Hi all,
I'm new to Tapestry, doing mostly a lot of initial research atm. Really
impressed with the framework so far, and I'd like to start diving deeper.
I think it would be a good discussion to see what kind of dev. setups
everybody uses out in the wild, and motivation behind why they chose one
over the other(s).
I propose this simple format:
Currently using: [IDE], [Tool1], [Tool2], [...]
+ stable
+ code completion
- commercial
etc.
Tried: [IDE-1], [Tool1-1], [Tool2-1], [...-1]
+ fast
- no documentation
etc.
Tried: [IDE-2], [Tool1-2], [Tool2-2], [...-2]
Etc.
Here's mine:
Currently using: Eclipse, WTP, Subclipse, Tomcat 5.5 (same as at
http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry/HowToSetupEclipseWtp)
+ pretty good for development and debugging: *basic* xml/html/java
tools
+ see changes right away (T4 caching off + project auto-build)
+ nice integration with servlet container (Tomcat, any other, etc.)
+ open source
- really miss smart code completion & intentions for Java in
IntelliJ Idea
- no code completion for Tapestry-specific files, like in Spindle
- when T4 is configured as a User Library, can't use it to run; have
to put jars into WEB-INF/lib
- WTP publishing is not instantaneous, as it has to move modified
files to a temp dir first
Tried: IntelliJ Idea, Tomcat 5.5
+ great for Java coding
- mediocre for XML and tapestry-specific files
- commercial license
Tried: Eclipse, Spindle 3, Tomcat (Tapestry 3)
+ Tap. code completion
- very unstable
Regards,
- A
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
