RE: Re: conditional and nested ul and li tags

2006-06-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks Ryan. I tried using more correct html but I still got the same parsing 
error:
 
Closing tag /li on line 28 is improperly nested with tag span on line 27.
 
So I don't know of a way to put the closing tags in an If component.
And if I try to put the tags in the bindings, I get a different parse error:
 
component id=insertUlTag type=Insertbinding name=value 
value='ul'/binding name=raw value=true/   
/component 
 
 
Unable to read context:/WEB-INF/MyDiscussion.page: The value of attribute 
value associated with an element type binding must not contain the '' 
character.
 
So, I guess using a custom library of open and close tags may just be the best 
way to go.
 



 Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 11:55:45 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 
 users@tapestry.apache.org Subject: Re: conditional and nested ul and li 
 tags  First, you can't nest UL tags outside of LI tags. I'm sure most 
 browsers  will render it correctly, but a more strict parser (like the 
 Tapestry  page parser) will choke on it. Your HTML structure needs to be:  
 ul liPost 1/li liPost 2ul   liPost 2, 
 Reply A/li   liPost 2, Reply B ul
  liPost 2, Reply B, Reply i/li liPost 2, 
 Reply B, Reply ii/li /ul   /li   
 liPost 2, Reply C/li/ul /liliPost 3/li /ul 
  Second, in page and component specifications, binding values are assumed  
 to be OGNL calls unless you specify a prefix (unlike templates, where  
 values are assumed to be literal strings unless there is a prefix). So  
 there are two ways to fix your Insert component:  component 
 id=insertUlTag type=Insert binding name=value value='ul'/ 
 binding name=raw value=true/ /component  -- or --  component 
 id=insertUlTag type=Insert binding name=value 
 value=literal:ul/ binding name=raw value=true/ /component  
 Note that the raw parameter is required to prevent Tapestry from  escaping 
 the HTML.  Last, you're probably looking for a recursive DisplayReplies 
 component  to walk the tree of replies and created nested UL's and LI's as 
 needed.  That's a little difficult to do in Tapestry because you can't 
 create  simple recursive components. In other words, you can't easily render 
  (conditionally or otherwise) a component inside of itself without a  
 getting a stack overflow exception. You have to use a trick involving  Block 
 and RenderBlock to get recursive behavior. If you're interested, I  can post 
 a tiny Tapestry app that demonstrates how to do this. It uses  articles 
 and comments rather than posts and replies, but it is a  stripped down 
 demo with one page and one component demonstrating what I  think you are 
 trying to do and nothing more (and it uses UL and LI tags).  -Ryan  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  I am trying to set up a page that has comments 
 listed in a big list surrounded by ul tags. Under certains conditions, I want 
 to nest more ul tags. Like this:ullithis is post 1/lilithis 
 is post 2/liullithis is reply to post 2/li
 lithis is another reply to post 2/lilithis it yet an additional 
 reply/liulliAnd this is a reply to the one 
 above/li/ulliThe last reply to post 2/li/ul
 lithis is post 3/li/ulHowever, I run into problem in Tapestry when I 
 try to do something like this:span jwcid=ifSomething
 /ul/spanTapestry complains that I am improperly nesting a /ul tag 
 inside a span. One way I thought of getting arround this was to use an Insert 
 so that the html would be:span jwcid=ifSomethingspan 
 jwcid=insertUlTag//spanWhich sort of worked until I go to the page 
 descriptor and I couldn't figure out how to put ul in the 
 binding:component id=insertUlTag type=Insertbinding 
 name=value value=ul/   /componentThe parser complained and 
 using CDATA didn't help. So I ended up making a getUlOpenTag method on the 
 java file for the page which return ul so then I had this:component 
 id=insertUlOpenTag type=Insertbinding name=value 
 value=ulOpenTag/  binding name=raw value=true/ 
 /componentand that worked.But is there not an easier way? I actually ended 
 up creating a new library that just had open and close HTML tags just for 
 instances like this.Thanks  
 _  Express 
 yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!  
 http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/   
 - To 
 unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
_
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/

Re: Re: conditional and nested ul and li tags

2006-06-12 Thread Peter Dawn

check if you are missing a span ending tag somewhere else. i sometimes
get this error and its usually some other tag which is complaining,
not the one its highlighting.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]