Re: Does Tapestry5 support Portlets specs JSR168 and 286
My vote is to portlet in T5. Sincerely, Arve Klev 2007/12/29, Jan Vissers [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Add me to the portlet petition; Me too! Add me to the portlet petition; we're about to start development on a portal with Liferay and it would be great to have portlet support in T5. Regards, D On 12/28/07, Emmanuel Sowah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Howard, Well, left me alone, I would say instead of the effort to support Portlets in T5, spend that in making T5 backward compatible to T4 and T3. You would save many people a lot of misery in migrating. E. On Dec 28, 2007 11:24 PM, Howard Lewis Ship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's really the other way around; a Portlet is defined in terms of a T5 application, where the application pages are mapped to different views of the portlet. A portal would contain many portlets, some T5 applications, some natively implemented. On Dec 28, 2007 11:19 AM, Michael Lake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: would it be completely ridiculous for a T5 component to house a portlet? is that at all feasible? -mike On Dec 28, 2007, at 2:06 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: Currently there are not plans to support Portlets in T5 for the initial release. If there is enough interest, it will be added as a follow on. It will be much easier to add to T5 than it was to T4, since a lot of the ideas in T5 came from T4 and its portlet support. such as the action request / render request split present in T5 (and in portlets). On Dec 28, 2007 10:09 AM, Cardenas, Juan Carlos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't seem to find a reference in the documentation. I know Tapestry4 at least covers 168 What are the plans for covering JSR 286 Portlet 2.0 spec? Carlos -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- What the world needs is more geniuses with humility, there are so few of us left. Oscar Levant - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Does Tapestry5 support Portlets specs JSR168 and 286
Well, you can always make a portlet-container component. :) Christian. On 30-Dec-07, at 15:12 , Arve Klev wrote: My vote is to portlet in T5. Sincerely, Arve Klev 2007/12/29, Jan Vissers [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Add me to the portlet petition; Me too! Add me to the portlet petition; we're about to start development on a portal with Liferay and it would be great to have portlet support in T5. Regards, D On 12/28/07, Emmanuel Sowah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Howard, Well, left me alone, I would say instead of the effort to support Portlets in T5, spend that in making T5 backward compatible to T4 and T3. You would save many people a lot of misery in migrating. E. On Dec 28, 2007 11:24 PM, Howard Lewis Ship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's really the other way around; a Portlet is defined in terms of a T5 application, where the application pages are mapped to different views of the portlet. A portal would contain many portlets, some T5 applications, some natively implemented. On Dec 28, 2007 11:19 AM, Michael Lake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: would it be completely ridiculous for a T5 component to house a portlet? is that at all feasible? -mike On Dec 28, 2007, at 2:06 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: Currently there are not plans to support Portlets in T5 for the initial release. If there is enough interest, it will be added as a follow on. It will be much easier to add to T5 than it was to T4, since a lot of the ideas in T5 came from T4 and its portlet support. such as the action request / render request split present in T5 (and in portlets). On Dec 28, 2007 10:09 AM, Cardenas, Juan Carlos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't seem to find a reference in the documentation. I know Tapestry4 at least covers 168 What are the plans for covering JSR 286 Portlet 2.0 spec? Carlos -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- What the world needs is more geniuses with humility, there are so few of us left. Oscar Levant - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Does Tapestry5 support Portlets specs JSR168 and 286
Seconded - my company will not use Tapestry because of the constant changes between versions. Its even starting to drive me away in favor of WebObjects... On Dec 28, 2007, at 5:59 PM, Emmanuel Sowah wrote: Howard, Well, left me alone, I would say instead of the effort to support Portlets in T5, spend that in making T5 backward compatible to T4 and T3. You would save many people a lot of misery in migrating. E. On Dec 28, 2007 11:24 PM, Howard Lewis Ship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's really the other way around; a Portlet is defined in terms of a T5 application, where the application pages are mapped to different views of the portlet. A portal would contain many portlets, some T5 applications, some natively implemented. On Dec 28, 2007 11:19 AM, Michael Lake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: would it be completely ridiculous for a T5 component to house a portlet? is that at all feasible? -mike On Dec 28, 2007, at 2:06 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: Currently there are not plans to support Portlets in T5 for the initial release. If there is enough interest, it will be added as a follow on. It will be much easier to add to T5 than it was to T4, since a lot of the ideas in T5 came from T4 and its portlet support. such as the action request / render request split present in T5 (and in portlets). On Dec 28, 2007 10:09 AM, Cardenas, Juan Carlos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't seem to find a reference in the documentation. I know Tapestry4 at least covers 168 What are the plans for covering JSR 286 Portlet 2.0 spec? Carlos -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Does Tapestry5 support Portlets specs JSR168 and 286
