert | | eWerk IT GmbH | Markt 16 | Leipzig 04109 | http://www.ewerk.com | HRB 9065, AG Leipzig | Hauptniederlassung Leipzig | | fon +49.341.4 26 49-0 | fax +49.341.4 26 49-88 | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Support: | fon 0700 CALLME24 (0700 22556324) | fax 0700 CALLME24 (0700 22556324) | | Auskünfte und Angebote per Mail | sind freibleibend und unverbindlich. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Peter Stavrinides [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. August 2007 09:31 An: Tapestry users Betreff: Re: Memory consumption in T4.1.2 - Hard data Correct me if I am wrong 4.1.2 is not released as yet, and not in the main repository, so how else would I get to it? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But that POM does use snapshots. You shouldn't need the repository http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository at all. Probably, there are no very significant differences between the latest 4.1.2 snapshot and the release. But nevertheless, for a productive environment, I'd always go with a released version. -Original Message- From: Peter Stavrinides [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 7:45 AM To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: Memory consumption in T4.1.2 - Hard data This is my POM: repositories repository releases updatePolicyalways/updatePolicy checksumPolicywarn/checksumPolicy /releases snapshots updatePolicyalways/updatePolicy checksumPolicyfail/checksumPolicy repository idapache.snapshots/id urlhttp://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/url /repository /repositories dependency groupIdorg.apache.tapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-framework/artifactId version4.1.2-SNAPSHOT/version scopetest/scope /dependency dependency groupIdorg.apache.tapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-annotations/artifactId version4.1.2-SNAPSHOT/version scopetest/scope /dependency dependency groupIdorg.apache.tapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-contrib/artifactId version4.1.2-SNAPSHOT/version scopetest/scope /dependency dependency groupIdorg.apache.tapestry/groupId artifactIdtapestry-portlet/artifactId version4.1.2-SNAPSHOT/version scopetest/scope /dependency [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: my configuration is as follows: JDK 6.01 32bit JVM (I have also tested on a 64 bit with no luck) Tomcat 5.5.20 Debian Linux (2.6.15.28 kernel) Tapestry 4.1.2-SNAPSHOT with ognl 2.7 Hi Peter, 4.1.2-SNAPSHOT is a typo, I suppose? regards, Peter Jesse Kuhnert wrote: I'd downgrade then if I were you. Extensive profiling with yourkit hasn't shed any new light on whatever problems others are having. The OGNL classes indeed aren't being kept in the javassist pool from what I can tell. I have another yourkit snapshot binary to look at so we'll see what that says. I don't remember - have you filed any bug reports or reported any problems? Are you getting ognl exceptions during development as well as production? Do these errors sound like umpotential errors that should be looked at further? On 8/28/07, Peter Stavrinides [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Jessie Any progress on this? sorry to bug you, but I have to take a