Add me to the portlet petition; Me too! Add me to the portlet petition; we're about to start development on a portal with Liferay and it would be great to have portlet support in T5. Regards, D On 12/28/07, Emmanuel Sowah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Howard, Well, left me alone, I would say instead of the effort to support Portlets in T5, spend that in making T5 backward compatible to T4 and T3. You would save many people a lot of misery in migrating. E. On Dec 28, 2007 11:24 PM, Howard Lewis Ship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's really the other way around; a Portlet is defined in terms of a T5 application, where the application pages are mapped to different views of the portlet. A portal would contain many portlets, some T5 applications, some natively implemented. On Dec 28, 2007 11:19 AM, Michael Lake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: would it be completely ridiculous for a T5 component to house a portlet? is that at all feasible? -mike On Dec 28, 2007, at 2:06 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: Currently there are not plans to support Portlets in T5 for the initial release. If there is enough interest, it will be added as a follow on. It will be much easier to add to T5 than it was to T4, since a lot of the ideas in T5 came from T4 and its portlet support. such as the action request / render request split present in T5 (and in portlets). On Dec 28, 2007 10:09 AM, Cardenas, Juan Carlos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't seem to find a reference in the documentation. I know Tapestry4 at least covers 168 What are the plans for covering JSR 286 Portlet 2.0 spec? Carlos -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- What the world needs is more geniuses with humility, there are so few of us left. Oscar Levant - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Does Tapestry5 support Portlets specs JSR168 and 286
Currently there are not plans to support Portlets in T5 for the initial release. If there is enough interest, it will be added as a follow on. It will be much easier to add to T5 than it was to T4, since a lot of the ideas in T5 came from T4 and its portlet support. such as the action request / render request split present in T5 (and in portlets). On Dec 28, 2007 10:09 AM, Cardenas, Juan Carlos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't seem to find a reference in the documentation. I know Tapestry4 at least covers 168 What are the plans for covering JSR 286 Portlet 2.0 spec? Carlos -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Does Tapestry5 support Portlets specs JSR168 and 286
would it be completely ridiculous for a T5 component to house a portlet? is that at all feasible? -mike On Dec 28, 2007, at 2:06 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: Currently there are not plans to support Portlets in T5 for the initial release. If there is enough interest, it will be added as a follow on. It will be much easier to add to T5 than it was to T4, since a lot of the ideas in T5 came from T4 and its portlet support. such as the action request / render request split present in T5 (and in portlets). On Dec 28, 2007 10:09 AM, Cardenas, Juan Carlos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't seem to find a reference in the documentation. I know Tapestry4 at least covers 168 What are the plans for covering JSR 286 Portlet 2.0 spec? Carlos -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Does Tapestry5 support Portlets specs JSR168 and 286
It's really the other way around; a Portlet is defined in terms of a T5 application, where the application pages are mapped to different views of the portlet. A portal would contain many portlets, some T5 applications, some natively implemented. On Dec 28, 2007 11:19 AM, Michael Lake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: would it be completely ridiculous for a T5 component to house a portlet? is that at all feasible? -mike On Dec 28, 2007, at 2:06 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: Currently there are not plans to support Portlets in T5 for the initial release. If there is enough interest, it will be added as a follow on. It will be much easier to add to T5 than it was to T4, since a lot of the ideas in T5 came from T4 and its portlet support. such as the action request / render request split present in T5 (and in portlets). On Dec 28, 2007 10:09 AM, Cardenas, Juan Carlos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't seem to find a reference in the documentation. I know Tapestry4 at least covers 168 What are the plans for covering JSR 286 Portlet 2.0 spec? Carlos -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Does Tapestry5 support Portlets specs JSR168 and 286
Hi, Consider this as interest in having T5 support portlets. We are just about starting porting a largish JSP-hell application to a proper CMS system plus Tapestry and portlets, and I would very much like to see that we can jump right onto T5. To us, portlets are more important that AJAX (since we don't have much of that in the current app anyway). Regards, Olle Hallin 2007/12/28, Howard Lewis Ship [EMAIL PROTECTED]: It's really the other way around; a Portlet is defined in terms of a T5 application, where the application pages are mapped to different views of the portlet. A portal would contain many portlets, some T5 applications, some natively implemented. On Dec 28, 2007 11:19 AM, Michael Lake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: would it be completely ridiculous for a T5 component to house a portlet? is that at all feasible? -mike On Dec 28, 2007, at 2:06 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: Currently there are not plans to support Portlets in T5 for the initial release. If there is enough interest, it will be added as a follow on. It will be much easier to add to T5 than it was to T4, since a lot of the ideas in T5 came from T4 and its portlet support. such as the action request / render request split present in T5 (and in portlets). On Dec 28, 2007 10:09 AM, Cardenas, Juan Carlos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't seem to find a reference in the documentation. I know Tapestry4 at least covers 168 What are the plans for covering JSR 286 Portlet 2.0 spec? Carlos -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Olle Hallin M.Sc. +46 70 6653071 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.hit.se
Re: Does Tapestry5 support Portlets specs JSR168 and 286
Howard, Well, left me alone, I would say instead of the effort to support Portlets in T5, spend that in making T5 backward compatible to T4 and T3. You would save many people a lot of misery in migrating. E. On Dec 28, 2007 11:24 PM, Howard Lewis Ship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's really the other way around; a Portlet is defined in terms of a T5 application, where the application pages are mapped to different views of the portlet. A portal would contain many portlets, some T5 applications, some natively implemented. On Dec 28, 2007 11:19 AM, Michael Lake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: would it be completely ridiculous for a T5 component to house a portlet? is that at all feasible? -mike On Dec 28, 2007, at 2:06 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: Currently there are not plans to support Portlets in T5 for the initial release. If there is enough interest, it will be added as a follow on. It will be much easier to add to T5 than it was to T4, since a lot of the ideas in T5 came from T4 and its portlet support. such as the action request / render request split present in T5 (and in portlets). On Dec 28, 2007 10:09 AM, Cardenas, Juan Carlos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't seem to find a reference in the documentation. I know Tapestry4 at least covers 168 What are the plans for covering JSR 286 Portlet 2.0 spec? Carlos -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Does Tapestry5 support Portlets specs JSR168 and 286
Add me to the portlet petition; we're about to start development on a portal with Liferay and it would be great to have portlet support in T5. Regards, D On 12/28/07, Emmanuel Sowah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Howard, Well, left me alone, I would say instead of the effort to support Portlets in T5, spend that in making T5 backward compatible to T4 and T3. You would save many people a lot of misery in migrating. E. On Dec 28, 2007 11:24 PM, Howard Lewis Ship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's really the other way around; a Portlet is defined in terms of a T5 application, where the application pages are mapped to different views of the portlet. A portal would contain many portlets, some T5 applications, some natively implemented. On Dec 28, 2007 11:19 AM, Michael Lake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: would it be completely ridiculous for a T5 component to house a portlet? is that at all feasible? -mike On Dec 28, 2007, at 2:06 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: Currently there are not plans to support Portlets in T5 for the initial release. If there is enough interest, it will be added as a follow on. It will be much easier to add to T5 than it was to T4, since a lot of the ideas in T5 came from T4 and its portlet support. such as the action request / render request split present in T5 (and in portlets). On Dec 28, 2007 10:09 AM, Cardenas, Juan Carlos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't seem to find a reference in the documentation. I know Tapestry4 at least covers 168 What are the plans for covering JSR 286 Portlet 2.0 spec? Carlos -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- What the world needs is more geniuses with humility, there are so few of us left. Oscar Levant
